Search

Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven over the years to be a viable alternative to open surgery. A rare but severe complication is represented by the valve migration. We report a case of TAVI complication due to the loss of the prosthetic valve in the abdominal aorta treated by endovascular approach. Methods An 88-year-old patient with severe aortic valve stenosis, symptomatic for dyspnea was proposed for a TAVI because considered at high risk for surgery. During the TAVI procedure, the undeployed device (Edwards SAPIEN 3 - Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) detached from its delivery system. Several attempts to withdraw the valve fluctuating in the aorta into its supporting system were performed without success. An emergency endovascular treatment was promptly planned to obtain the exclusion from the flow of the embolized valve. Under local anaesthesia, through the percutaneous femoral access already present, a tube aortic endograft (EndurantTM II, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA; ETTF2828C70EE) was successfully introduced and deployed in the infrarenal aorta without any related complications. The embolized valve was completely covered by the endgraft and thus fixed to the aortic wall. The first postoperative computer tomography angiography (CTA) confirmed the correct placement of the endograft, the exclusion of the valve from the flow and the patency of the great vessels. No perioperative or postoperative complications were recorded. The patient was discharged on the ninth postoperative day with the indication to a new attempt of TAVI, through transapical access. Conclusions In case of intraprocedural loss of an undeplyed valve during TAVI, the valve fixing through endograft deployment in infrarenal aorta is a possible solution.

Background Insufficient evidence is available to recommend a particular strategy for the treatment of type 1a endoleaks (T1aELs) after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to report outcomes of the different treatment modalities proposed for persistent and late-occurring T1aEL after EVAR. Methods A systematic review of the literature (database searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library) was undertaken until August 2018. Studies about treatment of T1aEL after EVAR (excluding intraoperative treatments during the first EVAR) presenting a series of 5 or more patients with extractable outcome data (at least intraoperative and/or early results) were included. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using a random-effects model. Results A total of 39 nonrandomized studies were included (714 patients; 88.1% males, 95% confidence interval [CI] 84.5-91.7; weighted mean age 75.76 years, 95% CI 74.11-77.4). Overall estimated technical success (TS) and clinical success (CS) rates were 93.2% (95% CI 90.5-95.8) and 88.2% (95% CI 84.5-91.9), respectively. Two hundred eighteen patients underwent proximal extension (98.1% TS, 95% CI 96.3-99.8), 131 chimney EVAR (93.9% TS, 95% CI 89.9-97.9), 97 fenestrated EVAR (86.2% TS, 95% CI 77.3-95.1), 90 open conversion (96.5% TS, 95% CI 93-100), 71 embolization (95.2% TS, 95% CI 90.4-100), 35 endostapling (57.2% TS, 95% CI 14.1-100), and 72 conservative treatment (75.4% CS, 95% CI 56.4-94.5). Estimated overall 30-day mortality was 3.2% (95% CI 1.7-4.7), and it was higher for patients undergoing open surgery (6.6%, 95% CI 1.7-11.5). Overall, endoleak resolution during the mean follow-up of 19.4 months (95% CI 15.45-23.36) was maintained in 91% of the patients (95% CI 87.7-94.3). Conclusions T1aEL repair appeared generally feasible, with good early to midterm outcomes. Different treatments are available, and the choice should be based on endoleak characteristics, aortic anatomy, and the patient's surgical risk. Conservative treatment and endoleak embolization should be considered only in selected cases, such as low-flow endoleaks and unfit patients.

Background To report early and mid-term results of endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) by using Cook Zenith fenestrated/branched endografts (FB-EVAR) in high surgical risk patients unfit for open repair (OR). Methods Between January 2012 and April 2015, all the patients with TAAA, considered at high surgical risk for OR and treated by Cook Zenith FB-EVAR, were prospectively enrolled. Patients were studied using a thoracoabdominal computer tomography angiography (CTA) and dedicated software for advanced vessels analysis. Follow-up was performed by duplex ultrasound (DU), contrast-enhanced DU, and/or CTA. Early end points were the following: technical success (TS), spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and 30-day morbidity/mortality. Follow-up end points were the following: survival, TAAA-related mortality, target visceral vessels (TVV) patency, type I/III endoleaks, and freedom from reinterventions (FFRs). Results Thirty patients (male 77%, mean age 73 ± 7 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists 3/4 60%/40%) affected by TAAA type I (4%), II (21%), III (57%), and IV (18%) were enrolled. The mean aneurysm diameter was 66 ± 14 mm. The overall number of TVV was 107 (3.5 ± 0.9 vessels/patients). Custom-made and off-the-shelf endografts were used in 22 (73%) and 8 (23%) cases, respectively. The procedure was performed in multiple steps in 23 cases (77%). There were not intraoperative mortality and type I–III endoleaks, and the TVV patency was 97% (104/107). TS was 87%.There were 2 irreversible paraplegias (6.6%) and 1 reversible paraparesis (3.4%). Postoperative cardiac and pulmonary complications occurred in 2 (6.6%) and 2 (6.6%) patients, respectively. Renal function worsening (≥30% of the baseline level) was detected in 4 cases (13%). The 30-day mortality was 6.6%. Survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 90%, 85%, and 68%, respectively. There was no TAAA-related mortality. The TVV patency at 3, 6, and 24 months was 95%, 90%, and 90%, respectively, and there were no type I–III endoleaks. FFRs at 6, 12, and 24 months was 88%. Conclusion The endovascular repair of TAAA by using Cook Zenith fenestrated/branched endografts is feasible with acceptable technical and clinical results at early to mid-term results in patients at high surgical risk unfit for OR.