Search

Forty-six previously untreated patients with advanced breast cancer were eligible for the present randomised phase I study. It aimed to evaluate the toxicity and activity of a therapeutic sequence with epirubicin on day 1 followed by paclitaxel on day 2 (sequence A) or the reverse sequence, ie., paclitaxel on day 1 followed by epirubicin on day 2 (sequence B). The starting doses of epirubicin and paclitaxel, administered either according to sequence A or B, (level 1 cohort) were 90 mg/m2 and 175 mg/m2, respectively. Per cohort of 3 patients, the dose of paclitaxel was increased by 25 mg/m2 (levels 2 and 4) and of epirubicin by 10 mg/m2 (levels 3 and 5). Treatment was repeated with 3-week intervals. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved at level 1 in sequence B (paclitaxel first) and level 3 (epirubicin 100 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel 200 mg m2) in sequence A. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia (+/- febrile) in both sequences. Cardiac events occurred in 28% of the patients; significant decrease in left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) was observed in 8/33 and in 2/13 patients in sequence A and B, respectively. This was associated with 5 and 1 cardiac heart failure (CHF), respectively. In 43 evaluable patients, 10 CR and 25 PR were observed (overall response rate 81%). In the 20 patients with locally advanced disease (LABC), the respective numbers were 7 CR and 11 PR; in the 23 metastatic (MBC) patients, 3 CR and 14 PR were recorded. The median survival of the both groups was not reached at 33 + months. In conclusion , the combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel has significant activity in breast cancer. The recommended sequence of both drugs in combination therapy, mainly to avoid neutropenia, is epirubicin day 1 followed by paclitaxel on day 2. Cardiac toxicity remains problematic in either sequence of administration.

366 patients fully resected from a Dukes B2 or C colorectal cancer were randomised to receive 6 courses of systemic chemotherapy comprising either 5-fluorouracil (5 FU) alone (arm A: 450 mg/m2/day-5/21 days) or combined folinic acid (FOL) and 5 FU (arm B: respectively 200 mg/m2 racemic form or 100 mg/m2-l-form and 370 mg/m2/day-5/21 days). 173 patients had also been initially randomised to receive one course of intraportal chemotherapy just after surgery or no portal treatment. Oral levamisole (150 mg/day; 3 days every other week) was given to all patients for one year. A significantly higher incidence of leuco-granulocytopenia was observed in the arm A (5 FU alone) inducing more frequent dose delays and adaptations as well as levamisole's withdrawal. Then dose-intensities and dose-intensity products were lower in this arm but the dose intensity expressed in mg/m2/week remained higher (631 +/- 107 vs 557 +/- 99; p0.001). The median follow-up in the study was 4.5 years. Relapse free (RFS) and overall survivals (OAS) were prolonged in the 5 FU alone group peculiarly in those patients who had not been randomised for portal treatment. Curves diverged progressively with longer follows-up (at 8 years; RFS in arm A: 67-71% vs 59-53% in arm B; OAS in arm A: 72-74% vs 56-46% in arm B). Patients suffering from a colon or a Dukes C cancer benefited the most from the treatment with 5 FU alone. The results are discussed in the light of other recent adjuvant trials. Well dosed 5 FU over a short period of time without folinic acid may be a valuable and inexpensive adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer. Levamisole may no longer be recommended in this setting.