Search

We examined the susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi to antimicrobial peptides likely to be encountered in vivo during human infection. H. ducreyi was significantly more resistant than Escherichia coli to the bactericidal effects of all peptides tested. Class I and II H. ducreyi strains exhibited similar levels of resistance to antimicrobial peptides.

The in vitro susceptibilities of 112 clinical isolates of Haemophilus ducreyi to six antimicrobial agents were determined. These isolates were obtained in Kigali, Rwanda, during three studies on genital ulcer disease performed in 1986 (18 isolates), 1988 (23 isolates), and 1991 (71 isolates). All H. ducreyi isolates were susceptible to azithromycin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and erythromycin; all isolates obtained in 1986 were also susceptible to trimethoprim and to the combination trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In contrast, 39 and 9% of the isolates obtained in 1988 and 59 and 48% of the isolates obtained in 1991 were resistant to trimethoprim (MIC, > or = 4.0 mg/liter) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (MIC, < or = 4.0/76 mg/liter), respectively. These data indicate that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole can no longer be recommended for use in the treatment of chancroid in Rwanda, and possibly elsewhere in Africa.

The in vitro susceptibilities to various antimicrobial agents of 100 strains of beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus ducreyi recently isolated from patients in New Orleans, La., were determined by an agar dilution method. All strains were highly susceptible to ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, azithromycin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and sparfloxacin. beta-Lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations were less active, but all strains were susceptible to them. Doxycycline exhibited the poorest activity, and the rate of resistance to doxycycline varied depending on the time after inoculation that the MIC was determined.

We determined the in vitro susceptibilities of 54 isolates of Haemophilus ducreyi from Thailand (29 isolates) and San Francisco (25 isolates) to penicillin G, tetracycline, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, cefixime, erythromycin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Isolates were susceptible to < or = 0.25 microgram of ceftriaxone per ml, < or less 0.5 microgram of cefixime per ml, < or = 0.125 microgram of ciprofloxacin per ml, and < or = 0.06 microgram of ofloxacin per ml. Erythromycin was active against all isolates (MIC for 90% of isolates tested, 0.25 microgram/ml), as was azithromycin (MIC, < or = micrograms/ml). In contrast, all but one isolate were resistant to > or = 8.0 micrograms of tetracycline per ml, 11.1% of the isolates were resistant to and 40.9% of the isolates were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (MIC, > or = 4/76 microgram/ml.)

We determined the susceptibilities of 94 strains of Haemophilus ducreyi isolated in various municipalities in the United States between 1982 and 1989 to the following antimicrobial agents: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, trimethoprim, and spectinomycin. Ceftriaxone (MIC, less than or equal to 0.008 micrograms/ml), azithromycin (MIC, less than or equal to 0.125 micrograms/ml), erythromycin (MIC, less than or equal to 0.125 micrograms/ml), ciprofloxacin (MIC, less than or equal to 0.25 micrograms/ml), and ofloxacin (MIC, less than or equal to 0.25 micrograms/ml) were highly active against all isolates. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (MICs, 0.25 to 8.0 micrograms/ml), trimethoprim (MICs, 0.06 to 16.0 micrograms/ml), and spectinomycin (MICs, 2.0 to greater than or equal to 32.0 micrograms/ml) were less active against these isolates. Isolates possessing the 5.7-MDa beta-lactamase plasmid were less susceptible to erythromycin, trimethoprim, and spectinomycin than were isolates possessing the 3.2-MDa beta-lactamase plasmid. The susceptibilities of plasmidless isolates to erythromycin, trimethoprim, and spectinomycin were distributed bimodally; the median MIC for the more susceptible plasmidless isolates corresponded to that for isolates with the 3.2-MDa plasmid, and the median MIC for the less susceptible plasmidless isolates corresponded to that for isolates with the 5.7-MDa plasmid. Thus, plasmid profiles may be valuable markers for geographical variations in antimicrobial susceptibilities of H. ducreyi strains that may indicate the relative efficacy of regimens for the treatment of chancroid. Of the regimens recommended by the U.S. Public Health Service for the treatment of chancroid, our results support the use of erythromycin, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin, and perhaps ofloxacin, but suggest that amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim should be used with caution.

One hundred seven men with Haemophilus ducreyi-positive chancroid were assigned to receive 300 mg of rosoxacin as a single dose or 150 mg twice daily for 3 days. Ulcers and buboes were followed clinically and bacteriologically for 1 month. Of 40 evaluable males on the 3-day regimen, 38 (95%) were cured, while only 14 of 23 (61%) males on the single-dose regimen were cured; this regimen was discontinued. There was one ulcer relapse at day 21 in both groups; the one relapse in the single-dose group had a persistent culture-positive bubo. Eight of nine (89%) buboes followed to the endpoint on the 3-day rosoxacin regimen were cured, versus three of six (50%) on the single-dose regimen. Adverse effects were mainly related to the central nervous system but were minor and did not require intervention. None of the treatment failures was due to organisms resistant to rosoxacin, and failure of the single-dose regimen presumably was related to duration of tissue levels rather than to drug resistance. Administration of 150 mg of rosoxacin twice daily for 3 days is an effective regimen for the therapy of chancroid and is a reasonable alternative to other short-course regimens.

Chancroid is gaining importance as a sexually transmitted disease because of its association with transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Effective, simply administered therapy for chancroid is necessary. Fleroxacin is effective against Haemophilus ducreyi in vitro. We performed an initial randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of fleroxacin for treatment of chancroid in Nairobi, Kenya. Fifty-three men with culture-positive chancroid were randomly assigned to receive either 200 mg (group 1) or 400 mg (group 2) of fleroxacin as a single oral dose. Groups 1 and 2 were similar with regard to severity of disease, bubo formation, and HIV-1 status. A satisfactory clinical response to therapy was noted in 23 of 26 patients (88%) in group 1 and 18 of 23 patients (78%) in group 2. Bacteriological failure occurred in 1 of 26 evaluable patients (4%) in group 1 and 4 of 23 evaluable patients (17%) in group 2. Two of 37 HIV-1-seronegative men (5%) and 3 of 11 HIV-1-infected men (27%) were bacteriological failures. Fleroxacin, 200 or 400 mg as a single oral dose, is efficacious therapy for microbiologically proven chancroid in patients who do not have concurrent HIV-1 infection. Among HIV-1-infected men, a single dose of 200 or 400 mg of fleroxacin is inadequate therapy for chancroid.

Seven of the 96 ampicillin-resistant isolates of Haemophilus ducreyi reported in the preceding article (Bilgeri et al., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22:686-688, 1982) were investigated and found to harbor plasmids of 3.95, 5.2, 5.8, and 6.4 megadaltons. All except the 5.8-megadalton plasmid have been shown to code for beta-lactamase. The 6.4- and 5.2-megadalton plasmids of three isolates were conjugally transferable to a streptomycin-resistant mutant of H. ducreyi at high frequencies, perhaps due to the presence in these strains of a high-molecular-weight plasmid.

Of 103 strains of Haemophilus ducreyi isolated in Johannesburg, 96 produced beta-lactamase and were resistant to penicillin and ampicillin. Most strains showed resistance to tetracycline, sulfisoxazole, and sulfamethoxazole. All isolates were susceptible to rifampin, erythromycin, and cefoxitin, moderately susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1:19) and minocycline, and somewhat less susceptible to doxycycline.