Search

Background: Chance fracture (CFx) with concomitant intra-abdominal injury has variable occurrence rates ranging from 33 to 89%. No single study has compared the incidence of simultaneous abdominal injury between pediatric and adult populations. This study compares the rate of simultaneous intra-abdominal injury and chance fracture in these populations., Methods: A retrospective review of pediatric and adult patients with chance fracture in comparable pediatric and adult trauma centers was performed. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury (MOI), and injury patterns were collected from 2002 to 2019 for pediatric patients and 2015 to 2018 for adults. Student t-test analyses were performed to determine statistical significance between the cohorts., Results: The pediatric group had a similar incidence of abdominal solid organ injuries compared to adults (16 [20.5%] vs. 40 [19.7%], p<0.879), but the pediatric group had a greater number of total intra-abdominal (49 [62.8%] vs. 47 [23.1%], p < 0.001) and hollow organ injuries (40 [51.3%] vs. 17 [8.4%], p < 0.001). Motor vehicle collision was the most common mechanism of injury for both groups (72 pediatric [92.3%] vs. 85 adult [41.7%]) but adults suffered from more falls (3 pediatric vs. 81 adult, p < 0.001). Pediatric patients with CFx caused by MVCs had more intra-abdominal injuries (48 [66.7%] vs. 25[29.8%], p < 0.001) and hollow organ injuries compared to adults (39 [54.2%] vs. 8[9.5%], p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In the setting of Chance fracture after trauma, pediatric patients are more likely to have a concomitant intra-abdominal organ injury (63% vs. 23%), especially hollow viscus injury (51.3% vs. 8.4%) compared with adults regardless of mechanism.

Objective: Validated assessment of procedural knowledge and skills with formative remediation is a foundational part of achieving surgical competency. High-fidelity simulation programs provide a unique area to assess resident proficiency and independence, as well as to assist in identifying residents in need of further practice. While several studies have validated the use of simulation to attain proficiency of specific technical skills, few have validated remediation pathways for their trainees objectively. In this descriptive analysis, we review 2 remediation pathways within our simulation training curricula and how these are used in assessments of resident proficiency., Materials and Methods: Two methods of remediation were formulated for use in high-fidelity simulation labs. One remediation pathway was a summative process, where ultimate judgment of resident competency was assessed through intra-operative assessments of a holistic skill set. The second remediation pathway was a formative "coaching" process, where feedback is given at several intervals along the pathway towards a specific technical skills competence. All general surgery residents are enrolled in the longitudinal, simulation curricula., Results: Approximately one-third of surgical residents entered into a remediation pathway for either of the high-fidelity simulation curricula. Both residents and faculty expressed support for the summative and formative remediation pathways as constructed. Residents who entered remediation pathways believed it was a beneficial exercise, and the most common feedback was that remediation principles should be expanded to all residents. Interestingly, faculty demonstrated stronger support for the formative coaching feedback model than the summative assessment model., Conclusions: Through the complementary use of both formative and summative remediation pathways, resident competence can be enriched in a constructive, nonpunitive method for self-directed performance improvement. Both trainees and faculty express high satisfaction with programs explicitly organized to ensure that skills are rated through a standardized process.

Background: Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects about 475,000 children in the United States annually. Studies from the 1990s showed worse mortality in pediatric TBI patients not transferred to a pediatric trauma center (PTC), but did not examine mild pediatric TBI. Evidence-based guidelines used to identify children with clinically insignificant TBI who do not require head CT were developed by the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). However, which patients can be safely observed at a non-PTC is not directly addressed., Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, focusing on management of pediatric TBI and transfer decisions from 1990 to 2020., Results: Pediatric TBI patients make up a great majority of preventable transfers and admissions, and comprise a significant portion of avoidable costs to the health care system. Majority of mild TBI patients admitted to a PTC following transfer do not require ICU care, surgical intervention, or additional imaging. Studies have shown that as high as 83% of mild pediatric TBI patients are discharged within 24 hrs., Conclusions: An evidence-based clinical practice algorithm was derived through synthesis of the data reviewed to guide transfer decision. The papers discussed in our systematic review largely concluded that transfer and admission was unnecessary and costly in pediatric patients with mild TBI who met the following criteria: blunt, no concern for NAT, low risk on PECARN assessment, or intermediate risk on PECARN with negative imaging or imaging with either isolated, nondisplaced skull fractures without ICH and/or EDH, or SDH <0.3 cm with no midline shift.