Search

Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) still remains a blind surgery despite all available tumor localization methods. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) allows real-time visualization during all resection phases., Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted at the Veneto Institute of Oncology between January 2021 and June 2022. Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, T1-2 invasive cancer, or post-neoadjuvant tumors, suitable for BCS, were recruited. All breast cancer lesion types were included, i.e. solid palpable, solid non-palpable, non-solid non-palpable, and post-neoadjuvant treatment residual lesions. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to either IOUS or traditional surgery (TS) in a 1:1 ratio. The main outcomes were surgical margin involvement, reoperation rate, closest margin width, main specimen and cavity shaving margin volumes, excess healthy tissue removal, and calculated resection ratio (CRR)., Results: Overall, 160 patients were enrolled: 80 patients were allocated to the TS group and 80 to the IOUS group. IOUS significantly reduced specimen volumes (16.8 cm 3 [10.5-28.9] vs. 24.3 cm 3 [15.0-41.3]; p = 0.015), with wider closest resection margin width (2.0 mm [1.0-4.0] vs. 1.0 mm [0.5-2.0] after TS; p < 0.001). Tumor volume to specimen volume ratio was significantly higher after IOUS (4.7% [2.5-9.1] vs. 2.9% [0.8-5.2]; p < 0.001). IOUS yielded significantly better CRR (84.5% [46-120.8] vs. 114% [81.8-193.2] after TS; p < 0.001), lower involved margin rate (2.5 vs. 15%; p = 0.009) and reduced re-excision rate (2.5 vs. 12.5%; p = 0.032)., Conclusions: IOUS allows real-time resection margin visualization and continuous control during BCS. It showed clear superiority over TS in both oncological and surgical outcomes for all breast cancer lesion types. These results disfavor the paradigm of blind breast surgery., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Adenocarcinoma of the proximal esophagus is a rare clinical entity, with only 28 cases described in the literature. We report our experience with 9 patients and a review of the literature on this topic., Methods: Between 1980 and 2004, 1010 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (from a total of 4655 cancers, 3510 squamous and 1145 adeno) presenting at our department were retrospectively evaluated., Results: Nine patients (0.9%) had adenocarcinoma located in the proximal esophagus. Four patients (Group A) were considered unfit for surgery due to severe comorbidities and/or advanced stage disease. Three of them received endoscopic yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG)-laser therapy; 1 patient had feeding gastrostomy. Their median survival was 6 months (range, 3-9 months). The other 5 patients (Group B) were given a first-line cytoreductive treatment: 4 had complete response, and 1 patient did not complete chemotherapy due to toxicity and underwent surgery for residual disease. The median survival for these 5 patients receiving cytoreductive therapy was 36 months (range, 24-132 months). For the 4 patients with complete clinical response to cytoreductive treatment, the median survival was 54 months (range, 24-132 months)., Conclusion: First-line chemoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for adenocarcinoma of the proximal esophagus. Salvage surgery may be reserved for patients with incomplete response or recurrent disease.