Search

Background: The expression of programmed death (PD) ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been correlated with response and survival benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy of several agents appears correlated with PD-L1 expression. It remains controversial whether PD-L1 is prognostic in NSCLC. We assessed the prognostic value of PD-L1 IHC and its predictive role for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Tumor sections from three pivotal adjuvant chemotherapy trials (IALT, JBR.10, CALGB 9633) using the E1L3N antibody were studied in this pooled analysis. PD-L1 staining intensity and percentage in both tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) were scored by two pathologists. The average or consensus PD-L1 expression levels across intensities and/or percent cells stained were correlated with clinicopathological and molecular features, patient survivals and potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy., Results: Results from 982 patients were available for analysis. Considering staining at any intensities for overall PD-L1 expression, 314 (32.0%), 204 (20.8%) and 141 (14.3%) tumor samples were positive for PD-L1 staining on TCs using cut-offs at ≥1%, ≥10% and ≥25%, respectively. For PD-L1 expressing ICs, 380 (38.7%), 308 (31.4%) and 148 (15.1%) were positive at ≥ 1%, ≥10% and 25% cut-offs, respectively. Positive PD-L1 was correlated with squamous histology, intense lymphocytic infiltrate, and KRAS but not with TP53 mutation. EGFR mutated tumors showed statistically non-significant lower PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was neither prognostic with these cut-offs nor other exploratory cut-offs, nor were predictive for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy., Conclusions: PD-L1 IHC is not a prognostic factor in early stage NSCLC patients. It is also not predictive for adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in these patients., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy has become the standard therapy against resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of variable results on its late effect, we reanalyze the long-term data of the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial (IALT) to describe in details the role of adjuvant chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: In the IALT, 1867 patients were randomized between adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and control, who were followed up for a median of 7.5 years. Of these, 1687 patients were enrolled from 132 centers accepting to report the times to cancer events. We used event history methodology to estimate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on the risks of local relapse, distant metastasis, and death., Results: Adjuvant chemotherapy was highly effective against local relapses [HR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.90; P = 0.003] and nonbrain metastases (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94; P = 0.008) but not against brain metastases (HR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.82-1.4; P = 0.61). The effect on noncancer mortality was nonsignificant during the first 5 years (HR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.81-1.5; P = 0.29), whereas the risk of noncancer mortality was subsequently higher with treatment (HR = 3.6; 95% CI 2.2-5.9; P < 0.001). This harmful effect, however, potentially concerned only about 2% of the patients at 8 years., Conclusion: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the risk of local relapse and of nonbrain metastasis, thereby improving survival. This treatment exerted no residual effect on mortality during the first 5 years, but a higher risk of noncancer mortality was found thereafter. Detailed long-term follow-up is strongly recommended for all patients in randomized trials evaluating adjuvant treatments in NSCLC., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Most non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy though clinical response is restricted to a subset of patients. DNA repair protein levels are possible surrogates for cisplatin-induced DNA adduct (and subsequent cell death) repair efficiency and thus molecular determinants of therapeutic efficacy. The International Adjuvant Lung Trial (IALT)-Bio study previously suggested ERCC1 and MSH2 as predictive of cisplatin-based therapeutic benefit., Patients and Methods: DNA repair protein expression (XPF, BRCA1, ERCC1, MSH2, p53, PARP1, and ATM) was assessed by immunohistochemistry on a large subset of patients (N = 769) from the IALT trial. Tissue Microarray slides were digitally scanned and signal quantified by user-defined macros. Statistical analyses (univariate and multivariate) of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival used binary cut-offs (H score low/high expression)., Results: In patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), ATM, p53, PARP1, ERCC1, and MSH2 displayed significant (borderline) predictive values, mainly on DFS with chemotherapy efficacy limited to low marker levels. Adenocarcinoma (ADC) results were not significant. BRCA1 and XPF were not significant for predictive modeling in either SCC or ADCs., Conclusion: Here predictive utility of DNA repair enzymes co-segregates with SCC histology, focusing their predictive value to this histological subclass of NSCLC. Distinct mechanisms of chemotherapeutic response or resistance might exist among histological subclasses of solid tumors.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of malignancy-related mortality in the Western world. Despite advances in early detection and standard treatment, NSCLC is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage and therefore patients have a poor prognosis. However, its heterogeneity provides ample opportunity for multiple treatment approaches and target pathways. Considerable progress has been made in identifying novel targets, leading to a growing number of treatment options. Overall survival (OS) may not always be the most appropriate primary end point for assessment of efficacy, as it is likely that patients with NSCLC will receive multiple lines of therapy during their treatment. Additionally, crossover appears as an ethical necessity to many investigators if molecular targeted agents display outstanding early efficacy. While improving OS remains the goal for clinicians, progression-free survival (PFS) is increasingly being utilised as an alternative end point. In this article, we will evaluate the value of PFS as a primary measure of efficacy for advanced NSCLC, compare the clinical situation with that in other solid malignancies and review the growing number of treatment options for NSCLC.

Following the 1995 meta-analysis on the role of postoperative chemotherapy in NSCLC, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the effect of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adding substantially to the existing evidence. The LACE pooled analysis included a total of 4584 patients accrued in five recent cisplatin-based adjuvant trials. It confirmed the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.0043). In addition, it showed that adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is detrimental in stage IA resected NSCLC; it also indicated that the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin offered a higher benefit compared with older doublets or triplets. The individual-databased meta-analysis was also updated with a total of >10,000 patients. It confirmed the significant effect of postoperative chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, with an overall significant benefit of 4% at 5 years. The recent results of biological programmes indicate that the expression of some tumour markers including ERCC1 be evaluated in order to determine which patients are more likely to benefit from chemotherapy. If these results are confirmed, tailored therapy might be the next progress for resected NSCLC.

Background: The increasing use of biomarkers as molecular determinants of responsiveness to conventional chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy has raised the question of the reliability and reproducibility of their evaluation in bronchial biopsies as compared with corresponding resected surgical specimens., Patients and Methods: Immunohistochemical expression of five markers related to signal transduction [epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), phospho-Akt], cell proliferation (Ki-67), DNA repair [excision repair cross-complementing (ERCC)1] and cellular 'immortality' [human telomerase catalytic component (hTERT)], was assessed in 41 patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer in both bronchial biopsies and whole surgical specimens., Results: High correlation coefficients were observed between the expression of ERCC1, hTERT and Ki-67 in the biopsies and the surgical specimens [0.83 (P < 0.0001); 0.55 (P < 0.001) and 0.64 (P < 0.0001), respectively]. On the other hand, biomarker expression in biopsy was less correlated with the expression in the whole tissue sample for the markers of signal response and transduction [0.24 (P = 0.17) and 0.29 (P = 0.09) for EGFR and phospho-Akt, respectively]., Conclusions: Our results indicate a lack of association in the expression of important biomarkers between lung biopsies and corresponding resected tumors, with discordance rates ranging between 9% and 41%. Although these results need to be further validated in larger cohorts, they indicate that the evaluation of the expression of biomarkers in bronchial biopsies can be misleading.

Pemetrexed is a new multitargeted antifolate that can be easily administered as a 10-min infusion every 3 weeks. The use of folic acid, vitamin B(12), and corticoid prophylaxis has significantly reduced pemetrexed-induced toxicity. Single-agent pemetrexed has shown antitumor activity in a wide range of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Association with vinorelbine, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin have been tried, but the pemetrexed and gemcitabine combination, an easy to administer cisplatin-free doublet, has been documented in many phase 2 trials in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. In vitro cytotoxic assays and phase I studies have defined several schedules of administration for pemetrexed and gemcitabine. The recommended dose is pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 or 8, and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8, but it is unknown if pemetrexed should precede or follow gemcitabine and at what time interval. Published studies have failed to show significant differences in overall survival times despites response rates oscillating between 15% and 41%. The main toxicities are neutropenia, fatigue, skin rashes and elevated transaminases and seem to occur with similar rates in the many phase 2 trials. Hopes for the future are in tailored chemotherapy, since molecular markers of sensitivity are available for gemcitabine and pemetrexed, allowing to determinate in the future which patients will be most likely to benefit from the gemcitabine-pemetrexed doublet.

Background: Despite several randomised trials comparing radiotherapy alone with concomitant radio-chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is not clear whether the addition of chemotherapy improves survival., Patients and Methods: This meta-analysis was based on individual patient data from published and unpublished randomised trials which compared radiotherapy alone with the same radiotherapy combined with concomitant cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Trials with accrual completed after 2000 were excluded. Trials were sought in electronic databases, clinical trial registries and by additional manual searches. The primary endpoint was overall survival analysed using the log-rank test stratified by trials., Results: There were twelve eligible trials that included a total of 1921 patients. The data from 3 trials were not available. Therefore, the analysis was based on 9 trials including 1764 patients. Median follow-up was 7.2 years. The hazard ratio of death among patients treated with radio-chemotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02) corresponding to an absolute benefit of chemotherapy of 4% at 2 years. There was some evidence of heterogeneity among trials and sensitivity analyses did not lead to consistent results. The combination of platin with etoposide seemed more effective than platin alone., Conclusions: Concomitant platin-based radio-chemotherapy may improve survival of patients with locally advanced NSCLC. However, the available data are insufficient to accurately define the size of such a potential treatment benefit and the optimal schedule of chemotherapy.

Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer arising in never-smokers is usually of adenocarcinoma subtype. The oncogenic pathway of such tumors is poorly understood. To better define the biological characteristics of these tumors, we have compared the expression of a panel of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related biomarkers in lung adenocarcinomas from smokers versus those in never-smokers., Patients and Methods: Using immunohistochemical analysis, we retrospectively analyzed EGFR, pAKT, PTEN, Ki-67, p27 and hTERT expression in specimens from 190 patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinomas (43 never-smokers and 147 smokers). These analyses were performed on tissue microarrays., Results: EGFR expression was higher in tumors from smokers (P < 0.01), while pAKT was overexpressed mainly in tumors from never-smokers (P = 0.01). As expected, the tumors from smokers presented a higher expression of Ki-67 and a more frequent loss of expression of p27 (P < 0.01). In a multivariate model, two biological factors (p27 and Ki-67) and two clinical factors (age and sex) showed independent significant correlation with never-smoking status., Conclusions: Lung adenocarcinomas in never-smokers have a very distinct immunohistochemical expression profile of EGFR-related biomarkers as compared with lung adenocarcinomas in smokers. High levels of EGFR and Ki-67 are observed in smokers, while never-smokers are characterized by high levels of pAKT and p27.

Background: The expression of CXCR4 has been implicated in metastatic dissemination in different models of breast cancer and melanoma. In the present study, we evaluated CXCR4 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the relationship between CXCR4 expression and the prognosis of stage I disease., Patients and Methods: Using immunohistochemical analysis, we retrospectively analyzed CXCR4 expression in specimens from 61 patients with completely resected pathologically confirmed stage I NSCLC for whom clinical follow-up data were available., Results: In the present study, we have shown that: CXCR4 is expressed by tumor cells in stage I NSCLC; CXCR4 is located in the nucleus and/or in the cytoplasm of tumor cells; strong nuclear staining was observed in 17 cases (29.8%); patients whose tumors had CXCR4-positive nuclear staining had a significantly longer duration of survival than patients whose tumors had no nuclear expression (P = 0.039, log-rank test). Interestingly, the 5-year metastasis rates were 23.5% and 34.1% in patients with CXCR4-positive and CXCR4-negative nuclear expression, respectively (P = 0.2)., Conclusion: Strong CXCR4-positive nuclear staining was associated with a significantly better outcome in early-stage NSCLC. The mechanisms underlying this clinically and biologically important finding need to be further explored.

Background: Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is currently recommended as the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its benefit seems limited to fit patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. For PS2 patients, there is no consensus on standard treatment. With the aims of reviewing the evidence supporting each of these therapeutic options, possibly reaching a consensus for treatment of PS2 patients affected by advanced NSCLC in clinical practice, and suggesting the priorities for clinical research in this field, an European Experts Panel took place in Avellino, Italy in April 2003., Results: and conclusions On the basis of current evidence, chemotherapy treatment appears justified for patients with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Single-agent chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxanes) could be the preferred option, although carboplatin-based or low-dose cisplatin-based doublets may represent alternative options. Stronger evidence is expected from new clinical research specifically focused on PS2 patients. Single-agent chemotherapy should be the standard arm against which experimental treatments are tested in randomised trials dedicated to PS2 patients. High priority should be given to the evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of platinum-based combinations, and to the testing of new biological agents. Another research priority is the improvement of supportive care. Patients strongly need symptomatic improvement: end points such as symptom relief, clinical benefit and quality of life should have a central position in trials dedicated to PS2 NSCLC patients.

Background: PKC412 (N-benzoyl-staurosporine), an oral inhibitor of protein kinase C, is capable of cell cycle inhibition and is endowed with anti-angiogenic properties. This dose-finding phase I study was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PKC412 when combined with cisplatin-gemcitabine., Patients and Methods: Escalating doses of PKC412 were given every day of a 4 week cycle with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Dose escalation was based on a modified continuous reassessment method., Results: Twenty-three patients, assigned to four cohorts receiving PKC412 at a dose ranging from 25 to 150 mg/day were evaluable. Grade 3 diarrhea occurring in 3/4 patients at cycle 1 led us to define 150 mg/day as the MTD. The MTD based on multiple cycles was redefined as 100 mg/day, since prolonged grade 2-3 nausea/vomiting leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 3/7 patients after repeated cycles. The next lower dose tested of 50 mg/day was therefore considered as the recommended dose for phase II trials. Among 33 cycles in eight patients, toxicity consisted of grade 1-2 diarrhea (12.5%) and asthenia (50%) with only one patient experiencing grade 3 headache at this dose level. A partial response was observed in three patients., Conclusions: The results of the present study indicate that PKC412 at a dose of 50 mg/day can be safely added to cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: We studied the effect of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with resected early breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen., Patients and Methods: The trial included 835 patients with either axillary lymph node involvement, or tumors with histological grade II or III. They were randomized after local surgery to receive either tamoxifen (TAM group) or tamoxifen plus chemotherapy (TAM-CT group) consisting of six courses of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC), or 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC). Radiotherapy was given after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy in the TAM-CT group and after surgery in the TAM group., Results: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 73% in the TAM group and 79% in the TAM-CT group (log-rank test, P = 0.06). The 5-year overall survival rates were 82% and 87%, respectively (P = 0.06). The 5-year distant metastasis rates were 22% and 16% (P = 0.02), and the 5-year local recurrence rates were 6% and 4%, respectively (P = 0.23). There were no significant differences for contralateral breast cancer or other new primary malignancies. Chemotherapy tended to be more effective for patients who had tumors without estrogen receptors (trend test, P = 0.05)., Conclusions: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy administered to postmenopausal patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen gave a borderline significant benefit on overall and DFS, mainly by a reduction in distant metastases. Delaying radiotherapy after six courses of chemotherapy did not affect local control after up to 10 years of follow-up.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the toxicity profile, the recommended dose (RD) and the pharmacokinetic parameters, and to evaluate the antitumor activity of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ovarian carcinoma (OC)., Methods: Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-min infusion followed by a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin, repeated every 2 weeks. Doses of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin ranged from 800 to 1500 and 70 to 100 mg/m(2), respectively., Results: Forty-four patients (26 males, 18 females; median age 55 years) including 35 NSCLC (five platinum pretreated) and nine OC patients (all platinum pretreated) received a total of 355 cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity at any dose level occurred during the first two cycles; therefore, the highest dose-level of gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) was considered as the RD. Hematological toxicity was moderate amongst the 22 patients treated (167 cycles) at that dose level. Thirteen cycles were associated with grade 3-4 non-febrile neutropenia in six patients, and eight cycles with grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in two patients. Other toxicities were mild to moderate, consisting of asthenia and peripheral neurotoxicity. Four of the 35 patients treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity requiring treatment discontinuation at cycle 10. In the range of the doses used, gemcitabine and its main metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine appeared not to be affected by oxaliplatin 70-100 mg/m(2). Of the 44 patients evaluable for activity, 12 NSCLC patients experienced objective responses (one complete and 11 partial responses) and three OC patients showed tumor stabilization lasting for 6 months with a 50% decrease of CA 125 level. Two partial responses (NSCLC) and one tumor stabilization (OC) occurred in platinum-resistant patients., Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin could be safely administered on an out-patient schedule in patients with advanced NSCLC and OC. The RD was gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. Promising antitumor activity was reported in patients with NSCLC and platinum-pretreated OC, and thus, deserves further evaluation.

Background: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has a beneficial effect on overall survival in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in complete remission as shown in a worldwide meta-analysis. The current analysis aimed to evaluate PCI effects on patterns of failure in this patient category., Patients and Methods: The Institut Gustave-Roussy coordinated two parallel randomized studies including a total of 511 patients with SCLC. Patients were randomly assigned to either PCI (24 Gy in eight fractions and 12 days) or no PCI. Patterns of failure were analyzed according to (i) total event rates and (ii) isolated first site of relapse using a competing risk approach., Results: Five hundred and five patients were analyzed. The 5-year cumulative rate of brain metastasis as an isolated first site of relapse was 37% in the control group and 20% in the PCI group (P < 0.001). The overall 5-year rates of brain metastasis were 59% and 43%, respectively [relative risk (RR) 0.50; P < 0.001]. The 5-year overall survival rates were 15% in the control group and 18% in the PCI group (RR 0.84; P = 0.06)., Conclusions: PCI decreased significantly the risk of brain metastasis. Other events were not influenced. The relative death risk reduction was of borderline significance. Results reported as isolated first cause of failure and subsequent competing events may explain why a major treatment effect on brain metastases rate has a rather moderate effect on survival.

Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in improving survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The objective of this study was to identify patients more likely to benefit from chemotherapy in order to avoid the indiscriminate treatment of all patients., Patients and Methods: A multivariate analysis of survival was performed using the database of the European randomized phase III trial that compared vinorelbine (navelbine) (NVB), vinorelbine-cisplatin (NVB-P) and vindesine-cisplatin (VDS-P) in 612 patients with inoperable NSCLC (stage III or IV). Interactions between treatment and the prognostic factors singled out by the Cox procedure were specifically tested., Results: The performance status (PS) was the only significant interaction among the selected prognostic factors and treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that the advantage obtained with NVB-P predominantly concerned PS 0-1 patients, whose median survival lasted 43 weeks (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 39-50 weeks) with a one-year survival rate of 38% (95% CI: 31%-46%) versus 36 weeks (95%, CI: 30-40 weeks) and 34% (95% CI: 27%-42%) for NVB alone, and 33 weeks (95% CI: 30-39 weeks) and 29% (95% CI: 22%-36%) for VDS-P. In sharp contrast, survival in PS 2 patients was similar (median 18 weeks) (NVB-P 95% CI: 11-34 weeks; NVB 95% CI: 11-35 weeks; VDS-P 95% CI: 14-32 weeks) whatever the treatment., Conclusion: PS 2 patients with advanced NSCLC might not benefit from cisplatin combination therapy.

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a chemotherapy strategy based on histological differentiation, for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site., Patients and Methods: Forty-eight patients were prospectively included in the trial. Thirty patients with poorly-differentiated carcinoma or poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma (group A) received a combination of cisplatin and etoposide. Patients with a responsive or stable disease after two cycles received the same regimen plus bleomycin, ifosfamide and G-CSF. Eighteen patients with well- or moderately-differentiated carcinoma (group B) received cisplatin, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and alpha-interferon. Treatment was maintained in case of response or stable disease for up to six cycles., Results: The overall response rate (RR) for the entire group is 43% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9%-50.1%): seven CR and five PR in group A (RR = 40%) and six CR and two PR in group B (RR = 44%). Grade 4 leucopenia was observed in 22 (46%) patients and sepsis in 3 (6%). Median survival is 9.4 months (range 5-13.7 months) and 16.1 months (range 11.8 20.3 months), respectively., Conclusions: This chemotherapy strategy is one way to achieve high response rates, particularly for patients with well- or moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma usually considered poorly chemosensitive.

Purpose: Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are active drugs with broad spectrum of activity and manageable toxicity in clinical trials. The aims of this study were to describe the toxicity, to determine the dose-limiting toxicity, and to define the doses of gemcitabine and vinorelbine to be recommended for phase II studies in patients with advanced cancers., Patients and Methods: Drugs were given as 30-min infusions on day 1 and 8 (vinorelbine before gemcitabine) every 3 weeks. Thirty-six patients (male:female ratio 25:11; mean age 54, PS > 60) were treated including 1 retroperitoneal sarcoma, 7 head and neck, 10 lung, 4 thyroid, 6 pancreatic, 1 bladder, 2 ovary, 2 gastric, 1 rectum, 1 unknown primary, and 1 renal cell carcinoma. Doses of gemcitabine/vinorelbine ranged from 800/20 mg/m2 to 1500/30 mg/m2., Results: The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. A transient grade 2-3 elevation of transaminases was frequently observed at several dose-levels, although this toxicity did not appear to be dose dependant and was reversible at day 21 before the next cycle. Other toxicities were mild and easily manageable, consisting of fatigue and flu-like syndromes. Since the MTD was not reach at the higher dose-level, the recommended dose level of the gemcitabine-vinorelbine combination was 1500/30 mg/m2. One toxic death due to hematologic toxicity was reported in a heavily pretreated patient who underwent prior chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy. A total of 12 patients were treated at the recommended dose level which was associated with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 3 of 12 patients and in 22.9% of cycles., Conclusions: This study estimates that the recommended dose for phase II studies of gemcitabine-vinorelbine is 1500/30 mg/m2 at day 1 and 8 every three weeks. A careful monitoring of the hematologic toxicity is recommended in heavily pretreated patients and in patients who received pelvic radiotherapy. Partial responses observed in a patient with an advanced cisplatin-5-fluorouracil-resistant pancreatic adenocarcinoma and in a patient with mesothelioma support further evaluation of this combination in patients with tumors refractory to classical antitumor agents.

Ewing's sarcoma of the pelvic bones was diagnosed in a 21-year childbearing woman, raising major medical and ethical problems. The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches during the sixth month of gestation were tailored in order to cure the patient and avoid unnecessary toxicity to the fetus. Ancillary tests included ultrasound and MRI studies of the pelvis. Ifosfamide and adriamycin, premedicated by granisetron, were administered during gestation, and were found to be safe. Cesarean section was the preferred way of delivery since the tumor involved the pelvic bones. The outcome was a disease-free patient and a small healthy baby who is now two years of age.

Currently, lung cancer is a leading cause of death in men with more than half million new cases diagnosed every year. Eighty percent of these tumors are non-small-cell carcinoma and 70% of these are unresectable or metastatic at the time of presentation, resulting in dramatically poor survival rates. The increasing number of drugs showing a significant activity against non-small-cell lung cancer and the widespread use of modern cisplatin based regimens offer some hope of progress and suggest that chemotherapy may have a role in treating this disease. A recent meta-analysis has confirmed the modest but significant survival benefit for patients treated with combined chemotherapy both in case of metastatic disease and in addition to radiotherapy, in locally advanced disease.

Treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains disappointing despite initially high complete response rates. The dramatic initial chemosensitivity of tumor cells is rapidly thwarted by the early emergence of chemoresistant clonogenic cells, regardless of front line treatments. Although a dose-response relationship is well established its effect on survival is inconclusive. From 1980 to 1988, 202 patients with limited SCLC were included in four consecutive trials using an alternating schedule of thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite an increase in chemotherapy and/or the total radiation dose, no significant difference was observed between the four trials in terms of response, disease-free or overall survival. However, a retrospective analysis performed on a total of 131 consecutive patients led us to postulate that a moderate increase in the initial dose, i.e. first course, of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide, could improve overall survival. From 1988 to 1991, 105 consecutive patients were included in a large randomized trial to address this question. The difference in treatment options only concerned the initial doses of cisplatin (80 vs. 100 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (900 vs. 1200 mg/m2). According to the triangular test used in this study the trial was closed after inclusion of 105 patients, 32 months after the start of the study because, at that time, overall survival was significantly better in the higher-dose group (p = 0.001). This debatable concept of dose-intensity having an impact on survival offers new possibilities for the management of SCLC. The contribution of hematopoietic support may help to validate this concept.

Two chemotherapy regimens for patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer were prospectively compared in a randomized multicentric trial with crossover. Every four weeks, 60 consecutive previously untreated patients received either DPE (doxorubicin, cisplatin and etoposide), or CIV (carboplatin, ifosfamide and vincristine) with crossover as soon as progression or end of response were observed. Pretreatment characteristics were similar in the two groups. Fifty-seven patients were evaluated for response. The response rate was higher with the DPE regimen both in first-line (for DPE: response rate 62% (18/29), including 17% (5/29) of complete response (CR), and for CIV: response rate 29% (8/28) with no CR, p < 0.02) and in second-line after crossover (for DPE: response rate 45% (9/20) including 5% (1/20) of CR, and for CIV response rate 0%, p < 0.02). Major toxicities were equally frequent in both groups. No significant difference was found between median survival times (9.7 months for the DPE group and 10.4 months for the CIV group). We conclude that: 1) DPE is a more active regimen than CIV, both in first- and second-line; 2) no alternating scheme may be considered with these two combinations. Of particular note is the similar median survival times in the two groups, contrasting with the different activities of the two regimens.