Search

Gradual increases in resident autonomy with attending physician oversight is crucial to developing safe and competent surgeonsAll VASQIP records for BKA from 2000 to 2020 were examined and categorized based on whether the attending was scrubbed during the case. Case matching was performed based on preoperative comorbidities; 30-day postoperative outcomes, including a return to the operating room, wound infection, and mortality, were assessed in addition to operative time, hospital length of stay, and transfusion requirements. Student's t-test and Fisher's Exact Test were utilized.A total of 13,208 BKA VASQIP records were obtained. After case control matching, 2,688 cases remained. Cases were identified with the attending surgeon noted as being scrubbed during the case (n = 1,344), or not scrubbed (n = 1,344). Patients were similar in comorbidities across both groups. No statistically significant difference in operative time (1.52 hr ± 0.78 vs. 1.47 hr ± 0.75, P = 0.08), 30-day mortality (3.3% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.05), or complication rate (19.5% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.25). Resident independent cases were noted to have slightly longer postop length of stay (12.47 days ± 12.69 vs. 15.33 days ± 20.56, P 0.01) and operative bleeding requiring more than 4 units transfused (0.3% vs. 1.3%, P ≤ 0.01).Resident independent operating during below-the-knee amputation at VA hospitals is associated with an increased length of stay and blood transfusion. There was no statistically significant increase in operative time, 30-day mortality, or total complication rate. Further research is required to assess the risks associated with surgical training, resident supervision, and resident preparedness for independent practice.

The first two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved stents for treatment of iliofemoral vein obstruction, Boston Scientific's Vici and BD's Venovo venous stent systems, were both recalled in early 2021 within years of entering the market. Given the recent addition of patient issues as a publicly reported variable by the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, we set forth to analyze adverse event reports in MAUDE to better characterize issues reported for each system.MAUDE was queried for all adverse event reports for brands "Vici" and "Venovo" from their respective US FDA market approval dates to August 19, 2021. Reported device issues, patient issues, and interventions performed for each adverse event were compiled and compared using Fisher's exact test.A total of 50 unique adverse event reports were compiled for the Vici system and 341 for the Venovo system. The most common device issue reported for the Vici system was migration (48% vs. 0%; P = 0.0001) versus activation failure in Venovo (85% vs. 4%; P = 0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of Venovo reports specified no patient complications or symptoms (90% vs. 26%; P = 0.0001), with no intervention performed (89% vs. 32%; P = 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of Vici devices were extracted (8% vs. 2%; P = 0.01), required use of a new device (26% vs. 5%; P = 0.0001), and required application of a second stent within the venous stent initially placed (28% vs. 2%; P = 0.0001). The rate of intervention with balloon expansion was not significantly different between the Vici and Venovo systems (6% vs. 2%; P = 0.08).While 2 venous stent systems were recalled simultaneously, significant differences exist between reported device issues in MAUDE and whether patient injury was involved and well described. Our data suggest that despite recent improvements to MAUDE reporting, additional standardization with specificity regarding patient issues and interventions is needed to assist vascular surgeons monitoring real-time adverse event trends for vascular devices.

BACKGROUND Lower extremity bypass (LEB) revascularization can be performed under general (GA) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA). Studies show that the use of NA may decrease morbidity, 30-day mortality, and hospital length-of-stay (LOS). The goal of our analysis is to examine the differences in postsurgical outcomes following LEB between patients who undergo GA compared to NA in the Veteran Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database. METHODS After IRB approval, the VASQIP database was assessed for patients who underwent LEB between 1998-2018. Only infrainguinal bypass procedures and anesthesia type classified as "general," "epidural," or "spinal" were included. The neuraxial cohort includes both spinal and epidural anesthesia patients. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI), a validated measure of frailty, was additionally calculated for each patient. Chi squared, paired t-test, and binary logistic regression were used to compare the cohorts. RESULTS During this period, 22,960 veterans underwent LEB recorded in VASQIP. Compared to those who underwent surgery under GA, patients with procedures performed using NA were older (66.4 ± 9.6 years vs. 65.3 ± 9 years respectively; P

Medical societies such as the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) have been encouraging the use of social media at annual meetings by establishing unique meeting hashtags (eg. #VAM19, #SIR19ATX). These two specialties have similar number of active physicians and share procedural interests. We set forth to understand differences in Twitter activity and engagement by analyzing Twitter outputs from the vascular annual meeting (VAM) and the interventional radiology annual meeting (IRAM) in 2019.Tweets with "#VAM19" and "#SIR19ATX" from 30 days before and 30 days after respective meetings were collected. Proportion of distinct Twitter users relative to total number of meeting attendees, number of posts per user, number of hashtags per post, and number of engagement metrics (likes, replies, and retweets) were collected for comparison. As for the top 100 most liked tweets, specialty-related hashtags were categorized into identity, diversity, education, procedure, and medical care, and the authors of these tweets were also identified for comparison. Student's t-test* and Fisher's ExactA total of 362 and 1944 tweets were collected from the VAM and IRAM in 2019. There was no difference in proportion of active Twitter users relative to total number of meeting attendees between the VAM (7.5%) and IRAM (7.7%). Average number of posts per user from the VAM and IRAM showed no significant difference. However, tweets related to IRAM had significantly higher number of hashtags per post (2.67±1.96) than ones related to VAM (1.78±1.26) (P0.0001*). Additionally, these tweets on average received significantly higher number of likes (P0.0001*), retweets (P0.0001*), and replies (P0.0001*) than ones related to the VAM. Specialty-related hashtags from the 100 most liked tweets showed significantly greater proportion of hashtags associated with specialty identity (4% vs 28.6%, P0.0001**), diversity (2.9% vs 8.0%, p=0.0268**), and education (1.1% vs 9.1%, p=0.0004**) in tweets related to the IRAM whereas the proportion of hashtags associated with procedure and medical care was similar between the two meetings. Lastly, the 100 most liked tweets were authored by trainees (p=0.005*) and official societies (p=0.003*) in significantly greater proportion in IRAM whereas academic institutions/training hospitals authored in significantly greater proportion (p=0.004*) from the VAM. Contributions from attending physician users to the 100 most liked tweets were similar between the two meetings.Analysis of Twitter activity centered around #VAM19 and #SIR19ATX indicates that there was no significant difference in proportion of Twitter users relative to meeting attendees and average number of posts per user. However, tweets with #SIR19ATX had significantly higher number of hashtags per post and had greater level of engagement than ones with #VAM19. The top 100 most liked tweets from the two meetings differed in proportion of hashtags related to specialty identity, diversity, and education, as well as proportion of contributing authors identified as trainees, official societies, and academic institutions/training hospitals. These data should help the SVS and its members to establish a more directed social media effort to facilitate its use during national gatherings.

Rapid and objective preoperative assessment of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains difficult and variable. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a validated medical record-based assessment of frailty that has been used to predict clinical outcomes for patients undergoing surgical procedures including CEA. We applied RAI to a veteran population following CEA for asymptomatic cerebrovascular disease and examined the factors related to post-operative morbidity and mortality.After obtaining IRB approval, Veteran Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program data was queried for CEA procedures from 2002 to 2015 for ICD-9 codes indicating asymptomatic patients. RAI was then calculated based on Veteran Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program variable medical record extraction. Three groupings of patients were undertaken including non-frail (RAI30), frail (RAI 30-34) and very frail (RAI ≥ 35). Chi squared and ANOVA were used to assess cohort differences. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of post-operative stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), any complication, and death.Between 2002 and 2015, 37,873 asymptomatic patients underwent CEA. Over 98% (37,266) of the patients were male with an average age of 68.3 ± 8.55 years. The cohorts contained 82.8% (n = 31,362), 12.4% (n = 4,678), and 4.8% (n = 1,833) for the non-frail, frail and very frail groups respectively. Frailty was associated with increased rates of post-operative stroke, MI, any complication, death, and longer hospital length of stay (P0.001). Operative time did not significantly differ between the groups. Increasing frailty was associated with having one or more complications (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.50-1.90 for frail and OR 2.79, 95% CI 2.41-3.24 for very frail, (P0.001), post-operative stroke in frail (OR 1.33 95% CI 1.06-1.67) and very frail (OR 1.57 1 95% CI 1.14-2.16) patients, and MI in both frail (OR 1.68, CI 1.17-2.43) and very frail (OR 3.73, CI 2.52-5.51) patients. Frailty was also significantly associated with death with in very frail patients (OR 4.14, 95% CI 3.00-5.71, P0.001).Increasing frailty as determined by RAI was associated with worse post-operative outcomes in asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA. Higher RAI score cohorts were associated with higher rates of postoperative stroke, MI, complications, and death. We recommend the use of this frailty index as a screening tool to guide risk discussions with asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA.

INTRODUCTION Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) creation is the preferred first line hemodialysis access procedure. Analysis of diabetic rat arteriovenous fistula model indicates improved vascular function with HMG-CoA-Reductase Inhibitor (statin) use. We predict similar outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing primary RCAVF placement. METHODS A Veterans Administration Hospital dialysis access database over a fifteen-year period was queried identifying all RCAVF placements in diabetic patients. Patients were stratified into statin medication usage or not at RCAVF creation. Outcomes examined include rate of successful cannulation, functional patency duration, interventions per access, and rates of access thrombosis. Thrombosis-free survival of cannulated RCAVFs were compared using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank analysis followed by univariate, stepwise logistic regression and ROC curve analysis. RESULTS Total number of 123 RCAVF cases were performed in 122 diabetic male patients. At the time of RCAVF placement, 92 cases were performed on patients that were taking statin medication and 31 cases were performed on patients that were not taking statin medication. There was no difference in terms of rate of successful cannulation, functional patency duration, and number of interventions per access between the statin and non-statin groups. However, rate of RCAVF thrombosis once accessed was significantly lower in the statin group compared to the non-statin group (p=0.0005). Kaplan-Meier survival curve for each group were compared using log-rank test to reveal that diabetic patients who were on statin therapy at the time of operation had significantly higher access survival over time against thrombosis once it was cannulated for dialysis treatment compared to those who were not on statin therapy (p=0.0003). Univariate, stepwise logistic regression model indicated statin use as the only significant factor associated with lack of thrombosis (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS Statins appear to have protective effects against RCAVF thrombosis as predicted in animal models for diabetic patients undergoing primary RCAVF placements. There were similar functional outcomes in terms of rate of successful cannulation, functional patency duration, and number of interventions per access. These data should encourage further investigation of statins and their role in hemodialysis access.

Background The proximal radial artery fistula (PRA) has been established as an early viable surgical option for arteriovenous fistula creation. The overall assisted primary patency reported in the literature approaches 100% at 1 year. We hypothesize that this excellent patency does not represent a functional result when seen in light of successful cannulation and fistula utilization. Methods We retrospectively queried our Veterans Administration Hospital operative database to identify 284 male patients who had 571 access procedures performed by a senior vascular surgeon attending (R.K.D.) from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2008. Operative details, patient comorbidities, fistula maturation time (time to first cannulation), functional patency (date of access to abandonment, revision to another fistula type, conversion to a prosthetic graft, thrombosis of the fistula, conversion to peritoneal dialysis, renal transplant, or patient death), and total duration (creation of the fistula to the end of its functional patency) were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 144 PRAs were placed during the study period. In all, 87 patients underwent primary proximal radial artery fistula (P-PRA) placement in a limb without previous access; 57 patients had a secondary proximal radial artery fistula (S-PRA) after a failed previous fistula or graft in the same limb. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, comorbidities, and operative details. A total of 91 patients (63.2%) were receiving hemodialysis at the time of P-PRA or S-PRA placement. Outcomes of P-PRA and S-PRA populations on hemodialysis were examined. There was increased cannulation success (33% vs. 55%; P = 0.00354, Fisher's exact test), functional patency (755.2 ± 661.2 days vs. 405.4 ± 531.9 days; P = 0.0220, Wilcoxon two-sample test), and total duration (859.5 ± 650.7 days vs. 516.8 ± 547.2 days; P = 0.0361, Wilcoxon two-sample test) of S-PRA over P-PRA. There was no difference in endovascular interventions between the 2 groups (1.6 ± 1.0 interventions per access versus 1.1 ± 0.7 interventions per access; P = 0.2109, Wilcoxon two-sample test). Subgroup analysis (analysis of variance) of the S-PRA group indicated that a patent but failing previous access in the same arm was not superior in terms of successful cannulation, functional patency, or total duration when compared with a thrombosed previous access. Conclusions The PRA remains a viable first access procedure undertaken at our institution. Compared with the reported 12-month assisted primary patency of this fistula type, we found a small percentage of PRAs actually being accessed for successful hemodialysis treatment. The S-PRA appears to have a significantly higher successful cannulation rate, functional patency, and total duration time when compared with the P-PRA in patients receiving hemodialysis treatments. The mechanism of these improved outcomes is not known; considering patency or thrombosis of a previous access in the S-PRA group did not predict future access success in the same extremity.

"Seat belt syndrome" was first described by Garret and Braunstein in 1962. The syndrome involves skin and abdominal wall ecchymosis (seat belt sign) intra-abdominal solid organ and visceral injuries, as well as Chance fractures (compression and/or wedging deformity of the anterior portion of the vertebral body with disruption or fracture of the posterior elements, generally at L1-L3). We present a case of a 12-year-old male involved in a high-speed motor vehicle collision wearing only a lap belt resulting in seat belt syndrome, with disruption of the abdominal wall, mesenteric avulsion with multiple intestinal perforations, abdominal aortic dissection, and an L2 Chance fracture with cord transection. Intraoperative decision making is outlined with this scenario of complex injuries, and the literature of seat belt syndrome associated with blunt aortic injuries and its management is reviewed.