8 results on '"Jobanputra, P"'
Search Results
2. OP0056 Can We Replace Temporal Artery Biopsy with Cranial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of GIANT Cell Arteritis? A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Ultrasound in Routine Clinical Practice: Table 1.
- Author
-
Croft, A., primary, Thompson, N., additional, Duddy, M., additional, Khattak, F., additional, Mollan, S., additional, and Jobanputra, P., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. AB0279 Incidence of diabetes and effect of etanercept and adalimumab on hba1c over 1 year: data from a randomised trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
- Author
-
De Pablo, P., primary, Maggs, F., additional, Carruthers, D., additional, Faizal, A., additional, Pugh, M., additional, and Jobanputra, P., additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Cellular immunity to cartilage proteoglycans: relevance to the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis.
- Author
-
Jobanputra, P, primary, Choy, E H, additional, Kingsley, G H, additional, Sieper, J, additional, Palacios-Boix, A A, additional, Heinegard, D, additional, and Panayi, G S, additional
- Published
- 1992
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Discovertebral destruction in ankylosing spondylitis complicated by spinal cord compression.
- Author
-
Jobanputra, P, Kirkham, B, Duke, O, Crockard, A, and Panayi, G S
- Abstract
A 56 year old man with ankylosing spondylitis and discovertebral destruction presented with signs of spinal cord compression that was the result of the soft tissue reaction occurring at the level of the discovertebral destruction. This case emphasises the importance of early recognition, use of appropriate imaging techniques (computed tomographic myelography or magnetic resonance), and operative intervention in the management of this rare complication of ankylosing spondylitis. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 1988
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Patterns and predictors of skin score change in early diffuse systemic sclerosis from the European Scleroderma Observational Study.
- Author
-
Herrick AL, Peytrignet S, Lunt M, Pan X, Hesselstrand R, Mouthon L, Silman AJ, Dinsdale G, Brown E, Czirják L, Distler JHW, Distler O, Fligelstone K, Gregory WJ, Ochiel R, Vonk MC, Ancuţa C, Ong VH, Farge D, Hudson M, Matucci-Cerinic M, Balbir-Gurman A, Midtvedt Ø, Jobanputra P, Jordan AC, Stevens W, Moinzadeh P, Hall FC, Agard C, Anderson ME, Diot E, Madhok R, Akil M, Buch MH, Chung L, Damjanov NS, Gunawardena H, Lanyon P, Ahmad Y, Chakravarty K, Jacobsen S, MacGregor AJ, McHugh N, Müller-Ladner U, Riemekasten G, Becker M, Roddy J, Carreira PE, Fauchais AL, Hachulla E, Hamilton J, İnanç M, McLaren JS, van Laar JM, Pathare S, Proudman SM, Rudin A, Sahhar J, Coppere B, Serratrice C, Sheeran T, Veale DJ, Grange C, Trad GS, and Denton CP
- Subjects
- Adult, Area Under Curve, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, RNA Polymerase III analysis, ROC Curve, Scleroderma, Diffuse enzymology, Scleroderma, Diffuse pathology, Skin pathology, Scleroderma, Diffuse diagnosis, Severity of Illness Index, Skin Tests statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Objectives: Our aim was to use the opportunity provided by the European Scleroderma Observational Study to (1) identify and describe those patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) with progressive skin thickness, and (2) derive prediction models for progression over 12 months, to inform future randomised controlled trials (RCTs)., Methods: The modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) was recorded every 3 months in 326 patients. 'Progressors' were defined as those experiencing a 5-unit and 25% increase in mRSS score over 12 months (±3 months). Logistic models were fitted to predict progression and, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, were compared on the basis of the area under curve (AUC), accuracy and positive predictive value (PPV)., Results: 66 patients (22.5%) progressed, 227 (77.5%) did not (33 could not have their status assessed due to insufficient data). Progressors had shorter disease duration (median 8.1 vs 12.6 months, P=0.001) and lower mRSS (median 19 vs 21 units, P=0.030) than non-progressors. Skin score was highest, and peaked earliest, in the anti-RNA polymerase III (Pol3+) subgroup (n=50). A first predictive model (including mRSS, duration of skin thickening and their interaction) had an accuracy of 60.9%, AUC of 0.666 and PPV of 33.8%. By adding a variable for Pol3 positivity, the model reached an accuracy of 71%, AUC of 0.711 and PPV of 41%., Conclusions: Two prediction models for progressive skin thickening were derived, for use both in clinical practice and for cohort enrichment in RCTs. These models will inform recruitment into the many clinical trials of dcSSc projected for the coming years., Trial Registration Number: NCT02339441., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ALH has done consultancy work for Actelion, served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Apricus, received research funding and speaker’s fees from Actelion, and speaker’s fees from GSK. JHWD has consultancy relationships and/or has received research funding from Actelion, BMS, Celgene, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, JB Therapeutics, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, UCB, GSK, Array BioPharma, Active Biotech, Galapagos, Inventiva, Medac, Pfizer, Anamar and RuiYi, and is stock owner of 4D Science. OD has received consultancy fees from 4D Science, Actelion, Active Biotech, Bayer, Biogenidec, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, EpiPharm, Ergonex, espeRare Foundation, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Inventiva, Lilly, Medac, Medimmune, Pharmacyclics, Pfizer, Serodapharm, Sinoxa and UCB, and received research grants from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ergonex, Pfizer and Sanofi, and has a patent mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis licensed. WJG has received teaching fees from Pfizer. CA has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, MSD, BMS and Novartis, and has received research funding and speaker fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, MSD, BMS and Novartis. FCH has received research funding from Actelion. MEA has undertaken advisory board work and received honoraria from Actelion, and received speaker’s fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb. NSD has done consultancy for AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche and MSD, and received speaker’s fees from AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Richter Gedeon, Roche and MSD. HG has done consultancy work and received honoraria from Actelion. UM-L is funded in part by EUSTAR, EULAR and the European Community (Desscipher programme). JMvL has received honoraria from Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, MSD and BMS. SP has received research grants from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Australia, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline Australia and Pfizer, and speaker fees from Actelion. AR receives funding from AstraZeneca. CPD has done consultancy for GSK, Actelion, Bayer, Inventiva and Merck-Serono, received research grant funding from GSK, Actelion, CSL Behring and Inventiva, received speaker’s fees from Bayer and given trial advice to Merck-Serono., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Treatment outcome in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: the European Scleroderma Observational Study (ESOS).
- Author
-
Herrick AL, Pan X, Peytrignet S, Lunt M, Hesselstrand R, Mouthon L, Silman A, Brown E, Czirják L, Distler JHW, Distler O, Fligelstone K, Gregory WJ, Ochiel R, Vonk M, Ancuţa C, Ong VH, Farge D, Hudson M, Matucci-Cerinic M, Balbir-Gurman A, Midtvedt Ø, Jordan AC, Jobanputra P, Stevens W, Moinzadeh P, Hall FC, Agard C, Anderson ME, Diot E, Madhok R, Akil M, Buch MH, Chung L, Damjanov N, Gunawardena H, Lanyon P, Ahmad Y, Chakravarty K, Jacobsen S, MacGregor AJ, McHugh N, Müller-Ladner U, Riemekasten G, Becker M, Roddy J, Carreira PE, Fauchais AL, Hachulla E, Hamilton J, İnanç M, McLaren JS, van Laar JM, Pathare S, Proudman S, Rudin A, Sahhar J, Coppere B, Serratrice C, Sheeran T, Veale DJ, Grange C, Trad GS, and Denton CP
- Subjects
- Adult, Antibodies, Antinuclear immunology, Autoantibodies immunology, Cohort Studies, DNA Topoisomerases, Type I, Early Medical Intervention, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nuclear Proteins immunology, Prospective Studies, RNA Polymerase III immunology, Scleroderma, Diffuse immunology, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Cyclophosphamide therapeutic use, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Methotrexate therapeutic use, Mycophenolic Acid therapeutic use, Scleroderma, Diffuse drug therapy
- Abstract
Objectives: The rarity of early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) makes randomised controlled trials very difficult. We aimed to use an observational approach to compare effectiveness of currently used treatment approaches., Methods: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of early dcSSc (within three years of onset of skin thickening). Clinicians selected one of four protocols for each patient: methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclophosphamide or 'no immunosuppressant'. Patients were assessed three-monthly for up to 24 months. The primary outcome was the change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Confounding by indication at baseline was accounted for using inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weights. As a secondary outcome, an IPT-weighted Cox model was used to test for differences in survival., Results: Of 326 patients recruited from 50 centres, 65 were prescribed methotrexate, 118 MMF, 87 cyclophosphamide and 56 no immunosuppressant. 276 (84.7%) patients completed 12 and 234 (71.7%) 24 months follow-up (or reached last visit date). There were statistically significant reductions in mRSS at 12 months in all groups: -4.0 (-5.2 to -2.7) units for methotrexate, -4.1 (-5.3 to -2.9) for MMF, -3.3 (-4.9 to -1.7) for cyclophosphamide and -2.2 (-4.0 to -0.3) for no immunosuppressant (p value for between-group differences=0.346). There were no statistically significant differences in survival between protocols before (p=0.389) or after weighting (p=0.440), but survival was poorest in the no immunosuppressant group (84.0%) at 24 months., Conclusions: These findings may support using immunosuppressants for early dcSSc but suggest that overall benefit is modest over 12 months and that better treatments are needed., Trial Registration Number: NCT02339441., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ALH has done consultancy work for Actelion, served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Apricus, received research funding and speaker's fees from Actelion, and speaker's fees from GSK. JHWD has consultancy relationships and/or has received research funding from Actelion, BMS, Celgene, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, JB Therapeutics, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, UCB, GSK, Array Biopharma, Active Biotech, Galapagos, Inventiva, Medac, Pfizer, Anamar and RuiYi and is stock owner of 4D Science GmbH. OD has received consultancy fees from 4D Science, Actelion, Active Biotech, Bayer, Biogenidec, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, EpiPharm, Ergonex, espeRare Foundation, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Inventiva, Lilly, Medac, Medimmune, Pharmacyclics, Pfizer, Serodapharm, and Sinoxa and received research grants from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ergonex, Pfizer and Sanofi, and has a patent mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis licenced. WG has received teaching fees from Pfizer. FH has received research funding from Actelion. MEA has undertaken advisory board work and received honoraria from Actelion, and received speaker's fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb. LC has done advisory board work for Gilead and served Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Cytori and Reata. HG has done consultancy work and received honoraria from Actelion. UM-L is funded in part bu EUSTAR/EULAR. JMvL has received honoraria from Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, MSD and BMS. AR receives funding from AstraZeneca. CPD has done consultancy for GSK, Actelion, Bayer, Inventiva and Merck-Serono, received research grant funding from GSK, Actelion, CSL Behring and Inventiva, received speaker's fees from Bayer and given trial advice to Merck-Serono., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Utility of ultrasound joint counts in the prediction of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with very early synovitis.
- Author
-
Filer A, de Pablo P, Allen G, Nightingale P, Jordan A, Jobanputra P, Bowman S, Buckley CD, and Raza K
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Arthritis, Rheumatoid complications, Arthritis, Rheumatoid pathology, Early Diagnosis, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Metacarpophalangeal Joint diagnostic imaging, Metatarsophalangeal Joint diagnostic imaging, Middle Aged, Synovitis etiology, Synovitis pathology, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Wrist Joint diagnostic imaging, Young Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid diagnostic imaging, Synovitis diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Objectives: Early therapy improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is therefore important to improve predictive algorithms for RA in early disease. This study evaluated musculoskeletal ultrasound, a sensitive tool for the detection of synovitis and erosions, as a predictor of outcome in very early synovitis., Methods: 58 patients with clinically apparent synovitis of at least one joint and symptom duration of ≤3 months underwent clinical, laboratory, radiographic and 38 joint ultrasound assessments and were followed prospectively for 18 months, determining outcome by 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism criteria. Sensitivity and specificity for 1987 RA criteria were determined for ultrasound variables and logistic regression models were then fitted to evaluate predictive ability over and above the Leiden rule., Results: 16 patients resolved, 13 developed non-RA persistent disease and 29 developed RA by 1987 criteria. Ultrasound demonstrated subclinical wrist, elbow, knee, ankle and metatarsophalangeal joint involvement in patients developing RA. Large joint and proximal interphalangeal joint ultrasound variables had poor predictive ability, whereas ultrasound erosions lacked specificity. Regression analysis demonstrated that greyscale wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint involvement, and power Doppler involvement of metatarsophalangeal joints provided independently predictive data. Global ultrasound counts were inferior to minimal power Doppler counts, which significantly improved area under the curve values from 0.905 to 0.962 combined with the Leiden rule., Conclusion: In a longitudinal study, extended ultrasound joint evaluation significantly increased detection of joint involvement in all regions and outcome groups. Greyscale and power Doppler scanning of metacarpophalangeal joints, wrists and metatarsophalangeal joints provides the optimum minimal ultrasound data to improve on clinical predictive models for RA.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.