Search

BACKGROUND Drugs with a central alpha 2-adrenergic action can increase the threshold for halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias. Recently, imidazoline-preferring receptors were shown to play a significant role in the hypotensive effect of alpha 2-adrenergic agonists containing an imidazole ring in their structure. To address the question of whether the antiarrhythmic property of the alpha 2-adrenergic agonists was caused by activation of alpha 2-adrenoceptors or imidazoline-preferring receptors in the central nervous system, the effect of an imidazoline (atipamezole) and a nonimidazoline (L-659,066 and yohimbine) alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist were examined as etiologic factors in the genesis of halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias in dogs. METHODS Adult mongrel dogs were anesthetized with halothane (1.3%) and monitored continuously for systemic arterial pressure and for premature ventricular contractions. The arrhythmogenic dose (AD) of epinephrine, defined as the smallest dose producing four or more premature ventricular contractions within a 15-s period, was determined in the presence of atipamezole (an imidazoline compound that acrosses the blood-brain barrier), L-659,066 (a nonimidazoline compound that does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier), and yohimbine (a nonimidazoline compound that passes the blood-brain barrier). These drugs were administered either intravenously or into the cisterna magna to assess the site of action for changes in responsiveness. RESULTS Intravenous atipamezole decreased the AD of epinephrine in the dose-dependent fashion. However, neither L-659,066 nor yohimbine, administered peripherally, decreased the AD of epinephrine. Central administration of atipamezole also decreased the AD of epinephrine, while L-659,066, even if administered centrally, did not affect the AD of epinephrine in the presence of halothane. CONCLUSIONS Because the imidazoline ring-containing alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist (atipamezole) potentiated the halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias and the nonimidazole alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist (L-659,066 and yohimbine) did not, it is possible that the imidazoline-preferring, rather than the alpha 2-adrenergic, receptor is responsible for the antiarrhythmic property of alpha 2-adrenergic agonists.

BACKGROUND alpha 2 Adrenoceptors in the central nervous system mediate various physiologic processes, including cardiovascular control. Recently, some of these actions have been reported to be mediated by a nonadrenergic receptor, namely an imidazoline receptor. The authors previously reported that dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2 agonist, prevents the genesis of halothane-epinephrine dysrhythmias through a central mechanism. Because dexmedetomidine also binds to imidazoline receptors, we performed the current study to examine the precise receptor mechanism involved in the antidysrhythmic property of dexmedetomidine. METHODS Adult mongrel dogs were anesthetized with halothane (1.3%) and monitored continuously for systemic arterial pressure and premature ventricular contractions. The dysrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine was defined as the smallest dose producing four or more premature ventricular contractions within 15-s period. We examined the antidysrhythmic action of dexmedetomidine in the presence of two kinds of alpha 2 antagonists, that is, agents that label imidazoline receptors and exert a pharmacologic action through imidazoline receptors (idazoxan and atipamezole) and agents that are nonimidazoline compounds and are lacking in pharmacologic action through imidazoline receptors (rauwolscine and L-659,066). They were given cerebroventricularly. RESULTS Idazoxan and atipamezole significantly inhibited the antidysrhythmic action of dexmedetomidine, whereas rauwolscine and L-659,066 did not. CONCLUSIONS Because alpha 2 antagonists having imidazoline or imidazole structures inhibited the antidysrhythmic action of dexmedetomidine, and the inhibition produced by the non-imidazoline alpha 2 antagonists was not significant, imidazoline receptors in the central nervous system are more responsible for the antidysrhythmic action of dexmedetomidine than are alpha 2 adrenoceptors.

Dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist, can prevent the genesis of halothane/epinephrine dysrhythmias through the central nervous system. Because stimulation of alpha 2 adrenoceptors in the central nervous system enhances vagal neural activity and vagal stimulation is known to inhibit digitalis-induced dysrhythmias, dexmedetomidine may exert the antidysrhythmic property through vagal stimulation. To address this hypothesis, the effect of dexmedetomidine in vagotomized dogs was examined and compared with that in intact dogs. In addition, the effect of vagotomy on the antidysrhythmic action of doxazosin, an alpha 1 antagonist, was studied.Adult mongrel dogs were anesthetized with halothane (1.3%) and monitored continuously for systemic arterial pressure and premature ventricular contractions. Animals were divided into two groups receiving bilateral vagotomy or sham operation. The dysrhythmia threshold was expressed by the dysrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine, defined as the smallest dose producing four or more premature ventricular contractions within a 15-s period, and plasma concentration of epinephrine at the time when the dysrhythmogenic dose was reached. The threshold was determined in the presence of dexmedetomidine (a selective alpha 2 agonist that crosses the blood-brain barrier) and doxazosin (a selective alpha 1 antagonist that does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier) in the two groups. In addition, the effect of dexmedetomidine in the presence of atropine methylnitrate instead of vagotomy was examined.Vagotomy did not affect the basal vulnerability to halothane/epinephrine dysrhythmias significantly. Although dexmedetomidine dose-dependently prevented the genesis of the dysrhythmias in intact dogs, the beneficial effect of dexmedetomidine was abolished in both the vagotomized and the atropine-treated dogs. On the other hand, vagotomy did not change the antidysrhythmic property of doxazosin.The vagus nerve plays an important role in the prevention of halothane/epinephrine dysrhythmias by dexmedetomidine in dogs. However, resting vagal tone neither modulates the onset of halothane/epinephrine dysrhythmias nor affects the antidysrhythmic action of doxazosin.

Background The autonomic nervous system plays a critical role in the central modulation of cardiac dysrhythmias. Because sympathetic blockade by thoracic epidural anesthesia has been documented to protect patients from various stress responses, the authors speculate that epidural anesthesia can attenuate the dysrhythmogenic interaction between halothane and epinephrine. Methods In adult mongrel dogs anesthetized with halothane, the dysrhythmogenic dose (DD) of epinephrine, defined as the smallest dose producing four or more premature ventricular contractions within a 15-s period, was determined in the presence of thoracic epidural mepivacaine or saline. To address the effect of circulating mepivacaine after epidural administration, the authors examined the DD of epinephrine in the presence of intravenous mepivacaine. They also investigated the effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia in bilaterally vagotomized dogs. Results Epidural mepivacaine significantly increased the DD of epinephrine compared with epidural saline. However, intravenous mepivacaine did not affect the DD of epinephrine, even when the plasma concentration of mepivacaine during the dysrhythmias was twice that in the epidural mepivacaine group. The beneficial effect of epidural mepivacaine was not seen in bilaterally vagotomized dogs. Conclusions Thoracic epidural anesthesia attenuated the myocardial sensitization by halothane, and vagal activity had an essential role in this action.

Although propofol is a widely used intravenous anesthetic, its effect on epinephrine-induced arrhythmias remains unknown. This study examined the possible interaction between propofol and epinephrine that might affect the induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs. The arrhythmogenic threshold of epinephrine was determined during anesthesia with halothane alone, propofol alone, etomidate alone, or etomidate plus varying doses of propofol. The arrhythmogenic dose and the corresponding plasma concentration of epinephrine during propofol anesthesia (blood propofol concentration 18.0 +/- 0.98 micrograms/ml) were 2.52 +/- 0.43 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and 23.6 +/- 8.5 ng/ml, respectively. During halothane anesthesia (end-tidal 1.3 MAC), they were 2.66 +/- 0.21 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and 35.7 +/- 1.9 ng/ml, respectively. During etomidate anesthesia, they were 9.67 +/- 1.06 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and 205 +/- 27.5 ng/ml, respectively. The dose-effect relationship for propofol was examined during etomidate plus propofol anesthesia. Propofol reduced the arrhythmogenic plasma concentration of epinephrine in a concentration-dependent manner: at blood propofol concentrations of 2.33 +/- 0.46, 5.46 +/- 0.71, and 11.2 +/- 0.81 micrograms/ml, the corresponding plasma epinephrine concentrations were 182.6 +/- 52.5, 89.0 +/- 28.8, and 26.6 +/- 6.9 ng/ml, respectively. These results suggest that propofol enhances epinephrine-induced arrhythmias in a dose-dependent manner in dogs.

The authors investigated myocardial epinephrine sensitization by subanesthetic concentrations of halothane. The dose-response relationship for the action of halothane was examined with etomidate plus varying subanesthetic concentrations of halothane in dogs. The arrhythmogenic threshold of epinephrine was decreased in a dose-dependent manner at end-tidal concentrations of halothane between 0.1 and 0.3%. At end-tidal halothane is greater than 0.3%, and no further reduction of arrhythmogenic threshold of epinephrine occurred. The plasma concentrations of epinephrine producing four or more premature ventricular contractions in 15 s were 201.3 +/- 34.3, 98.1 +/- 13.9, 60.3 +/- 8.63, 57.9 +/- 12.8, 54.5 +/- 8.61, and 53.9 +/- 4.86 ng/ml (mean +/- SEM), at 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5% of halothane at end-tidal concentrations, respectively. The results suggest that in the presence of etomidate, halothane produces myocardial sensitization to epinephrine at subanesthetic concentrations as low as 0.1%. Increasing halothane to 0.3% produces a further reduction in the arrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine.

This study examined the interaction between thiopental and epinephrine in inducing ventricular arrhythmias in dogs. The arrhythmogenic threshold of epinephrine was determined during anesthesia with either halothane alone, thiopental alone, etomidate plus different doses of thiopental, or halothane plus different doses of thiopental. The arrhythmogenic dose and the corresponding plasma concentration of epinephrine during thiopental anesthesia (plasma thiopental concentration: 46-57 micrograms/ml) were 0.77 +/- 0.04 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and 10.7 +/- 1.5 ng/ml, respectively. During halothane anesthesia (end-tidal: 1.3 MAC) they were 2.59 +/- 0.49 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and 45.3 +/- 9.2 ng/ml, respectively. The dose-effect relationship for the thiopental action was examined during etomidate plus thiopental and halothane plus thiopental anesthesia. The arrhythmogenic plasma concentration of epinephrine was inversely proportional to the plasma thiopental concentration during both anesthetics. During etomidate plus thiopental anesthesia, at plasma thiopental concentrations of 0, 11.2 +/- 0.83, 20.1 +/- 1.34, and 33.2 +/- 1.95 micrograms/ml, the corresponding epinephrine concentrations were 201.3 +/- 34.3, 142 +/- 19.5, 69.1 +/- 21.2, and 22.7 +/- 4.5 ng/ml. During halothane plus thiopental anesthesia, at plasma thiopental concentrations of 0, 10 +/- 0.86, 18.3 +/- 0.87, and 31.8 +/- 1.05 micrograms/ml, the corresponding epinephrine concentrations were 45.3 +/- 9.2, 34.6 +/- 8.9, 16.2 +/- 1.74, and 15.1 +/- 1.32 micrograms/ml, respectively. These results suggest that thiopental sensitizes the heart to epinephrine in a dose-dependent manner. This sensitizing action of thiopental would in part explain the thiopental potentiation of hydrocarbon anesthetic-epinephrine arrhythmias.