17 results on '"Market share -- Cases"'
Search Results
2. Predatory pricing with a 12% market share: recoupment via tacit collusion in the cigarette oligopoly.
3. Entry, recoupment, and higher prices: irrelevance of high market shares in predatory pricing.
4. Court's final jury instructions in the cigarette oligopoly-predation case: competitive injury requires supracompetitive prices via 'market power.' (Liggett v. B & W Tobacco Corp.)
5. Defendant's proposed jury instructions: predation requires at least 28% market share.
6. Keys to predatory pricing: market power and recoupment via supracompetitive prices.
7. Defendant's proposed jury instructions: predation requires at least 28% market share.
8. Predatory pricing with a 12% market share: recoupment via tacit collusion in the cigarette oligopoly.
9. Predatory pricing requires 60% market share: no 'oligopoly' recoupment without firm 'market power.'
10. Entry, recoupment, and higher prices: irrelevance of high market shares in predatory pricing.
11. Predation and 'recoupment' in the Rose Acre killing fields: new U.S. model to the world.
12. The Rose Acre decision and below-cost price discrimination: spoiled economic eggs in the 7th Circuit.
13. Predatory intent, pricing below AVC, and oligopoly market power: usurping the jury's function.
14. Product differentiation and market definition: Sealy's submarket and the 30% higher price.
15. Intrabrand and interbrand competition in the 'brand' industries: the Sealy case II.
16. Bad economics in the 9th Circuit, Northern District of California.
17. End of the Chicago school's free ride on Sealy: the free-rider theory meets the facts of life.
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.