Search

Although obesity predisposes to postoperative pulmonary complications, data on the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and peri-operative respiratory performance are limited. We prospectively studied the impact of spinal anaesthesia, obesity and vaginal surgery on lung volumes measured by spirometry in 28 patients with BMI 30-40 kg.m(-2) and in 13 patients with BMI > or = 40 kg.m(-2). Vital capacity, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, mid-expiratory and peak expiratory flows were measured during the pre-operative visit (baseline), after effective spinal anaesthesia with premedication, and after the operation at 20 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h (after mobilisation). Spinal anaesthesia and premedication were associated with a significant decrease in spirometric parameters. Spinal anaesthesia and premedication were associated with a significant decrease in spirometric parameters; mean (SD) vital capacities were - 19% (6.4) in patients with BMI 30-40 kg.m(-2) and - 33% (9.0) in patients with BMI > 40 kg.m(-2). The decrease of lung volumes remained constant for 2 h, whereas 3 h after the operation and after mobilisation, spirometric parameters significantly improved in all patients. This study showed that both spinal anaesthesia and obesity significantly impaired peri-operative respiratory function.

Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section has gained widespread acceptance. We assessed the impact of spinal anaesthesia and body mass index (BMI) on spirometric performance. In this prospective study, we consecutively assessed 71 consenting parturients receiving spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl for elective Caesarean section. We performed spirometry during the antepartum visit (baseline), immediately after spinal anaesthesia, 10-20 min, 1 h, 2 h after the operation, and after mobilisation (3 h). Baseline values were within normal ranges. There was a significant decrease in all spirometric parameters after effective spinal anaesthesia that persisted throughout the study period. The decrease in respiratory function was significantly greater in obese (BMI > 30 kg x m(-2)) than in normal-weight parturients (BMI < 25 kg x m(-2)), e.g. median (IQR) vital capacity directly after spinal anaesthesia; -24 (-16 to -31)% vs. -11 (-6 to -16)%, p < 0.001 and recovery was significantly slower. We conclude that both spinal anaesthesia and obesity significantly impair respiratory function in parturients.

Lumbar epidural analgesia during labour has gained widespread acceptance. The impact of epidural analgesia based on mixtures of low-dose local anaesthetic solutions and lipophilic opioids on most clinically relevant obstetric outcomes is minimal. Since the pregnant state per se is associated with important alterations in respiration, we assessed whether a subtle degree of motor blockade brought about by epidural analgesia might compromise respiratory function as assessed by spirometry. Sixty consenting parturients receiving epidural analgesia were consecutively included in this prospective study. We performed spirometry during the antepartum visit and in labour after effective epidural analgesia was established; at both assessments the women were pain-free. Values were within normal ranges but increased significantly after effective epidural analgesia; median (IQR [range]) increase for vital capacity 7.4 (3.0-13 [-12-27])% (p < 0.001); forced vital capacity 4.4 (1.7-9.8 [-13-26])% (p < 0.001); forced expiratory volume in 1 s 5.5 (1.7-8.6 [-14-28])% (p < 0.001); and peak expiratory flow rate 2.3 (-1.6-5.8 [-18-16])% (p = 0.01)). We conclude that epidural analgesia for labour significantly improved respiratory function.

Several cases have been reported recently in which symptoms suggestive of transient radicular irritation occurred following the use of hyperbaric 5% lignocaine for spinal anaesthesia. We report on three patients in whom we observed similar symptoms attributable to this kind of radicular irritation following uneventful spinal anaesthesia using isobaric 2% lignocaine. All three patients underwent minor gynaecological procedures and developed burning pains in the buttocks within 24 h of surgery. The long-term outcome was not clear for all the patients, but in at least one the pain disappeared.