Search

Because the relative efficacy of antiarrhythmic agents on halothane-epinephrine arrhythmias has not been well characterized, this study was undertaken to comparatively evaluate the antiarrhythmic action of Na(+)-, K(+)- and Ca(2+)-channel blockers on epinephrine-induced ventricular arrhythmias during halothane anesthesia in rats.Rats were anesthetized at random with either halothane (1.5%), isoflurane (2.0%), or pentobarbital (50 mg/kg intraperitoneally), and the lungs were mechanically ventilated with oxygen. The rats were studied in three consecutive protocols. Protocol I determined the arrhythmogenic thresholds of epinephrine during the three types of anesthesia in 33 rats. Protocol II determined the arrhythmogenic thresholds of epinephrine during halothane anesthesia in 64 rats receiving saline (control) or one of five antiarrhythmic agents. Protocol III measured the duration of epinephrine-induced arrhythmias during halothane anesthesia in 42 rats receiving saline (control) or one of five antiarrhythmic agents.In protocol I, the arrhythmogenic doses of epinephrine during halothane, isoflurane, or pentobarbital anesthesia were 1.7 +/- 3.2, 11.1 +/- 0.6, and 39.0 +/- 3.9 micrograms/kg, respectively, and the corresponding plasma concentrations were 4.3 +/- 0.8, 103.7 +/- 9.2, and 246.7 +/- 28.9 ng/ml, respectively. In protocol II, the arrhythmogenic doses were similar in rats receiving saline and in those receiving lidocaine. The arrhythmogenic doses in rats receiving verapamil, flecainide (Na(+)- and K(+)-channel blocker), E-4031 (K(+)-channel blocker), or amiodarone(K(+)-channel blocker with Na(+)-, Ca(2+)-, and beta-blocking activity) increased significantly, i.e., 4.2, 4.2, 5.5, and 31.7 times control (P0.01). In protocol III, lidocaine had no effect on the duration of arrhythmias. Flecainide, E-4031, and verapamil markedly reduced the duration of arrhythmias induced by epinephrine, 8 micrograms/kg intravenously (P0.01), whereas only amiodarone markedly reduced the duration of arrhythmias induced by epinephrine, 16 micrograms/kg intravenously (P0.01).It was concluded that agents with K(+)-channel blocking properties were the most effective in preventing halothane-epinephrine arrhythmias in rats.

Although propofol is a widely used intravenous anesthetic, its effect on epinephrine-induced arrhythmias remains unknown. This study examined the possible interaction between propofol and epinephrine that might affect the induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs. The arrhythmogenic threshold of epinephrine was determined during anesthesia with halothane alone, propofol alone, etomidate alone, or etomidate plus varying doses of propofol. The arrhythmogenic dose and the corresponding plasma concentration of epinephrine during propofol anesthesia (blood propofol concentration 18.0 +/- 0.98 micrograms/ml) were 2.52 +/- 0.43 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and 23.6 +/- 8.5 ng/ml, respectively. During halothane anesthesia (end-tidal 1.3 MAC), they were 2.66 +/- 0.21 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and 35.7 +/- 1.9 ng/ml, respectively. During etomidate anesthesia, they were 9.67 +/- 1.06 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and 205 +/- 27.5 ng/ml, respectively. The dose-effect relationship for propofol was examined during etomidate plus propofol anesthesia. Propofol reduced the arrhythmogenic plasma concentration of epinephrine in a concentration-dependent manner: at blood propofol concentrations of 2.33 +/- 0.46, 5.46 +/- 0.71, and 11.2 +/- 0.81 micrograms/ml, the corresponding plasma epinephrine concentrations were 182.6 +/- 52.5, 89.0 +/- 28.8, and 26.6 +/- 6.9 ng/ml, respectively. These results suggest that propofol enhances epinephrine-induced arrhythmias in a dose-dependent manner in dogs.