Search

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate safety (infusion‐related reactions [IRRs]) and patient satisfaction (patient‐reported outcomes [PROs]) for at‐home ocrelizumab administration for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: This open‐label study included adult patients with an MS diagnosis who had completed a ≥ 600‐mg ocrelizumab dose, had a patient‐determined disease steps score of 0 to 6 and had completed PROs. Eligible patients received a 600‐mg ocrelizumab home‐based infusion over 2 h, followed by 24‐h and 2‐week post‐infusion follow‐up calls. IRRs and adverse events (AEs) were documented during infusions and follow‐up calls. PROs were completed before and 2 weeks post infusion. Results: Overall, 99 of 100 expected patients were included (mean [SD] age, 42.3 [7.7] years; 72.7% female; 91.9% White). The mean (SD) infusion time was 2.5 (0.6) hours, and 75.8% of patients completed their ocrelizumab infusion between 2 to 2.5 h. The IRR incidence rate was 25.3% (95% CI: 16.7%, 33.8%)—similar to other shorter ocrelizumab infusion studies—and all AEs were mild/moderate. In total, 66.7% of patients experienced AEs, including itch, fatigue, and grogginess. Patients reported significantly increased satisfaction with the at‐home infusion process and confidence in the care provided. Patients also reported a significant preference for at‐home infusion compared with prior infusion center experiences. Interpretation: IRRs and AEs occurred at acceptable rates during in‐home infusions of ocrelizumab over a shorter infusion time. Patients reported increased confidence and comfort with the home infusion process. Findings from this study provide evidence of the safety and feasibility of home‐based ocrelizumab infusion over a shorter infusion period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Studies investigating rates and risk factors for serious safety events (SSEs) during rituximab treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and related disorders are limited. Methods: Rituximab‐treated patients with MS, NMOSD, or related disorders at the Rocky Mountain and New York University MS Care Centers were included. The follow‐up period was defined as the time from the initial dose of rituximab up to 12 months of last dose of rituximab or ocrelizumab (in patients who switched). Clinician‐reported and laboratory data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records. Results: One‐thousand patients were included comprising 907 MS, 77 NMOSD, and 16 related disorders. Patients had a mean follow‐up of 31.1 months and a mean cumulative rituximab dose of 4012 mg. Of the 169 patients who switched to ocrelizumab, the mean ocrelizumab dose was 1141 mg. Crude incidence rate per 1000 person‐years (PY) for lymphopenia was 19.2, neutropenia 5.6, and hypogammaglobulinemia 17.8. Infections resulting in either hospitalization, IV antibiotics, or using antibiotics ≥14 days occurred at a rate of 38.6/1000 PY. Risk factors for infection were duration of therapy, male gender, increased disability, prior exposure to immunosuppression/chemotherapy, lymphopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Particularly, wheelchair‐bound patients had 8.56‐fold increased odds of infections. Crude incidence rates of malignant cancer were 3.5, new autoimmune disease 2.3, thromboembolic event 3.1, and mortality of 5.4 per 1000 PY. Interpretation: Rates of SSEs in patients with MS, NMOSD, and related disorders were low. Through properly assessing risk:benefit of B‐cell depleting therapy in neuroinflammatory disorders and continual monitoring, clinicians may decrease the risk of serious infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Limited comparative effectiveness data for rituximab (RTX) versus natalizumab (NTZ), fingolimod (FTY), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) exist. Methods: Clinician‐reported data on patients prescribed RTX, NTZ, FTY, or DMF for the treatment of MS at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at the University of Colorado were retrospectively collected. Outcomes included a composite effectiveness measure consisting of clinical relapse, contrast‐enhancing lesions, and/or new T2 lesions, individual effectiveness outcomes, and discontinuation. Logistic regression was used on patients matched by propensity scores and using average treatment effect on treated doubly robust weighting estimator. Results: A total of 182, 451, 271, and 342 patients initiated RTX, NTZ, FTY, and DMF and were followed for 2 years. Before and after adjustment, the odds of experiencing disease activity was significantly higher for FTY [adjusted OR (aOR) = 3.17 (95% CI: 1.81–5.55), P < 0.001].and DMF [aOR = 2.68 (95% CI:1.67–4.29), P < 0.001], and similar for NTZ [aOR = 1.36 (95% CI:0.83–2.23), P = 0.216] versus RTX. When examining months 6–24, NTZ demonstrated higher odds of disease activity compared to RTX [aOR = 2.21 (95% CI: 1.20–4.06), P = 0.007]. Similar odds of discontinuation were seen between NTZ and RTX [aOR = 1.39 (95% CI: 0.88–2.20), P = 0.157]; however, FTY [aOR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.24–3.30), P = 0.005] and DMF [aOR = 3.27 (95% CI: 2.15–4.97), P < 0.001] had greater odds of discontinuation than RTX. Interpretation: RTX demonstrated superior effectiveness and discontinuation outcomes compared to FTY and DMF. Although RTX demonstrated similar effectiveness and discontinuation compared to NTZ, RTX had superior effectiveness during months 6–24 and fewer discontinuations when excluding discontinuations due to insurance issues. Results suggest superiority of RTX in reducing disease activity and maintaining long‐term treatment in a real‐world MS cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare 2‐year effectiveness and discontinuation of natalizumab (NTZ) versus fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: Patients prescribed NTZ, FTY, or DMF at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at University of Colorado were identified. Clinician‐reported data were retrospectively collected. Outcomes include a composite effectiveness measure consisting of new T2 lesion, gadolinium‐enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse, individual effectiveness outcomes and discontinuation over 2 years. Logistic regression was used for data analysis on patients matched by propensity scores and using ATT doubly robust weighting estimator. Results: A total of 451, 271, and 342 patients were evaluated on NTZ, FTY, and DMF over 2 years, respectively. Patients had a mean age of 39.8 (NTZ), 42.5(FTY), and 45.8 (DMF) years; were predominantly female (76.7% NTZ; 72.0% FTY; 69.6% DMF); and had a mean MS disease duration of 11–12 years for all groups. At ≤24 months, 22.2%, 34.7%, and 33.6% experienced a new T2 lesion, gadolinium‐enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse on NTZ, FTY, and DMF, respectively. Using ATT doubly robust weighting estimator, FTY versus NTZ and DMF versus NTZ had an odds ratio of 2.00 (95%CI:[1.41–2.85], P < 0.001) and 2.38 [95% CI: 1.68–3.37], P < 0.001) respectively, for experiencing a new T2 lesion, gadolinium enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse. At ≤24 months, 32.6%, 34.3%, and 47.1% discontinued NTZ, FTY, and DMF, respectively. The majority of discontinuations were due to becoming JCV positive(12.6%) for NTZ and due to adverse events for both FTY(17%) and DMF(24.0%). Interpretation: NTZ appears to be more effective and tolerable than FTY and DMF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]