Search

Objectives: Patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea can experience significant sinonasal symptom burden, leading to poor quality of life (QOL). The objective of this study was to investigate sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) scores in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery for spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and compare them to patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP)., Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and CRSsNP was performed. Pre-surgery and post-surgery SNOT-22 scores and domains were compared within each group. Improvements in SNOT-22 scores after surgery were compared between the groups., Results: Ninety-one patients were in the CSF rhinorrhea group and 105 patients were in the CRSsNP group. Within each group, surgery significantly improved total SNOT-22 scores, domain scores, and most of the individual symptoms. Comparing the 2 groups revealed similar improvements in total SNOT-22 scores ( P  = .244). The CSF rhinorrhea group improved more in runny nose ( P  < .001), postnasal discharge ( P  < .001), wake up at night ( P  = .024), and embarrassed ( P  = .002). The CRSsNP group improved more in sneezing ( P  = .027), nasal blockage ( P  < .001), decreased sense of smell/taste ( P  = .011), thick nasal discharge ( P  < .001), facial pain/pressure ( P  = .008), and the ear/facial domain ( P  = .010)., Conclusions: Patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea experience significant symptom burden. Those who undergo CSF leak repair should experience significant improvement in QOL similar to patients who undergo ESS for CRSsNP as measured by SNOT-22.

Objectives: Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea is a diagnostic challenge due to its overlapping symptomatology with other sinonasal diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate whether items on the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 could suggest a diagnosis of spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea versus chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP)., Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review of patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and a control group of CRSsNP patients was performed. Individual SNOT-22 scores and domain scores were compared., Results: One hundred fifteen patients were included in both cohorts. Of the patients in the CSF rhinorrhea group, 48% were misdiagnosed as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) prior to the correct identification of a CSF leak. On bivariate analysis, the CSF rhinorrhea group scored significantly higher on the SNOT-22 for runny nose ( P  < .001) and was more likely to designate this symptom as most important ( P  < .001). The CRSsNP group scored significantly higher in nasal blockage ( P  < .001), thick nasal discharge ( P  < .001), facial pain/pressure ( P  < .001), and in the ear/facial ( P  < .001) and rhinologic ( P  = .003) domains. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that runny nose ( P  < .001) was most predictive of spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea while nasal blockage ( P  < .001), thick nasal discharge ( P  < .001), and facial pain/pressure ( P  = .001) were predictive of CRSsNP after adjusting for relevant confounders. No significant difference was observed in total SNOT-22 scores between groups ( P  = .676)., Conclusions: Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea is commonly misdiagnosed as other sinonasal pathologies. However, individual SNOT-22 items can help aid in suggesting a CSF leak. Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea should be suspected in patients who have high SNOT-22 scores for runny nose and report this symptom as most important, but have lower scores related to the other cardinal symptoms of CRS.

Background: Reliable use of surgical navigation depends upon the registration process. The gold standard is paired-point registration with bone-anchored fiducials, but contour-map registration is more practical. Surgeons may employ variable contour maps and less experienced team members often perform this critical step. The impact of these practices on target registration error (TRE) is not well-studied., Methods: A dry lab set-up consisting of a navigation system (Fusion ENT, Medtronic, Jacksonville, FL) and a sinus phantom with 2 mm radiopaque spheres in the sphenoid and ethmoid regions was developed. A CT (0.625 mm slice thickness) was obtained. Registration was performed with a contour-based protocol. Accuracy was determined using the software's distance measurement tool. Registration was performed with narrow-field (NF; forehead points medial to the mid-pupillary line) and wide field (WF; entire forehead) contour maps. An experienced rhinologist and a resident surgeon performed each registration in triplicate and TRE at the sphenoid and ethmoid markers was measured in triplicate., Results: WF mapping had a lower TRE than NF (1.09 mm [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.96-1.22] vs 1.68 mm [95% CI 1.50-1.86]). The experienced surgeon had a lower TRE compared to the resident (1.21 mm [95% CI 1.08-1.34] vs 1.54 mm [95% CI 1.35-1.74])., Conclusions: In this navigation model, wide field mapping offers better accuracy than narrow-field mapping, and an experienced surgeon seemed to achieve better accuracy than a resident surgeon. These observations have potential implications for the use of this technology in the operating room.

Background: Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal (EET) approaches can include complete resection of both superior turbinate (ST) for wider exposure. Moreover, ST resection has been associated with postoperative olfactory impairment., Objective: We sought to determine the impact of bilateral ST resection on olfaction during a transsphenoidal approach., Method: A prospective observational study was conducted on 29 patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery sparing the olfactory tracts at a tertiary academic center. Olfactory function was measured with Sniffin' Sticks at the preoperative visit, 2-weeks and 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. All components: odor threshold (OT), odor discrimination (OD), odor identification (OI) and composite scores (TDI = OT+OD+OI) were evaluated., Result: Study was completed in 15 patients with 14 excluded due to a variety of reasons. At 2 weeks, a significant decrease was noted in composite scores (32.3 ± 5.4 vs. 23.8 ± 5.8, P  < .05) and OT (7.7 vs. 3.2, P  < .05). There was a significant increase in olfactory scores between post-op weeks 2 and 6 to 8 weeks in TDI (23.8 vs. 31.4, P  < .05) as well as in OT (3.2 vs. 7.6, P  < .05), OD (9.4 vs. 11.1, P  < .05), and OI (11.1 vs. 12.7, P  < .05). No significant difference was found between TDI (32.3 ± 5.4 vs. 31.4 ± 5.1), OT (7.7 vs. 7.6), OD (11.4 vs. 11.1) and OI (13.2 vs. 12.7) from preoperative and 6-8 weeks postoperative visits., Conclusion: Patients undergoing bilateral ST resection during EET procedures experience transient hyposmia postoperatively. However, the olfactory function normalizes to preoperative levels at 6 to 8 weeks. The resection of the bilateral superior turbinate does not appear to decrease olfactory function.