Search

The development of methods for the selective acylative kinetic resolution (KR) of tertiary alcohols is a recognised synthetic challenge with relatively few successful substrate classes reported to date. In this manuscript, a highly enantioselective isothiourea‐catalysed acylative KR of tertiary pyrazolone alcohols is reported. The scope and limitations of this methodology have been developed, with high selectivity observed across a broad range of substrate derivatives incorporating varying substitution at N(2)‐, C(4)‐ and C(5)‐, as well as bicyclic constraints within the pyrazolone scaffold (30 examples, selectivity factors (s) typically >100) at generally low catalyst loadings (1 mol %). The application of this KR method to tertiary alcohols derived directly from a natural product (geraniol), alongside pharmaceutically relevant drug compounds (indomethacin, gemfibrozil and probenecid), with high efficiency (s >100) is also described. The KR process is readily amenable to scale up using bench grade solvents and reagents, with effective resolution on a 50 g (0.22 mol) scale demonstrated. The key structural motif leading to excellent selectivity in this KR process has been probed through computation, with an NC=O⋅⋅⋅isothiouronium interaction from substrate to acylated catalyst observed within the favoured transition state. Similarly, the effect of C(5)‐aryl substitution that leads to reduced experimental selectivity is probed, with a competitive π–isothiouronium interaction identified as leading to reduced selectivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of methods to allow the selective acylative dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) of tetra‐substituted lactols is a recognised synthetic challenge. In this manuscript, a highly enantioselective isothiourea‐catalysed acylative DKR of tetra‐substituted morpholinone and benzoxazinone‐derived lactols is reported. The scope and limitations of this methodology have been developed, with high enantioselectivity and good to excellent yields (up to 89 %, 99 : 1 er) observed across a broad range of substrate derivatives incorporating substitution at N(4) and C(2), di‐ and spirocyclic substitution at C(5) and C(6), as well as benzannulation (>35 examples in total). The DKR process is amenable to scale‐up on a 1 g laboratory scale. The factors leading to high selectivity in this DKR process have been probed through computation, with an N−C=O⋅⋅⋅isothiouronium interaction identified as key to producing ester products in highly enantioenriched form. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A general and highly enantioselective method for the preparation of tetra‐substituted 3‐hydroxyphthalide esters via isothiourea‐catalysed acylative dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) is reported. Using (2S,3R)‐HyperBTM (5 mol %) as the catalyst, the scope and limitations of this methodology have been extensively probed, with high enantioselectivity and good to excellent yields observed (>40 examples, up to 99 %, 99 : 1 er). Substitution of the aromatic core within the 3‐hydroxyphthalide skeleton, as well as aliphatic and aromatic substitution at C(3), is readily tolerated. A diverse range of anhydrides, including those from bioactive and pharmaceutically relevant acids, can also be used. The high enantioselectivity observed in this DKR process has been probed computationally, with a key substrate heteroatom donor O⋅⋅⋅acyl‐isothiouronium interaction identified through DFT analysis as necessary for enantiodiscrimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metal‐catalyzed C–N cross‐coupling generally forms C−N bonds by reductive elimination from metal complexes bearing covalent C‐ and N‐ligands. We have identified a Cu‐mediated C–N cross‐coupling that uses a dative N‐ligand in the bond‐forming event, which, in contrast to conventional methods, generates reactive cationic products. Mechanistic studies suggest the process operates via transmetalation of an aryl organoboron to a CuII complex bearing neutral N‐ligands, such as nitriles or N‐heterocycles. Subsequent generation of a putative CuIII complex enables the oxidative C–N coupling to take place, delivering nitrilium intermediates and pyridinium products. The reaction is general for a range of N(sp) and N(sp2) precursors and can be applied to drug synthesis and late‐stage N‐arylation, and the limitations in the methodology are mechanistically evidenced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]