Search

Introduction: Nicorandil is a commonly prescribed antianginal medication that has been found to be associated with painful anal ulceration. The incidence of this complication is unknown. We have used the best data available to us to make an estimate of this figure in a health district with a remarkably stable population of approximately 200,000 people., Methods: using an electronic search of all letters generated from colorectal and gastroenterology clinics as well as endoscopy reports from January 2004 to November 2010, patients with anal ulceration who were taking nicorandil were identified. Other causes of ulceration were excluded by biopsy in the majority of cases. The central hospital and community pharmacy database was interrogated to estimate the number of patients who were prescribed nicorandil over a six-year period (2004-2010)., Results: A total of 30 patients (24 men, 6 women) with a median age of 79.5 years were identified who fulfilled the criteria of: taking nicorandil; having no other identified cause for anal ulceration; and achieving eventual healing after withdrawal of nicorandil. In the six-year period an estimated mean of 1,379 patients were prescribed nicorandil each year. The mean annual incidence of anal ulcers among nicorandil users is therefore calculated to be in the region of 0.37%., Conclusions: Anal ulceration appears to occur in approximately four in every thousand patients prescribed nicorandil each year. Prescribing physicians should explain the risk of this unpleasant complication to their patients.

A study of whether the lower border of the normal liver, if it extended below the costal margin, could be reliably identified by clinical examination was undertaken in 42 patients in whom there was no clinical, biochemical or scintographic evidence of liver disease. Two clinical observers independently agreed that in 10 of these patients the liver extended infracostally. However, scintiscanning demonstrated that 30 patients had livers extending below the costal margin and that 2 of the 10 livers clinically identified did not in fact lie infracostally. Thus whilst the normal liver commonly extended below the costal margin, recognition of this extension by clinical methods occurred no more frequently than would be expected by chance. It is concluded that the confident clinical finding of a liver projecting below the costal margin should suggest that the organ is abnormal.