Search

Aim: To evaluate survival outcomes of patients in pStage II-III rectal cancer treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based radiochemotherapy and to retrospectively analyze the impact of prognostic variables on local control, metastasis-free survival and cause-specific survival., Patients and Methods: A total of 1,338 patients, treated between 1985-2005 for locally advanced rectal cancer, who underwent surgery and postoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation, were selected., Results: The actuarial 5- and 10-year outcomes were: local control 87.0%-84.1%, disease-free survival 61.6%-52.1%, metastasis-free survival 72.0%-67.2%, cause-specific survival 70.4%-57.5%, and overall survival 63.8%-53.4%. Better outcomes were observed in patients with IIA, IIIA stage. Multivariate analyses showed that variables significantly affecting metastasis-free survival were pT4 and pN2, while for cancer-specific survival those variables were age >65 years, pT4, pN1, pN2, distal tumors and number of lymph nodes removed ≤ 12., Conclusion: This study confirmed that among stage II-III rectal cancer patients there are subgroups of patients with different clinical outcomes.

We report on clinical features of 113 cases of pathologically confirmed Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, observed in Genoa (Italy) between 1979 and 1985. Overall median survival was 10 months. Among the pretreatment variables studied (age, sex, asbestos exposure, pathological type, chest pain and dyspnea at the time of diagnosis), the only one of prognostic value in the univariate analysis was the histological subtype: median survivals were 12, 7 and 4 months for the patients in the epithelial, mixed, and fibrosarcomatous groups, respectively (p = 0.0012). A multivariate analysis confirmed the independent predictive power of the histotype (p = 0.0022). A review of literature data concerning prognostic factors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma is presented.

Both CAV (Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine) and PE (Cisplatin, Etoposide) are effective and non cross-resistant regimens in the treatment of SCLC. We designed a chemotherapeutic scheme including CAV and PE given in an alternating fashion with the following schedule: Cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/sm, Doxorubicin 50 mg/sm, Vincristine 2 mg/sm I.V. on day 1, alternated every 21 days with Cisplatin 20 mg/sm and Etoposide 80 mg/sm I.V. days 1-5 for 6 cycles. Following chemotherapy (CT) chest radiotherapy in patients (pts) with limited disease (LD) in complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in CRs were given, 32 pts entered the study and 27 were evaluable: 9/27 (33.3%) had CR (8/15 with LD had CR) and 15/27 (55.5%) PR. The overall median survival was 53.71 weeks: 79.85 weeks for LD pts and 32.86 for ED.4 pts with LD were alive after 2 years and 2 of them are still alive without disease at 44 and 46 months. Toxicity was acceptable in all patients. Alternating chemotherapy with CAV and PE followed by chest and brain RT in responding LD pts is an effective induction treatment for SCLC although long-term survival still remains disappointing.

Sixteen patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer, unsuitable for standard aggressive intravenous chemotherapy due to advanced age or poor performance status or very advanced disease including brain metastases or either extensive liver or marrow involvement with impaired organ function, were treated with combined oral chemotherapy including 4-demethoxydaunorubicin (IMI30, idarubicin) 30 mg/sm on day 1 and etoposide (VP16) 150 mg/sm on days 2,3,4 every 4 weeks. Out of 13 evaluable patients 1 had a complete response and 2 had a partial response with an overall objective response rate of 23% (95% confidence-limits 5-53.8%). Toxicity was generally very mild. Although the compliance of this regimen is excellent, its antitumor activity seems unsatisfactory even in this category of poor-risk small-cell lung cancer patients.