Search

In-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery ranges from 2% to 8%. Many patients suffer from major adverse cardiovascular events, e.g. myocardial infarction, which in the long term can result in severe limitations in routine activities. Troponin plays the central role in identifying myocardial infarction; however, interpretation after cardiac surgery is difficult due to ischemia reperfusion injury and direct surgical trauma. Thus, the distinction between procedure-related myocardial injury and additional myocardial injury due to a new event is difficult. The fourth universal definition of type 5 myocardial infarction uses the 10 × upper limit of normal (ULN) as cut-off and notably > 90% of patients after on-pump procedures exceed this cut-off. Clinical consequences are mostly unclear. The dynamics of copeptin and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) concentrations start very early, i.e. several hours before troponin. The characteristics of copeptin and H‑FABP might help to overcome the limitations of troponin. This short narrative review gives a concise overview on this topic. Moreover, a brief view of future perspectives in this field is given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Anaesthesist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Perioperative cardioprotection aims to minimize the consequences of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. These strategies appear particularly relevant for anesthesia provision during on-pump cardiac surgery but they potentially affect any cause of perioperative myocardial ischemia. In recent years, several pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies of cardioprotection have been explored. Results from studies in isolated tissue and animal experiments are promising; however, translation of myocardial conditioning strategies to the clinical setting has been disappointing: in large trials cardioprotective interventions failed to significantly improve outcome., Objective: This review aims to provide an overview of the current experimental evidence regarding pharmacological and nonpharmacological cardioprotection. Moreover, it discusses reasons why translation from bench to bedside is hampered by potential confounders and suggests future approaches that might overcome these limitations., Material and Methods: Narrative review., Results and Conclusion: Results of experimental studies are convincing but translation into clinical practice remains challenging. Several confounders have been identified contributing to the mainly inconclusive results from clinical studies, such as comorbidities and comedications, choice of anesthetic regimen and also methodological issues. Carefully designed clinical trials in well-defined patient cohorts evaluating combinations of protective strategies targeting different pathways and cell types might support bench to bedside translation.