1. An online educational model in andrology for student training in the art of scientific writing in the COVID-19 pandemic
- Author
-
Mohamed Arafa, Ahmad Majzoub, Haitham Elbardisi, Pedro Oliveira, Ashok Agarwal, Sajal Gupta, Damayanthi Durairajanayagam, Rakesh Sharma, Kristian Leisegang, Renata Finelli, Pallav Sengupta, Manesh Kumar Panner Selvam, Ralf Henkel, Catalina Barbarosie, Sulagna Dutta, Shubhadeep Roychoudhury, Marco G. Alves, and Peter Natesan Pushparaj
- Subjects
Male ,Models, Educational ,Urology ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Context (language use) ,andrology ,Medical writing ,Plagiarism ,Formative assessment ,Andrology ,Education, Distance ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endocrinology ,Mentorship ,Scientific writing ,Internship ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Humans ,goals ,Students ,Pandemics ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,research internship ,Soft skills ,Mentors ,scientific writing ,COVID-19 ,General Medicine ,Original Articles ,Social engagement ,Medical Writing ,Videoconferencing ,Female ,Original Article ,Educational Measurement ,Psychology - Abstract
In 2020, the COVID‐19 pandemic led to the suspension of the annual Summer Internship at the American Center for Reproductive Medicine (ACRM). To transit it into an online format, an inaugural 6‐week 2020 ACRM Online Mentorship Program was developed focusing on five core pillars of andrology research: scientific writing, scientific methodology, plagiarism understanding, soft skills development and mentee basic andrology knowledge. This study aims to determine mentee developmental outcomes based on student surveys and discuss these within the context of the relevant teaching and learning methodology. The mentorship was structured around scientific writing projects established by the team using a student‐centred approach, with one‐on‐one expert mentorship through weekly formative assessments. Furthermore, weekly online meetings were conducted, including expert lectures, formative assessments and social engagement. Data were collected through final assessments and mentee surveys on mentorship outcomes. Results show that mentees (n = 28) reported a significant (p
- Published
- 2020