1. Adjuvant everolimus in high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final results from the PILLAR-2 randomized phase III trial
- Author
-
Kensei Tobinai, Jenna Fan, Anna Vanazzi, David Belada, Anne-Laure Louveau, Michinori Ogura, T. E. Witzig, Franco Cavalli, Jean-François Larouche, Kamal Bouabdallah, C. D. Bermudez Silva, Cassandra Wu, Jiří Mayer, Luis Fayad, Jun Zhu, Masayuki Hino, Muhit Ozcan, Tadashi Ikeda, Won Seog Kim, Yuankai Shi, John Kuruvilla, Luigi Rigacci, Luciano J. Costa, Maurizio Voi, and Joseph Kattan
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Neutropenia ,Placebo ,Gastroenterology ,Disease-Free Survival ,Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological ,0302 clinical medicine ,International Prognostic Index ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,medicine ,Adjuvant therapy ,Humans ,Everolimus ,Cyclophosphamide ,Aged ,Etoposide ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Hematology ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Oncology ,Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ,Doxorubicin ,Vincristine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Prednisone ,Female ,Rituximab ,Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse ,Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ,business ,Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ,030215 immunology ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥3 are at higher risk for relapse after a complete response (CR) to first-line rituximab-based chemotherapy (R-chemo). Everolimus has single-agent activity in lymphoma. PILLAR-2 aimed to improve disease-free survival (DFS) with 1 year of adjuvant everolimus. Patients and methods Patients with high-risk (IPI ≥3) DLBCL and a positron emission tomography/computed tomography-confirmed CR to first-line R-chemo were randomized to 1 year of everolimus 10 mg/day or placebo. The primary end point was DFS; secondary end points were overall survival, lymphoma-specific survival, and safety. Results Between August 2009 and December 2013, 742 patients were randomized to everolimus (n = 372) or placebo (n = 370). Median follow-up was 50.4 months (range 24.0–76.9). Overall, 47% of patients were ≥65 years, 50% were male, and 42% had an IPI of 4 or 5. 48% and 67% completed everolimus and placebo, respectively. Primary reasons for everolimus discontinuation versus placebo were adverse events (AEs; 30% versus 12%) and relapsed disease (6% versus 13%). Everolimus did not significantly improve DFS compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.92; 95% CI 0.69–1.22; P = 0.276). Two-year DFS rate was 77.8% (95% CI 72.7–82.1) with everolimus and 77.0% (95% CI 72.1–81.1) with placebo. Common grade 3/4 AEs with everolimus were neutropenia, stomatitis, and decreased CD4 lymphocytes. Conclusions Adjuvant everolimus did not improve DFS in patients already in PET/CT-confirmed CR. Future approaches should incorporate targeted agents such as everolimus with R-CHOP rather than as adjuvant therapy after CR has been obtained. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00790036
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF