Search

The implementation of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) in liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) workflows has become a valuable tool for improving compound annotation in metabolomics analyses by increasing peak capacity and by adding a new molecular descriptor, the collision cross section (CCS). Although some studies reported high repeatability and reproducibility of CCS determination and only few studies reported good interplatform agreement for small molecules, standardized protocols are still missing due to the lack of reference CCS values and reference materials. We present a comparison of CCS values of approximatively one hundred lipid species either commercially available or extracted from human plasma. We used three different commercial ion mobility technologies from different laboratories, drift tube IMS (DTIMS), travelling wave IMS (TWIMS) and trapped IMS (TIMS), to evaluate both instrument repeatability and interlaboratory reproducibility. We showed that CCS discrepancies of 0.3% (average) could occur depending on the data processing software tools. Moreover, eleven CCS calibrants were evaluated yielding mean RSD below 2% for eight calibrants, ESI Low concentration tuning mix (Tune Mix) showing the lowest RSD (< 0.5%) in both ion modes. Tune Mix calibrated CCS from the three different IMS instruments proved to be well correlated and highly reproducible (R 2  > 0.995 and mean RSD ≤ 1%). More than 90% of the lipid CCS had deviations of less than 1%, demonstrating high comparability between techniques, and the possibility to use the CCS as molecular descriptor. We highlighted the need of standardized procedures for calibration, data acquisition, and data processing. This work demonstrates that using harmonized analytical conditions are required for interplatform reproducibility for CCS determination of human plasma lipids., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Collision cross sections (CCS) have been described as relevant molecular descriptors in metabolomics and lipidomics analyses for ascertaining compound identity. Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) allows to determine CCS with different techniques, such as drift tube ion mobility spectrometry (DTIMS), traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS) or trapped ion mobility spectrometry (TIMS). In contrast with DTIMS where CCS can be obtained directly with measured drift times and mathematical relationship, TWIMS and TIMS techniques require an additional step of calibration to obtain CCS values. However, literature reports significantly disparate CCS values depending on the calibrant used (often more than 10%), as no consensus has been reached to define a universal CCS reference standard or harmonized calibration procedure. Therefore, publicly available CCS databases cannot be regarded as readily interoperable and exchangeable. Here, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of 11 distinct CCS calibrants in a traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (TWIMS-MS) instrument. We showed that, using lipids from plasma as model compounds, CCS determination drastically fluctuates from one calibrant to the other with up to 25% differences, which precludes direct CCS comparison. Using the large panel of calibration curves generated, we showed that any CCS value can be efficiently re-calibrated relatively to the calibration curve made with the widely used Tune Mix solution whatever the calibration procedure originally used. The re-calibrated CCS values for each calibrant constitute a database which allows to correct any deviation on lipid CCS values whatever the calibrant originally used. Resulting corrected CCS values from plasma lipids were thus efficiently matched to those previously reported in the literature (with deviations<2%). Therefore, this work shows that unique and comparable CCS values can be obtained upon re-calibration relatively to Tune Mix CCS values, while also paving the way for the establishment of a universal CCS database of various metabolite or lipid classes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)