Search

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma for which standard treatment has yet to be established. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a suitable consolidation strategy for patients who respond to induction chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome and toxicity profile of the combination of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCyE) with that of the combination of thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide (TBC) as conditioning regimens of upfront ASCT for consolidation therapy in PCNSL. The PCNSL registry data set, prospectively collected from March 1993 to May 2017 at Asan Medical Center, was reviewed retrospectively. Patients with objective response to induction chemotherapy who received BuCyE or TBC as conditioning regimen for ASCT were included in the analysis. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Among 241 patients with a diagnosis of PCNSL, 53 received ASCT as upfront consolidation therapy with TBC (28 patients) or BuCyE (25 patients) as conditioning regimen. No median OS or PFS was reached in the TBC group, while the BuCyE group reached a median OS of 4.9 years (p = 0.02) and median PFS of 1.1 years (p = 0.007). The incidence of oral mucositis, nausea, and vomiting was higher with TBC than BuCyE. The median admission duration and days to engraftment were similar between the two groups. Despite the greater incidence of adverse events, TBC showed better outcomes than BuCyE in terms of survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although a few studies have evaluated the utility of F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in treatment-naive T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (T-NHLs), a few studies had been conducted to evaluate the role of FDG-PET in patients after treatment. A total of 41 patients with T-NHLs were included who underwent post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) PET for response assessment in addition to contrast-enhanced CT. The impact of post-ASCT PET on response assessment and predicting prognosis was retrospectively evaluated. Of the 41 patients, 11 (26.8 %) patients showed discordant response between two image modalities (Cohen's κ = 0.465). The additional PET study actually guides changing the post-ASCT response in six (54.5 %) of these 11 patients. Moreover, positive post-ASCT PET was associated with worse prognosis in event-free survival and overall survival than negative post-ASCT PET ( P = 0.003 and P = 0.044, respectively). Excluding four patients in whom further confirmation was not available due to early mortality, in 22 lesions showing discrepancy between two image modalities, 12 lesions were true positive ( N = 4) or true negative ( N = 8) for PET and ten lesions were false positive ( N = 7) or false negative ( N = 3). The accuracy for the discrepant lesions was 54.5 % (12 of 22), the overall accuracy for the detected lesions was 76.7 % (33 of 43), and the overall accuracy for patients was 89.2 % (33 of 37). Post-ASCT PET was useful in response assessment after ASCT, and the positive post-ASCT PET result was associated with worse prognosis than the negative post-ASCT PET in patients with T-NHLs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]