Search

Abstract Background Conversion surgery (CS) is a highly anticipated strategy for stage IV advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with a good response to chemotherapy. However, prognostic factors limiting R0 resection remain unclear. In this multi‐institutional study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of CS for stage IV AGC and the prognostic factors of CS‐limiting R0 resection and analyzed them according to metastatic patterns. Methods Clinical data on 210 patients who underwent CS for stage IV AGC at six institutions between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively retrieved. The patient background, preoperative treatment, operative outcomes, and survival times were recorded. Prognostic factors for overall and recurrence‐free survival were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses for patients who underwent R0 resection. Results R0 resection was achieved in 146 (70%) patients. The median survival time was 32 months, and the 3‐year survival rate was 45%. Patients who achieved R0 resection had significantly longer survival than those with R1/2 resection (median survival time: 41.5 months vs. 20.7 months). Multivariate analysis identified pathological N positivity for overall and relapse‐free survival and pathological T4 for relapse‐free survival as significant independent poor prognostic factors of R0 resected patients. There was no significant difference in survival among the peritoneum, liver, and lymph node groups regarding the initial metastatic sites. Conclusions CS with R0 resection for patients with stage IV AGC can lead to longer survival. Patients with pathological T4 and pathological N positivity were eligible for intensive adjuvant therapy after CS with R0 resection.

Background: Conversion surgery (CS) is a highly anticipated strategy for stage IV advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with a good response to chemotherapy. However, prognostic factors limiting R0 resection remain unclear. In this multi‐institutional study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of CS for stage IV AGC and the prognostic factors of CS‐limiting R0 resection and analyzed them according to metastatic patterns. Methods: Clinical data on 210 patients who underwent CS for stage IV AGC at six institutions between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively retrieved. The patient background, preoperative treatment, operative outcomes, and survival times were recorded. Prognostic factors for overall and recurrence‐free survival were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses for patients who underwent R0 resection. Results: R0 resection was achieved in 146 (70%) patients. The median survival time was 32 months, and the 3‐year survival rate was 45%. Patients who achieved R0 resection had significantly longer survival than those with R1/2 resection (median survival time: 41.5 months vs. 20.7 months). Multivariate analysis identified pathological N positivity for overall and relapse‐free survival and pathological T4 for relapse‐free survival as significant independent poor prognostic factors of R0 resected patients. There was no significant difference in survival among the peritoneum, liver, and lymph node groups regarding the initial metastatic sites. Conclusions: CS with R0 resection for patients with stage IV AGC can lead to longer survival. Patients with pathological T4 and pathological N positivity were eligible for intensive adjuvant therapy after CS with R0 resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aim To establish a new Japanese classification of synchronous peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Methods This multi‐institutional, prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases. Overall survival rates were compared according to the various models using objective indicators. Each model was evaluated by Akaike's information criterion (AIC). The region of peritoneal metastases was evaluated by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Results Between October 2012 and December 2016, 150 patients were enrolled. The AIC of the present Japanese classification was 1020.7. P1 metastasis was defined as confined to two regions. The minimum AIC was obtained with the cutoff number of 10 or less for P2 metastasis and 11 or more for P3 metastasis. As for size, the best discrimination ability between P2 and P3 metastasis was obtained with a cutoff value of 3 cm. The AIC of the proposed classification was 1014.7. The classification was as follows: P0, no peritoneal metastases; P1, metastases localized to adjacent peritoneum (within two regions of PCI); P2, metastases to distant peritoneum, number ≤10 and size ≤3 cm; P3, metastases to distant peritoneum, number ≥11 or size >3 cm; P3a, metastases to distant peritoneum, number ≥11 and size ≤3 cm, or number ≤10 and size >3 cm; P3b, metastases to distant peritoneum, number ≥11 and size >3 cm. Conclusion This objective classification could improve the ability to discriminate prognosis in patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer.

Aim: To establish a new Japanese classification of synchronous peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Methods: This multi‐institutional, prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases. Overall survival rates were compared according to the various models using objective indicators. Each model was evaluated by Akaike's information criterion (AIC). The region of peritoneal metastases was evaluated by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Results: Between October 2012 and December 2016, 150 patients were enrolled. The AIC of the present Japanese classification was 1020.7. P1 metastasis was defined as confined to two regions. The minimum AIC was obtained with the cutoff number of 10 or less for P2 metastasis and 11 or more for P3 metastasis. As for size, the best discrimination ability between P2 and P3 metastasis was obtained with a cutoff value of 3 cm. The AIC of the proposed classification was 1014.7. The classification was as follows: P0, no peritoneal metastases; P1, metastases localized to adjacent peritoneum (within two regions of PCI); P2, metastases to distant peritoneum, number ≤10 and size ≤3 cm; P3, metastases to distant peritoneum, number ≥11 or size >3 cm; P3a, metastases to distant peritoneum, number ≥11 and size ≤3 cm, or number ≤10 and size >3 cm; P3b, metastases to distant peritoneum, number ≥11 and size >3 cm. Conclusion: This objective classification could improve the ability to discriminate prognosis in patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aim To investigate the usefulness of resection for synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer. Methods The patients who underwent surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer at 16 hospitals between 1991 and 2007 were enrolled in this study. The overall survival rates of patients with synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer with and without R0 resection were compared using a propensity score‐matched analysis. Results Among the 3965 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer, 1169 had synchronous peritoneal metastasis (28.5%). No patients received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in this study. Among the 1169 patients, 783 had enough clinicopathologic information and went through further analysis. Out of 783 patients, 204 underwent R0 resection. A multivariate analysis revealed that severity of peritoneal metastasis according to the Japanese classification (P

Aim: To investigate the usefulness of resection for synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer. Methods: The patients who underwent surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer at 16 hospitals between 1991 and 2007 were enrolled in this study. The overall survival rates of patients with synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer with and without R0 resection were compared using a propensity score‐matched analysis. Results: Among the 3965 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer, 1169 had synchronous peritoneal metastasis (28.5%). No patients received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in this study. Among the 1169 patients, 783 had enough clinicopathologic information and went through further analysis. Out of 783 patients, 204 underwent R0 resection. A multivariate analysis revealed that severity of peritoneal metastasis according to the Japanese classification (P <.0001) and distant metastases (P <.0001) were independently associated with non‐R0 resection. In a propensity score‐matched analysis, 118 patients who underwent R0 resection were matched with 118 patients who did not undergo R0 resection. There was no significant difference in each parameter between patients with and without R0 resection. After matching, the overall survival in patients with R0 resection was better than that without R0 resection (median survival time: 28.8 months and 15.6 months, P <.0001). Conclusion: The overall survival of patients with R0 resection for synchronous peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer was better than that without R0 resection even without HIPEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]