Search

Background: The cardiac safety of trastuzumab concurrent with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in an adjuvant breast cancer treatment regimen is unknown., Patients and Methods: Women with resected node-positive or intermediate-risk node-negative HER2 overexpressing breast cancer and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≥55% were randomized (1:2) to doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 (A)+cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (C) every 21 days (q21d) for four cycles or PLD 35 mg/m2+C q21d+trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly (H) for 12 weeks. Both groups then received paclitaxel (Taxol, T) 80 mg/m2 with H for 12 weeks followed by H to complete 1 year. The primary end point was cardiac event rate or inability to administer 1 year of trastuzumab., Results: Of 181 randomized patients, 179 underwent cardiac analysis. The incidence of cardiac toxicity or inability to administer trastuzumab due to cardiotoxicity was 18.6% [n=11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7% to 30.9%] with A+C→T+H and 4.2% (n=5; 95% CI 1.4% to 9.5%) with PLD+C+H→T+H (P=0.0036). All events, except one, were asymptomatic systolic dysfunction or mildly symptomatic heart failure. Mean absolute LVEF reduction at cycle 8 was greater with doxorubicin (5.6% versus 2.1%; P=0.0014)., Conclusion: PLD+C+H→T+H is feasible and results in lower early cardiotoxicity rates compared with A+C→T+H.

Background: The European Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (EU-ARCCS) expanded-access study provided sorafenib to advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients in whom previous systemic therapy had failed. The study assessed the safety and use of sorafenib for the treatment of advanced RCC in a large community-based patient population across 11 countries in Europe., Patients and Methods: EU-ARCCS was a single-arm, open-label trial of sorafenib in advanced RCC patients. End points included safety, time to progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR). Subgroup analyses included age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histology, prior therapy, and number and sites of metastases., Results: About 1159 advanced RCC patients were enrolled. Most patients (94%) experienced drug-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade, with the most common grade ≥3 AEs including hand-foot skin reaction (13%), diarrhea (7%), fatigue (7%), hypertension (6%), and rash/desquamation (5%). The incidence of AEs in the subgroups was similar to that in the overall population. Median PFS was 6.6 months; DCR at ≥8 and ≥12 weeks was 85% and 78%, respectively., Conclusions: The sorafenib safety profile in European community-based practice settings was similar to that reported in clinical trials. The heterogeneous advanced RCC patient population in EU-ARCCS permitted assessment of sorafenib in important subpopulations of advanced RCC patients.

Background: We described changes in treatment of colon cancer over time and the impact on survival in The Netherlands in the period 1989-2006., Patients and Methods: All 103,744 patients with invasive colon cancer during 1989-2006 in The Netherlands were included. Data were extracted from The Netherlands Cancer Registry. Trends in treatment over time were analysed and multivariable relative survival analysis was carried out., Results: The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III patients <75 years increased from 19% in 1989-1993 to 79% in 2004-2006 and from 1% to 19% in stage III patients ≥75 years. Among stage IV patients, resection rates of the primary tumour decreased from 72% to 63%, while chemotherapy administration increased from 23% to 64% in those <75 years. Survival increased from 52% to 58% in males and from 55% to 58% among females. Stage III patients with adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a relative excess risk of 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.4-0.4) compared with those without. Among stage IV patients, resection of primary tumour, palliative chemotherapy, and metastasectomy were important prognostic factors., Conclusions: There were substantial improvements in management and survival of colon cancer from 1989 to 2006. Stage III disease patients with colon cancer experienced the largest improvement in survival, most likely related to the increased administration of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Background: Angiogenesis inhibition is a rational treatment strategy for high-grade glioma (HGG). Combined antiangiogenic therapy and chemotherapy could be beneficial, taking advantage of different mechanisms of antitumour activity of both therapies. We carried out a phase I-II clinical trial with the combination of bevacizumab and continuous dose-intense temozolomide (TMZ) for patients with a recurrent HGG after first- or second-line treatment., Patients and Methods: Twenty-three HGG patients were treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks) and TMZ (daily 50 mg/m(2)), until clinical or radiological progression. Conventional and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were carried out on days -4, 3 and 21 and until clinical or radiological progression., Results: Overall response rate (20%), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) (17.4%), median progression-free survival (13.9 weeks) and median overall survival (OS) (17.1 weeks) were considerably lower compared with most other studies with bevacizumab-containing regimens. The dynamic MRI parameters contrast transfer coefficient and relative cerebral blood volume decreased rapidly during the early phases of treatment, reflecting changes in vascularisation and vessel permeability but not in tumour activity. In addition, >50% of patients showed oedema reduction and a reduced shift on T1 images., Conclusion: Treatment with bevacizumab and TMZ is feasible and well tolerated but did not improve PFS6 and median OS.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine, to identify a recommended dose and to determine the response rate and time to disease progression. In addition, we aimed to explore the pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan and capecitabine when used in different sequences of administration, with irinotecan infusion either prior to or after the first intake of capecitabine., Patients and Methods: One hundred patients were included: 43 patients were recruited into an extended phase I trial of alternating escalation in dose of both drugs where irinotecan was administered intravenously (i.v) on day 1 after first intake of capecitabine taken from days 1-14 twice daily, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. After the determination of recommended dose a further 57 patients were treated in a phase II evaluation with the reverse sequence of drugs on day 1. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in patients treated at the recommended dose in two cohorts of patients in which the sequence of the first administration of each drug was reversed., Results: The MTD of the combination was determined as irinotecan 300 mg/m2, with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day. Dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhoea. The recommended dose is irinotecan intravenous (i.v.) 250 mg/m2 day 1 and capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14, every 3 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated, with diarrhoea the most common serious toxicity. Response rate in the phase II cohort was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29% to 56%]. Median duration of response was 7.7 months (95% CI 7.5-8.9). Median time to progression was 8.3 months (95% CI 5.8-10). No significant effect on irinotecan pharmacokinetics was observed whatever the intake of capecitabine before or after irinotecan infusion. An effect of irinotecan on capecitabine and some capecitabine metabolites was observed, but irinotecan did not effect 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pharmacokinetics., Conclusions: Irinotecan in combination with capecitabine is a well tolerated regimen with an activity comparable to, but more convenient than, irinotecan-5-FU i.v. combinations in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer. The pharmacokinetic data suggest that the sequence of administration does not impact significantly on the metabolism of the two drugs.

Background: Eniluracil is an effective inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the initial and rate limiting enzyme in the catabolism of fluorouracil. The current study was done to determine the objective tumour response of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer., Patients and Methods: This was a multicentre, phase II study in patients with anthracycline-refractory (AR) or anthracycline- and taxane-refractory (ATR) advanced breast cancer. Oral eniluracil (10 mg/m2) and fluorouracil (1 mg/m2) were taken twice daily for 28 days of each 35-day treatment course., Results: In this study, 106 patients received treatment: 62 patients in the AR stratum and 44 patients in the ATR stratum. The objective tumour response rate in the intent-to-treat population was 18% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 11%-27%), including three complete responses. The response rate was similar in both strata: 19% in the AR and 16% in the ATR stratum. The overall median duration of response was 23.6 weeks. The treatment was well tolerated with a low incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities that were considered attributable to study medication., Conclusion: Treatment with oral eniluracil-fluorouracil was well tolerated by patients with advanced breast cancer. The efficacy data were comparable with those of other published studies in this group of refractory patients.

Background: Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation is rapidly replacing autologous bone marrow transplantation as hematological support after high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma or solid tumors. Controversy exists concerning the number of progenitor cells required for rapid and sustained bone marrow recovery, and as to which of the widely available methods for estimating this number should be employed., Methods: Forty consecutive patients with solid tumors or lymphomas received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral stem cell reinfusion. All stem cell harvests had been performed after mobilization with standard-dose chemotherapy followed by 300 micrograms G-CSF daily. Hematopoietic reconstitution was studied in relation to pertinent patient characteristics, to the size of the graft (in terms of the total number of mononuclear cells (MNC), the number of granulocyte/macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) and the number of CD34+ cells, and to the use of G-CSF after stem cell reinfusion., Results: Both the numbers of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells reinfused, but not those of the MNC, correlated with granulocyte and platelet recovery. Patients who received at least 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight achieved platelet transfusion independence on day 12 after reinfusion (range: day 7-37), significantly earlier than patients who had received less (p = 0.001). Thirty patients who received G-CSF (300 micrograms s.c. daily) after reinfusion achieved granulocyte recovery (> or = 500 x 10(6)/l) on day 9 (range: day 8-12), while this took a median of 15 days (range: day 10-28) in 10 consecutive patients not receiving G-CSF (p = 0.0003). In one patient who had received 1.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, secondary bone marrow failure developed 3 months after transplantation. Reinfusion of cryopreserved autologous bone marrow was followed by prompt recovery., Conclusion: Peripheral stem cells, mobilized by moderate-dose chemotherapy and G-CSF, lead to rapid and durable engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy when at least 3-5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg are reinfused. Lower numbers may also be satisfactory, but are associated with slower granulocyte and platelet recoveries. A moderate dose of G-CSF after reinfusion significantly hastens granulocyte recovery without interfering with platelet recovery.

Background: The prognosis of patients with stage III B breast carcinoma with metastasis to the apical axillary lymph nodes is poor despite adequate local control achieved by surgery and/or radiation therapy. This study evaluated the feasibility of a dose-intensive up-front chemotherapy regimen in this subgroup of patients., Patients and Methods: A preoperative chemotherapy regimen consisting of 3 courses of fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, dose-intensive epidoxorubicin 120 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 (DIE-FEC), was administered at 21-day intervals without hematopoietic growth factors to 31 patients with apex-positive disease. All patients were below 60 years of age and none had had prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy., Results: Seven patients achieved clinical complete responses (23%), and 21 achieved clinical partial responses (68%); three patients had stable disease (10%), one of whom had only ductal carcinoma in situ at histopathologic evaluation, which suggested an additional response to therapy. The major toxicity was moderate bone marrow suppression with a median WBC nadir of 1650/microliters (range 500-4600). Other toxic effects were mild., Conclusion: DIE-FEC is well-tolerated and highly effective as up-front chemotherapy in relatively young patients with high-risk breast cancer, with a 90% (CI 74%-98%) clinical objective response rate.

Sixteen patients received a high-dose chemotherapy regimen consisting of carboplatin (1600 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m2) as daily two-hour infusions over four days (CC). All but two of them also received thiotepa (480 mg/m2) in eight 30-minute infusions given every 12 hours (CTC). Bone marrow and/or peripheral stem cell (PSC) reinfusions took place 72 hours after the last course of chemotherapy. The major toxicity was bone marrow suppression, the duration of which was markedly reduced in the patients receiving PSC reinfusions. Non-hematological toxicity was relatively mild and consisted of nausea and vomiting, minor mucositis and skin rashes. All but one patient had mild and completely reversible elevations of serum ALAT and/or LDH levels. One patient, who had received full-dose chemotherapy despite a creatinine clearance of 56 ml/min, developed significant toxicity consisting of transient cyclophosphamide-associated pancarditis, reversible neurotoxicity and partially reversible hearing loss and renal function impairment. There were no toxic deaths. In view of the high carboplatin dose, the CTC regimen may be particularly suitable for use in the salvage treatment of germ cell cancer. Since CTC causes no serious organ toxicity, further studies to determine its suitability for double or even triple transplantation programs are warranted.

Eleven patients with testicular cancer, either relapsing after or refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, underwent salvage chemotherapy with high-dose carboplatin (800 mg/m2 on day 1) and high-dose etoposide (500 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5). A total of 21 courses were administered. The major toxicity consisted of profound myelosuppression. There were two toxic deaths, both caused by infection during neutropenia. Bone marrow recovery was usually complete around day 26 (range 19-129). Other toxicities included mild mucositis, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. No significant neurotoxicity or hearing loss were observed and only one patient had a moderate decrease in renal function. Nine of ten evaluable patients responded, with one complete remission, 6 partial remissions with normalization of tumor markers, and two partial remissions with over one log decrease of tumor markers. The duration of these remissions was not evaluable, since only three evaluable and responding patients did not receive additional therapy after HD-CE. All three relapsed after discontinuing chemotherapy. HD-CE has activity in relapsing or refractory testicular cancer and can be administered without bone marrow support. The regimen may thus be suitable to be used as a remission induction regimen prior to consolidation with intensive chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation.