Search

Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Background: Ampulla of Vater carcinoma (AVC) stage T3 was subdivided according to the degree of pancreatic invasion into T3a (≤ 0.5 cm) and T3b (> 0.5 cm) by the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system. However, the differences in clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between the two categories have not been well discussed., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 133 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for AVC at our institution between 2002 and 2020. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with AVC were analyzed, with a focus on the depth of pancreatic invasion. In addition, the survival outcomes of patients with T3 AVC were compared with those of patients with resectable pancreatic head carcinoma (R-PhC) who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy during the same period., Results: The overall survival (OS) in patients with T3b AVC (n = 12) was significantly worse than that in patients with T3a AVC (n = 39) [median survival time (MST) 9.2 vs. 74.5 months, p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis identified T3b tumor (hazard ratio 5.64, p = 0.009) as an independent prognostic factor. The OS of patients with T3a AVC was significantly better than that of patients with R-PhC who received adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 276, MST 35.0 months, p = 0.007). In contrast, the OS of patients with T3b AVC tended to be worse than that of patients with R-PhC managed without adjuvant chemotherapy, although this difference was not statistically significant (n = 163; MST, 17.5; p = 0.140)., Conclusions: AVC with > 0.5 cm invasion into the pancreas was associated with poor survival and represented advanced tumor progression to systemic disease., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: The information on the clinicopathologic/outcome differences between ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) has been conflicting to the extent that it still is questioned whether ACs need to be recognized separately from PCs., Methods: The characteristics of 413 ACs were compared with those of 547 PCs., Results: The ACs had a better prognosis than the PCs (5-year survival, 57 % vs 23 %; p < 0.001). Even the pancreatobiliary (PB)-type ACs had a better prognosis (5-year survival, 46 % vs 23 %; p < 0.001). Several differences also were identified as contributing factors: (1) the preinvasive adenomatous component often constituted a significant proportion of the mass in ACs (>50 % of the tumor in 16 % vs 1.5 %; p < 0.001); (2) the mean size of the carcinoma was smaller in ACs (2.5 vs 3.2 cm; p < 0.001): when matched for invasion size, the survival advantage of AC was minimized, and when matched for invasion size larger than 2 cm, the survival advantage of AC lost its statistical significance; (3) lymph node (LN) metastases were less common in ACs (49 % vs 71 %; p < 0.001); (4) the definitive R1 rate was lower in ACs (4 % vs 23.5 %; p < 0.001); and (5) non-PB and non-tubular adenocarcinoma types were more common in ACs (17 % vs 3 %; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Comparatively, ACs have better clinical survival than PCs. Potential contributing factors are the relative abundance of the preinvasive component, smaller invasion, lower LN metastasis rate, higher resectability, and common occurrence of less aggressive histologic phenotypes (intestinal, medullary, mucinous). However, this survival advantage is sustained even in PB-type ACs, highlighting the importance of accurately determining the site of origin., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Grade 1/2 PanNETs are mostly managed similarly, typically without any adjunct treatment with the belief that their overall metastasis rate is low. In oncology literature, Ki67-index of 10% is increasingly being used as the cutoff in stratifying patients to different protocols, although there are no systematic pathology-based studies supporting this approach., Methods: Ki67-index was correlated with clinicopathologic parameters in 190 resected PanNETs. A validation cohort (n = 145) was separately analyzed., Results: In initial cohort, maximally selected rank statistics method revealed 12% to be the discriminatory cutoff (close to 10% rule of thumb). G2b cases had liver/distant metastasis rate of almost threefold higher than that of G2a and showed significantly higher frequency of all histopathologic signs of aggressiveness (tumor size, perineural/vascular invasion, infiltrative growth pattern, lymph node metastasis). In validation cohort, these figures were as striking. When all cases were analyzed together, compared with G1, the G2b category had nine times higher liver/distant metastasis rate (6.1 vs. 58.5%; p < 0.001) and three times higher lymph node metastasis rate (20.5 vs. 65.1%; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: G2b PanNETs act very similar to G3, supporting management protocols that regard them as potential therapy candidates. Concerning local management, metastatic behavior in G2b cases indicate they may not be as amenable for conservative approaches, such as watchful waiting or enucleation. This substaging should be considered into diagnostic guidelines, and clinical trials need to be devised to determine the more appropriate management protocols for G2b (10% to ≤ 20%) group, which shows liver/distant metastasis in more than half of the cases, which at minimum warrants closer follow-up., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Current nodal staging (N-staging) of ampullary carcinoma in the TNM staging system distinguishes between node-negative (N0) and node-positive (N1) disease but does not consider the metastatic lymph node (LN) number., Methods: Overall, 313 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma were categorized as N0, N1 (1-2 metastatic LNs), or N2 (≥3 metastatic LNs), as proposed by Kang et al. Clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) of the three groups were compared., Results: The median number of LNs examined was 11, and LN metastasis was present in 142 cases (45 %). When LN-positive cases were re-classified according to the proposed staging system, 82 were N1 (26 %) and 60 were N2 (19 %). There was a significant correlation between proposed N-stage and lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, increased tumor size (each p < 0.001), and surgical margin positivity (p = 0.001). The median OS in LN-negative cases was significantly longer than that in LN-positive cases (107.5 vs. 32 months; p < 0.001). Patients with N1 and N2 disease had median survivals of 40 and 24.5 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). In addition, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 88, 76, 62 %, respectively, for N0; 90, 55, 31.5 %, respectively, for N1; and 68, 34, 30 %, respectively for N2 (p < 0.001). Even with multivariate modeling, the association between higher proposed N stage and shorter survival persisted (hazard ratio 1.6 for N1 and 1.9 for N2; p = 0.018)., Conclusions: Classification of nodal status in ampullary carcinomas based on the number of metastatic LNs has a significant prognostic value. A revised N-staging classification system should be incorporated into the TNM staging of ampullary cancers.