Search

There has been a revolution in the management of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) over the last two decades due to the increasing development of endovascular techniques, with the prime example being thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). However, many controversies concerning the use of TEVAR in TBAD exist. For instance, there is little available evidence suggesting any differences in demographics, disease characteristics, intervention technicalities and clinical outcomes between males and females as well as different ethnicities when undergoing TEVAR for TBAD, both in the short and long-term. Also, there is no risk prediction model/tool available.The objective of this international study is to describe and delineate the disparities between male and female patients of different ethnicities in terms of demographics, disease and interventional characteristics, and clinical outcomes.Over 17 years a total of 58 TBAD patients were admitted to two tertiary vascular centres and treated using TEVAR. Mortality, post-operative complications and reintervention data were recorded for the first 30 days after the procedure as well as during follow-up. Follow-up for all patients lasted until the study endpoint or until a patient's death. Data was analysed retrospectively using IBM SPSS 26 for Windows.Mean age was similar between the two groups, with the majority of patients in both being Caucasian. More than half of the males had complicated TBAD, whilst the majority of females were classed as having uncomplicated disease. The most commonly utilised proximal and distal landing zone for the TEVAR stent-graft was zone 2 and zone 4, respectively. The mean proximal stent diameter was significantly larger in males compared to females (p=0.004). The difference in mean distal diameter between the two groups was insignificant (p=0.721). The mean total stent coverage of the thoracic aorta was 251.3 mm in male patients compared to 291.2 mm in females (p=0.203). A total of 32 patients underwent adjunctive procedures. Seven (17%) of the males had one or more post-operative complications compared to 2 (12%) females. Nine (22%) males underwent a reintervention procedure post-TEVAR compared to only 1 (6%) female (p=0.136). Overall, males had a mortality rate of 24% (n=10) compared to 41% of females (n=7) (p=0.201). Estimated survival of males and females post-TEVAR was 80.4 ± 9.6 months and 69.7 ± 14.4 months (p=0.428). For the total population, the number of stent-grafts was inversely correlated with mortality.Despite the favourable clinical outcomes achieved by TEVAR in TBAD, there remains a grey area concerning its management. Thus, it is important to perform risk stratification of individual patients using their demographics and comorbidities, particularly scrutinizing gender and ethnic origin when considering intervention for TBAD to achieve optimum results.

Acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is relatively uncommon with an estimated incidence of up to 8 cases per 100,000 individuals annually. It can be classified based on presenting clinical and radiological features into complicated and uncomplicated. Following the initial tear, the direction and extent of the dissection flap is unpredictable, possibly propagating proximally or distally. One consequence of a dissection flap is the occurrence of organ malperfusion by occlusion of the origin of the branch vessel. The 2 types of malperfusion in TBAD are static and dynamic, with the latter being the more common mechanism. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has demonstrated its high safety and efficacy when used for TBAD and subsequent malperfusion.This original study specifically examines patients diagnosed with acute TBAD and treated with TEVAR at a single vascular unit, focusing on those presenting with organ malperfusion.Over 16 years, 28 TBAD patients were admitted to a single center and treated using TEVAR. After clinical examination, all patients underwent computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen/pelvis to confirm the diagnosis and classify the extent of the dissection proximally and distally. Once diagnosed, patients were transferred to the high dependency unit and started on blood pressure medication. Subsequent computed tomography scans were performed to classify patients, after which TEVAR was performed.Twenty five patients underwent TEVAR for TBAD, of which 8 (32%) had symptoms of organ malperfusion. The majority of cases presented with hypertension (89%), describing a sudden onset of upper/midthoracic pain. The origin of the left subclavian artery was occluded in 14 (56%) patients with 9 (64%) needing an extra-anatomical bypass. There was only a single mortality due to a posterior circulation stroke 2 days after TEVAR. Median (range) length of coverage of thoracic aorta by the stent-graft was 33 (15-35) cm. The true lumen (TL) perfused the celiac artery in 6/8 malperfusion patients, superior mesenteric artery in 7/8, right renal artery in 6/8, and, conversely, left renal artery in only 2/8.Complicated TBADs behave in an unpredictable manner as it seems the propagating intimal flap invariably maintains vital organ perfusion via the TL. Maintenance of abdominal vessels perfusion from the TL following TEVAR is vital to ensuring optimal results.

Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening medical emergency that affects an estimated 3-4 people per 100,000 annually, with 40% of cases classified as type B AD (TBAD). TBAD can be further classified as being complicated (co-TBAD) or uncomplicated (un-TBAD) based on the presence or absence of certain features such as malperfusion and rupture. TBAD can be managed conservatively with optimal medical therapy (OMT), or invasively with open surgical repair (OSR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), depending on several factors such as type of TBAD and its clinical acuity. The cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefit profile, of these strategies must be given equal consideration. However, TBAD studies featuring cost analyses are limited within the literature. This narrative review aims to address the gap in the literature on cost-effectiveness of TBAD treatments by providing an overview of cost analyses comparing OMT with TEVAR in un-TBAD and TEVAR with OSR in co-TBAD. Another aim is to provide a market analysis of the commercially available TEVAR devices.A comprehensive literature search was performed using several search engines including PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase to identify and extract relevant studies.Several TEVAR devices are available commercially on the global market costing $12,000-19,495. Nevertheless, the Terumo Aortic RELAY® stent graft seems to be the most cost-effective, yielding highly favourable clinical outcomes. Despite the higher initial cost of TEVAR, evidence in the literature strongly suggest that it is superior to OMT for un-TBAD on the long-term. In addition, TEVAR is well established in the literature as being gold-standard repair technique for co-TBAD, replacing OSR by offering a more optimal cost-benefit profile through lower costs and improved results.The introduction of TEVAR has revolutionized the field of aortovascular surgery by offering a highly efficacious and long-term cost-effective treatment for TBAD.

The purpose of this investigation was to measure vascular input impedance in infrainguinal vein grafts and assess the importance of clinical and hemodynamic parameters in predicting graft patency. Fifty-seven patients undergoing infrainguinal vein bypass grafting for limb salvage (n = 40) or claudication (n = 17) were prospectively studied. At the time of revascularization, simultaneously acquired intraluminal pressure and blood flow waveforms were digitized at 200 Hz and subjected to Fourier transformation in near real-time. Input impedance was calculated at baseline (immediately after unclamping) and after stimulation with either papaverine or completion arteriography. Resistance (Rin) was calculated as mean pressure divided by mean blood flow (Q). Characteristic impedance (Z0) was calculated as the mean of harmonics 3-10. Intraoperative data acquisition required approximately 5 min, utilized the completion angiography cannula already in place, and was uncomplicated in all patients. Stimulation with either papaverine or arteriography resulted in increased Q (72 +/- 7 to 146 +/- 11 ml/min, p0.001), decreased Rin (126 +/- 13 to 52 +/- 4 x 10(3) dyne.s.cm-5, p0.001), and slightly decreased Z0 (18 +/- 2 to 15 +/- 1, p = 0.002). After a mean follow-up of 20 months, the 2-year primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival rates were 61 +/- 8%, 74 +/- 7%, 76 +/- 6%, and 86 +/- 6%, respectively. Primary patency was not associated with any of the clinical variables studied including age, sex, smoking history, history of previous vascular surgery, hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, creatinine, indication for revascularization (claudication versus limb salvage), anesthesia (general versus regional), or level of distal anastomosis (popliteal versus infrapopliteal). Furthermore, there was no association between primary patency and baseline Q, baseline Rin, or stimulated Z0. However, using univariate analysis, patency was positively associated with decreased stimulated Rin (p = 0.002), elevated stimulated Q (p = 0.006), and decreased baseline Z0 (p = 0.02). Multiple regression analysis identified stimulated Rin as the only independent predictor of primary patency (p = 0.002). Stimulated Rinor = 50 x 10(3) dyne.s.cm-5 was 71% sensitive and 65% specific for graft failure. It is concluded that 1) vascular input impedance can be simply and reliably measured in the operating room, and 2) elevated stimulated Rin is an independent predictor of primary patency.