Search

The article focuses on blunt tension pneumomediastinum (TPMN), a rare condition in which air enters the mediastinum and causes hemodynamic compromise. Topics discussed include the etiology of TPMN, diagnostic challenges, and the management of this condition, emphasizing the importance of obtaining a CT scan when possible and considering placement of chest tubes directed toward the anterior mediastinum.

Draining the chest cavity with two chest tubes after thoracotomy for trauma is controversial. This article aims to determine whether using two tubes after thoracotomy for trauma is more effective than using a single tube. A 9-year retrospective review (2007-2015) was performed at our academic level I trauma center. All patients who underwent trauma thoracotomy (unilateral and bilateral) were included for analysis (n = 99). Patients with incomplete data, pediatric patients (age < 18), pregnant patients, and early deaths (<24 hours) were excluded. When analyzed by chest cavity, dual tubes have increased drainage bilaterally (P = 0.008) and require more days to clear the right chest (P = 0.002). Patients with dual tubes bilaterally are associated with increased intensive care unit length of stay (P = 0.05) and ventilator days (P = 0.04). Although dual chest tube insertion achieves greater drainage, it comes at the cost of increased time to clear the chest and is associated with worse outcomes in bilateral injuries. One chest tube may be sufficient post-trauma thoracotomy; routine placement of two chest tubes is not recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Equivocal focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examinations confound decision-making for trauma surgeons. We sought to determine whether the equivocal FAST (defined as any nonconcordant result) has a deleterious effect on trauma outcomes. A 2-year review (2014-2015) of all trauma activations at our Level I trauma center was performed. Patients were matched at baseline and FAST results were compared. Outcomes included resuscitation time (h), ventilation days (d), hospital length of stay (HLOS-d), ICU length-of-stay, and survival (%). In addition, skill level of the sonographer was stratified by novice (postgraduate year (PGY) years 1-3) or expert skill levels (PGY-4/fellow or attending). A total of 1,027 patients were included. Compared with concordant FAST examinations, equivocal FASTs were associated with increased HLOS (14.1 vs 10.6, P = 0.05), higher mortality (9.8 vs 3.7%, P = 0.02), decreased positive predictive value in the right upper quadrant (RUQ) (55 vs 79%, P = 0.02) and left upper quadrant (LUQ) (50 vs 83%, P < 0.01) and significantly decreased specificity in the thoracic (83 vs 98%), RUQ (80 vs 98%), LUQ (86 vs 99%), and pelvic (88 vs 98%) windows (P < 0.01 for all). A trend of greater positive predictive value in the thoracic window (100 vs 81%, P = 0.09) among PGY-4/fellow and attending providers compared with PGY levels 1-3 was observed. Equivocal FASTs portend worse outcomes than concordant FASTs because of high false-negative rates, specifically in the thoracic region and the upper quadrants. Lower thresholds for intervention are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shock Index (SI = heart rate/systolic blood pressure) predicts outcomes among trauma patients. Studies have also shown that the change in SI between the field and Emergency Department (ED) arrival (Delta SI) predicts mortality in trauma. Given the lack of reliable prehospital data, Delta SI may more accurately prognosticate if used within the ED. All trauma patients arriving to our Level I trauma center in 2014 were reviewed. Patients were matched for age, gender, mechanism of injury, and injury severity score. SI and ED Delta SI were calculated. ED Delta SI >0.1 and ≤0.1 defined the study groups. Pregnant patients, pediatric patients, and patients with incomplete data were excluded. Outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, blood products, and mortality. A total of 2591 patients were identified (n = 1294 patients analyzed). After matching, patients with ED Delta SI >0.1 had greater mortality (6.6 vs 2.6%, P = 0.010), need for blood transfusion (1764 vs 565 cc, P < 0.001), and ICU length of stay (5.6 vs 3.8 days, P = 0.014) compared with patients with ED Delta SI ≤0.1. In conclusion, ED Delta SI >0.1 is associated with increased mortality, need for blood transfusion, and ICU length of stay. Delta SI may be superior to traditional SI for trauma outcome prognostication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Albeit low survival rates, resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is considered standard for selected trauma patients. Because it has potential for rapid cardiopulmonary rescue, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may augment RT. The aim of this study was to identify the impact of ECMO on trauma patients that recently underwent RT after injury.Study Design: All patients who underwent RT were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2017). Patients were excluded if they died within 60 minutes, underwent delayed ECMO, and/or had missing data. Delayed ECMO group was defined as those patients undergoing ECMO after 1 hour following RT.Results: Out of 8 694 272 injured patients, 10 106 (.1%) underwent RT. Median age was 31 years [23-45], 86% male. Penetrating injury was the dominant mechanism (62%). Of these, .6% (23) underwent immediate ECMO. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients were significantly younger (23[17-33] vs. 31[23-46], p .003) and had significantly higher chest abbreviated injury scale scores (5[4-5] vs. 3[3-4], P < .001). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients achieved significantly higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation (96% vs. 70%, p .007) and had nonsignificant trend of improved mortality (52% vs. 63%, p .260).Conclusion: Immediate ECMO may be a useful therapeutic modality after RT. It achieves higher ROSC rates with opportunity for improved survival. Future prospective study is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trauma centers are receiving increasing numbers of older trauma patients. There is a lack of literature on the outcomes for elderly trauma patients who undergo damage control laparotomy (DCL). We hypothesized that trauma centers with geriatric protocols would have better outcomes in elderly patients after DCL.Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive adult trauma patients with DCL at 8 level 1 trauma centers was conducted from 2012 to 2018. Patients aged 40 or older were included. Age ≥ 55 years was defined as elderly. Demographics, injury information, clinical outcomes, including mortality, and complications were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.Results: A total of 379 patients with DCLs were identified with an average age of 54.8 ± 0.4 years with 39.3% (n = 149/379) of patients aged ≥ 55. Geriatric protocols or a consulting geriatric service was present at 37.5% (n = 3/8) of institutions. Age ≥ 55 was a significant risk factor for in-hospital mortality (OR 2, 95% CI 1.0-4.0, P = .04). Institutions without dedicated geriatric trauma protocols/services had higher overall in-hospital mortality on both univariate (57.9% vs 34.3%, P = .02) and multivariate analyses (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4, P < .001).Conclusions: Surgical management of older trauma patients remains a challenge. Geriatric protocols or dedicated services were found to be associated with improved outcomes. Future efforts should focus on standardizing the availability of these resources at trauma centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focused assessment with Sonography for trauma (FAST) examination is essential to trauma triage. We sought to determine whether FASTs completed early in sequencing portend worse outcomes. A two-year review (2014-2015) of all trauma activations at our Level I trauma center was performed. Patients were matched at baseline and FAST times were compared. Outcomes included resuscitation time (RESUS-h), ventilation days (d), hospital length of stay (HLOS-d), ICU length of stay (LOS-d), survival (%), nosocomial infection rate (%), and venous thromboembolism complication rate (%). ED interventions included transfusions, crystalloid, antibiotics, central line placement, intubation, thoracostomy, thoracotomy, pelvic X-ray, and binder. One thousand, three hundred and twelve patients were included for analysis (mean age = 38 ± 19 years, mean Injury Severity Score = 12 ± 11, 21% penetrating). Compared with FASTs completed after the primary survey, early FASTs led to significantly more ventilation days (P < 0.01), longer ICU length of stay (P < 0.01), and a greater incidence of nosocomial infections (P = 0.03). In the ED, early FASTs led to significantly more intubations (P < 0.01) and transfusions (P < 0.01) compared with late FASTs. FASTs completed before primary survey portend worse outcomes, with more ED interventions and equivocal results. FAST as a true adjunct to primary survey is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Angioembolization versus open control of traumatic pelvic hemorrhage is debated. We sought to compare outcomes between angioembolization and open internal iliac artery occlusion. A 14-year retrospective review (2004-2017) was performed at our academic Level I trauma center. All pelvic hemorrhage patients who underwent internal iliac artery angioembolization or silastic loop ligation via laparotomy were compared for outcomes. Patient demographics included vital signs, mechanism, and injury severity score (ISS). Outcomes included mortality (%), operating room visits, reoperation for hemorrhage (%), transfusion burden (units), and infection (%). A total of 163 trauma patients matched for age, ISS, mechanism, and cavitary involvement were included for analysis. Compared with silastic loop ligation (n = 51, mean ISS = 32 ± 14), patients who underwent angioembolization (n = 112, mean ISS = 30 ± 8.9) demonstrated decreased mortality (23% vs 57%, P < 0.01), made fewer operating room trips (mean = 2.2 vs 3.6 trips, P < 0.01), made fewer trips for pelvic (2.8 vs 11%, P = 0.05) and nonpelvic-related bleeding (3.6 vs 22%, P < 0.01), used fewer blood products [packed red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate] (P < 0.01 for all), and indicated a trend toward fewer infections (5.7% vs 14%, P = 0.07). Internal iliac artery angioembolization demonstrates lower mortality, lower reoperation rates, decreased transfusion burden, and a trend toward fewer infections compared with silastic loop ligation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is an uncommon complication of cholelithiasis caused by extrinsic biliary compression by stones in the gallbladder infundibulum or cystic duct. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes associated with a laparoscopic approach to this disease process. This is a 10-year, retrospective study conducted at two academic medical centers with established acute care surgery practices. Patients with a diagnosis of MS confirmed intraoperatively were included. Eighty-eight patients with MS were identified with 55 (62.5%) being type 1. Twenty six (29.5%) patients, all type 1, underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Of the 62 patients that underwent open cholecystectomy, 27.3 per cent had a laparoscopy converted to open procedure. There was no significant difference in overall complications (19.2 vs 29%) among those undergoing laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Length of stay was lower in patients that had a laparoscopic approach (P = 0.001). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can safely be attempted in type 1 MS and seems to be associated with fewer overall complications and shorter length of stay compared with an open approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intraosseous (IO) needle placement is an alternative for patients with difficult venous access. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine indications and outcomes associated with IO use at a Level 1 trauma center (January 2008-May 2015). Data points included demographics, time to insertion, intravenous (IV) access points, indications, infusions, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and mortality. Of 68 patients with IO insertion analyzed (63.2% blunt trauma, 29.4% penetrating trauma, and 7.4% medical), 56 per cent were hypotensive on arrival and 38.2 per cent asystolic. The most common indications for IO infusion were difficult IV access (69%) and rapid sequence intubation (20.6%). The median time to IO access was three minutes. IV access was gained after IO in 72.1 per cent of patients. Through IO access, 30.9 per cent patients received crystalloid, 29.4 per cent received Advanced Care Life Support (ACLS) medications, 25 per cent rapid sequence intubation medications, 20.6 per cent blood products, and 2.9 per cent seizure medications. Overall, 80.9 per cent were intubated in the Emergency Department (ED), 26.5 per cent had ED thoracotomy, and 20.6 per cent had a laparotomy. Median crystalloid infused through IO was 180 cc in pediatric patients and 1 L in adults, respectively. Extravasation, the most common complication, was experienced by 7.4 per cent of patients. Inhospital mortality was 72.9 per cent. IO access should be considered when there is a need for rapid intervention requiring vascular access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although renal trauma is increasingly managed nonoperatively, severe renovascular injuries occasionally require nephrectomy. Long-term outcomes after trauma nephrectomy are unknown. We hypothesized that the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is minimal after trauma nephrectomy. We conducted a retrospective review of the following: 1) our university-based, urban trauma center database; 2) the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB); 3) the National Inpatient Sample (NIS); and 4) the U.S. Renal Data System (USRDS). Data were compiled to estimate the risk of ESRD after trauma nephrectomy in the United States. Of the 232 patients who sustained traumatic renal injuries at our institution from 1998 to 2007,36 (16%) underwent a nephrectomy an average of approximately four nephrectomies per year. The NTDB reported 1780 trauma nephrectomies from 2002 to 2006, an average of 356 per year. The 2005 NIS data estimated that in the United States, over 20,000 nephrectomies are performed annually for renal cell carcinoma. The USRDS annual incidence of ESRD requiring hemodialysis is over 90,000, of which 0.1 per cent (100 per year) of renal failure is the result of traumatic or surgical loss of a kidney. Considering the large number of nephrectomies performed for cancer, we estimated the risk of trauma nephrectomy causing renal failure that requires dialysis to be 0.5 per cent. National data regarding the etiology of renal failure among patients with ESRD reveal a very low incidence of trauma nephrectomy (0.5%) as a cause; therefore, nephrectomy for trauma can be performed with little concern for long-term dialysis dependence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Albeit low survival rates, resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is considered standard for selected trauma patients. Because it has potential for rapid cardiopulmonary rescue, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may augment RT. The aim of this study was to identify the impact of ECMO on trauma patients that recently underwent RT after injury., Study Design: All patients who underwent RT were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2017). Patients were excluded if they died within 60 minutes, underwent delayed ECMO, and/or had missing data. Delayed ECMO group was defined as those patients undergoing ECMO after 1 hour following RT., Results: Out of 8 694 272 injured patients, 10 106 (.1%) underwent RT. Median age was 31 years [23-45], 86% male. Penetrating injury was the dominant mechanism (62%). Of these, .6% (23) underwent immediate ECMO. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients were significantly younger (23[17-33] vs. 31[23-46], p .003) and had significantly higher chest abbreviated injury scale scores (5[4-5] vs. 3[3-4], P < .001). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients achieved significantly higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation (96% vs. 70%, p .007) and had nonsignificant trend of improved mortality (52% vs. 63%, p .260)., Conclusion: Immediate ECMO may be a useful therapeutic modality after RT. It achieves higher ROSC rates with opportunity for improved survival. Future prospective study is warranted.

Angioembolization versus open control of traumatic pelvic hemorrhage is debated. We sought to compare outcomes between angioembolization and open internal iliac artery occlusion. A 14-year retrospective review (2004-2017) was performed at our academic Level I trauma center. All pelvic hemorrhage patients who underwent internal iliac artery angioembolization or silastic loop ligation via laparotomy were compared for outcomes. Patient demographics included vital signs, mechanism, and injury severity score (ISS). Outcomes included mortality (%), operating room visits, reoperation for hemorrhage (%), transfusion burden (units), and infection (%). A total of 163 trauma patients matched for age, ISS, mechanism, and cavitary involvement were included for analysis. Compared with silastic loop ligation (n = 51, mean ISS = 32 ± 14), patients who underwent angioembolization (n = 112, mean ISS = 30 ± 8.9) demonstrated decreased mortality (23% vs 57%, P < 0.01), made fewer operating room trips (mean = 2.2 vs 3.6 trips, P < 0.01), made fewer trips for pelvic (2.8 vs 11%, P = 0.05) and nonpelvic-related bleeding (3.6 vs 22%, P < 0.01), used fewer blood products [packed red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate] ( P < 0.01 for all), and indicated a trend toward fewer infections (5.7% vs 14%, P = 0.07). Internal iliac artery angioembolization demonstrates lower mortality, lower reoperation rates, decreased transfusion burden, and a trend toward fewer infections compared with silastic loop ligation.

Draining the chest cavity with two chest tubes after thoracotomy for trauma is controversial. This article aims to determine whether using two tubes after thoracotomy for trauma is more effective than using a single tube. A 9-year retrospective review (2007-2015) was performed at our academic level I trauma center. All patients who underwent trauma thoracotomy (unilateral and bilateral) were included for analysis (n = 99). Patients with incomplete data, pediatric patients (age < 18), pregnant patients, and early deaths (<24 hours) were excluded. When analyzed by chest cavity, dual tubes have increased drainage bilaterally (P = 0.008) and require more days to clear the right chest (P = 0.002). Patients with dual tubes bilaterally are associated with increased intensive care unit length of stay (P = 0.05) and ventilator days (P = 0.04). Although dual chest tube insertion achieves greater drainage, it comes at the cost of increased time to clear the chest and is associated with worse outcomes in bilateral injuries. One chest tube may be sufficient post-trauma thoracotomy; routine placement of two chest tubes is not recommended.