1. Novel method to assess antiretroviral target trough concentrations using in vitro susceptibility data.
- Author
-
Acosta EP, Limoli KL, Trinh L, Parkin NT, King JR, Weidler JM, Ofotokun I, and Petropoulos CJ
- Subjects
- Biological Assay, Blood Proteins chemistry, HIV Infections drug therapy, HIV Infections virology, HIV Integrase Inhibitors blood, HIV Integrase Inhibitors pharmacology, HIV Protease Inhibitors blood, HIV Protease Inhibitors pharmacology, HIV-1 growth & development, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Protein Binding, Regression Analysis, Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors blood, Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors pharmacology, HIV Integrase Inhibitors pharmacokinetics, HIV Protease Inhibitors pharmacokinetics, HIV-1 drug effects, Models, Statistical, Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors pharmacokinetics
- Abstract
Durable suppression of HIV-1 replication requires the establishment of antiretroviral drug concentrations that exceed the susceptibility of the virus strain(s) infecting the patient. Minimum plasma drug concentrations (C(trough)) are correlated with response, but determination of target C(trough) values is hindered by a paucity of in vivo concentration-response data. In the absence of these data, in vitro susceptibility measurements, adjusted for serum protein binding, can provide estimations of suppressive in vivo drug concentrations. We derived serum protein binding correction factors (PBCF) for protease inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and an integrase inhibitor by measuring the effect of a range of human serum concentrations on in vitro drug susceptibility measured with the PhenoSense HIV assay. PBCFs corresponding to 100% HS were extrapolated using linear regression and ranged from 1.4 for nevirapine to 77 for nelfinavir. Using the mean 95% inhibitory concentration (IC(95)) for ≥1,200 drug-susceptible viruses, we calculated protein-bound IC(95) (PBIC(95)) values. PBIC(95) values were concordant with the minimum effective C(trough) values that were established in well-designed pharmacodynamic studies (e.g., indinavir, saquinavir, and amprenavir). In other cases, the PBIC(95) values were notably lower (e.g., darunavir, efavirenz, and nevirapine) or higher (nelfinavir and etravirine) than existing target recommendations. The establishment of PBIC(95) values as described here provides a convenient and standardized approach for estimation of the minimum drug exposure that is required to maintain viral suppression and prevent the emergence of drug-resistant variants, particularly when in vivo concentration-response relationships are lacking.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF