Search

The management of a rare midclavicular crossbow bolt injury to the subclavian artery is discussed. Important concepts include the initial clinical diagnosis, operative planning, the surgical approach to the retro-clavicular great vessels, the technical aspects of repair, and postoperative course. A discussion of the reasoning behind an operative vs. endovascular approach is also discussed.

Background: A national analysis of clavicle fractures is lacking and the risk of concomitant axillosubclavian vessel injury (ASVI) in patients with clavicle fractures is unknown. A minority of patients may have a combined brachial plexus injury (BPI). We sought to describe risk factors for concomitant ASVI in patients with a clavicle fracture; hypothesizing patients with combined clavicle fracture and BPI has a higher risk of ASVI., Methods: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for blunt trauma patients with a clavicle fracture. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine risk factors for ASVI. A subset analysis on patients with isolated clavicle fractures was additionally performed., Results: From 59 198 patients with clavicle fractures, 341 (.6%) had concomitant ASVI. Compared to patients without ASVI, patients with ASVI had a higher median injury severity score (24 vs. 17, P < .001) and rates of pulmonary contusions (43.4% vs. 37.7%, P = .029) and BPI (18.2% vs. .4%, P < .001). After controlling for associated chest wall injuries and humerus fracture, the BPI odds ratio (OR 49.17, 35.59-67.92, P < .001) was independently associated with risk for ASVI. In a subset analysis of isolated clavicle fractures, BPI remained associated with risk of ASVI (OR 60.01, confidence intervals 25.29-142.39, P < .001)., Conclusion: The rate of concomitant ASVI in patients with a clavicle fracture is <1%. Patients presenting with a clavicle fracture had a high rate of injuries including pulmonary contusion. Patients with findings suggestive of underlying BPI had a nearly 50 times increased associated risk of ASVI. Thus, a detailed physical exam in this setting including brachial-brachial index appears warranted.

The objective of this study is to describe the contemporary management of proximal upper extremity and neck arterial injuries by comparing open and endovascular repair at a single institution. This is a retrospective study of 22 patients that sustained subclavian, axillary, and carotid artery injuries from 2011 to 2016 that were managed with open or endovascular repair. There were nine subclavian, eight axillary, and five carotid artery injuries of which 10 (45.5%) underwent endovascular repair and 12 (54.5%) underwent open repair. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups including injury severity score or preoperative hypotension. There were no deaths in the endovascular group, and three (25.0%) deaths in the open group. All patients in the endovascular group were discharged home. In the open group, seven (58.3%) patients had at least one inpatient complication with a mean of 1.1 (standard deviation 1.4) complications per patient. In the endovascular group, there were three (30.0%) patients with inpatient complications and a mean of 0.4 (standard deviation 0.7) complications per patient (P = 0.18). Endovascular management of nonaortic cervicothoracic arterial injuries was successfully performed in hypotensive patients and patients with other life threatening traumatic injuries. Further studies are warranted to look at long-term patency of these repairs and to help develop a protocol to guide decision-making in the management of cervicothoracic injuries.

Injuries of the subclavian and proximal axillary arteries are potentially devastating but account for a minority of vascular injuries presenting to trauma centers in the United States. We have reviewed our recent experience with management of subclavian and axillary artery injuries in a state-designated level 1 academic trauma center and report four cases that illustrate the typical arterial injury patterns and the entire therapeutic armamentarium in its current iteration. Subclavian and proximal axillary artery injuries present as interesting surgical problems. A high index of suspicion for vascular injuries should be maintained given the mechanism and proximity to major vasculature. Consideration should always be given to the least invasive treatment options in stable patients. Awareness of multiple therapeutic modalities and indications for each should be an integral part of every surgeon's armamentarium. As with all vascular intervention, eventual failure is the rule rather than the exception; therefore, plans for longitudinal surveillance should be made independent of the technique used to treat the injury.

Penetrating injuries of the subclavian artery are rare; however, the associated morbidity and mortality may be high. Retrospective data on 25 patients who sustained penetrating subclavian artery injuries are reported. Diagnosis of subclavian artery injuries was made clinically and was followed by expedient surgical exploration in 65.4 per cent of patients. Patients who were hemodynamically unstable at presentation (26.9%) underwent immediate operation. The remaining hemodynamically stable group of patients with hard signs indicative of vascular injury were also expediently taken to the operating room after initial evaluation and resuscitation. Angiographic evaluation was performed in 34.6 per cent of patients who were stable hemodynamically. Preoperative angiography localized the injury and helped in planning the optimal incision and approach to obtain vascular control. Vascular flow was reestablished in all patients operated except for three who underwent ligation of subclavian artery. Limb salvage rate was 100 per cent, and operative mortality was less than 5 per cent. Morbidity was related to hemodynamic stability at presentation and associated injuries. A low morbidity and mortality rate was achieved by aggressive initial resuscitation and early surgical intervention coupled with selective use of preoperative angiography in hemodynamically stable patients.

Our objective was to evaluate whether physical examination in conjunction with chest X-ray can accurately diagnose the presence of significant vascular injury in penetrating periclavicular trauma. Results from a management protocol for penetrating periclavicular trauma were reviewed for the period January 1992 through December 1996 at an urban Level I trauma center. All patients requiring angiography for periclavicular penetrating trauma with trajectory of the injury falling between the lateral border of the manubrium and the anterior axillary line were entered into the management protocol. All patients underwent anterior-posterior chest radiography on arrival to the trauma center and 6 hours after admission. Tube thoracostomy was placed if clinically indicated on presentation or for X-ray findings. Clinical assessment was performed on all patients, with emphasis placed on the presence of "hard" signs for vascular injury. In addition to accepted hard signs for vascular injury, significant chest tube output (>1000 cc) and chest X-ray findings consistent with significant hemorrhage were also considered hard signs for vascular injury. Assuming hemodynamic stability, all patients with suspected subclavian/axillary arterial injury based on wound trajectory or clinical findings consistent with vascular injury underwent angiography. Forty-six patients were entered into the protocol with 30 left-sided injuries and 16 right sided injuries. The majority of injuries were secondary to gunshot wounds (31), with 14 stab wounds and 1 shotgun injury. Emergency room chest X-ray results revealed 32 negative chest X-rays, 7 pneumothoraces, 2 hemopneumothoraces, 2 hemothoraces, and 3 chest tubes placed before initial chest X-ray. A total of 7 injuries were diagnosed, with 1 missed injury, resulting in a sensitivity of 86 per cent for clinical assessment. The missed injury was a pseudoaneurysm of an axillary artery secondary to a self-inflicted shotgun wound. One mortality occurred in this series, which was a death in the operating room secondary to blood loss from an axillary artery injury. We conclude that clinical assessment can adequately diagnose the presence of surgically significant vascular injury in periclavicular penetrating injuries with trajectories lateral to the manubrium.

Thirty-two consecutive patients with subclavian artery injuries were evaluated to assess the mechanism of injury, types of repair, and results. In this series, most wounds were from firearms. Although the mortality was high (19%), most patients had the vessel repaired successfully. Associated injuries, especially to neural structures, led to significant morbidity. Principles used in dealing with these injuries should be 1) proximal and distal control prior to exposing the injury site, 2) reestablishing distal circulation through primary repair or graft placement, and 3) identifying and treating associated injuries.

Injury to the innominate or subclavian artery is an uncommon but difficult management problem. Review of trauma admissions from August 1983 to August 1992 revealed 21 patients who sustained injury to the innominate or subclavian artery. Eight patients sustained blunt trauma, while 13 patients sustained penetrating injuries. The mechanism of injury was variable, and associated injuries were common in both blunt and penetrating trauma. Injuries involved the right innominate or subclavian artery in 10 patients and the left subclavian artery in 11 patients. Twenty patients were managed operatively. Primary repair was preferred for penetrating injuries, whereas a bypass graft was more common for blunt injuries (P = 0.41). Patients with penetrating injury were more unstable at presentation (admission systolic blood pressure 73 mm Hg vs 119 mm Hg, P = 0.006; preoperative evaluation time 66 min vs 319 min, P = 0.002) and required more blood transfusions (5 units vs 26 units, P = 0.007) than patients with blunt injuries. Mortality for the entire series was 24 per cent (0% blunt vs 38% penetrating, P = 0.047). Hospital days (28 vs 48) and ICU days (8 vs 14) were longer for survivors of penetrating injuries (P = NS). Complications were common in both groups. Innominate/subclavian artery injury remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity.

Arterial injuries of the thoracic outlet are complex and require a precise plan for adequate management and prompt exposure of injured vessels. Our 10-year experience with 28 such injuries is reviewed. Arteriography was performed whenever possible in stable patients (15) and aided in planning the operative approach. Unstable patients with active bleeding, pulsatile or expanding hematoma, or pulse deficit were taken to the operating room without delay. A thoracic approach was required in 15 patients, and the exposure was extrathoracic in 12 patients. Airway was secured with liberal use of emergency endotracheal intubation (16 patients). Primary repair was possible in 16 patients, with grafting performed in eight and ligation in three. One vertebral artery injury was successfully controlled with embolization. Venous injuries were repaired in six patients and ligation was necessary in eight; there was no significant morbidity. Two patients died in this series from complications of severe hemorrhage. Significant morbidity was encountered from associated neurologic injuries in 15 patients. Stroke was evident in two patients, both of whom were moribund preoperatively. Proximal subclavian artery injuries were particularly more problematic and frequently required an interim anterior thoracotomy for early control of exsanguinating hemorrhage. Our philosophy in the management of these injuries and choices of exposure are discussed in detail.

This retrospective review was carried out to see if there is any role for selective management for intimal arterial injuries found in the extremities. The study involved retrospective analysis of arterial injuries seen in the extremities during the past four years. A total of 49 vascular injuries were identified which were proved by angiographic finding. There were eight cases which involved intimal injury in the nature of intimal irregularity or a flap seen in the angiogram. Four of these cases were treated surgically. There were four cases treated by conservative follow-up with the patient being placed either on low molecular weight dextran and/or low-dose intravenous heparin if there were no contraindications for the above. All of these patients had a successful outcome with normal angiographic findings of the injured area. The angiograms were done a few weeks following the injuries. The decision to treat conservatively was based on the nature of the injury as well as location of the injury, in one case being the origin of the anterior tibial artery, which is difficult to explore surgically. In conclusion, we believe that in selected instances where there is no distal vascular insufficiency because of the injury or if the patient has a lesion in a surgically difficult area to explore or if there are any other serious life-threatening injuries, the intimal artery injury can be managed conservatively. This also avoids the morbidity and mortality associated with surgical intervention.

Blunt injuries to aortic arch branches are encountered with increasing frequency. From 1976 to 1980 20 patients with 26 cervicomediastinal arterial injuries were treated. Physical findings varied depending on the vessel injured: all subclavian artery injuries had positive signs, one carotid artery injury had a bruit as the only finding, and injuries to the innominate artery had no positive physical findings. Angiographic examination was performed in all patients when findings suggested vascular injury or there was a high index of suspicion based on patient history, widened mediastinum, or first rib fracture. Vessels injured included the subclavian (13 instances), carotid (five instances), innominate (five instances) and vertebral (three instances). In injured vertebral arteries were ligated. Innominate artery wounds were reconstructed using Dacron grafts; the remainder were excised in the area of intimal damage with primary anastomosis or interposition of a saphenous vein graft. There were no deaths or major vascular complications. Three patients, each, have major upper extremity neurologic deficits due to brachial plexus stretch injuries.

The problems of surgical management of injury to blood vessels of the thoracic outlet are illustrated by a case report of clavicular excision to gain direct access to the damaged vessels. The article reviews the surgical procedure and documents its efficacy and the lack of subsequent deformity or dysfunction. It recounts the hazards of unsuccessful attempts to repair the clavicle. Last, it discusses the beneficial effects of clavicular resection carried out for reasons other than vascular injury.