Search

Background Vitamin D (VitD) and calcium (Ca) supplementation attenuates antiretroviral therapy (ART)-associated bone loss, but it is unclear whether this effect is mediated through immunomodulation.Methods In this exploratory analysis of A5280, a 48-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of VitD/Ca supplementation with ART initiation, we characterized lymphocyte phenotypes and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) expression by median fluorescence intensity (MFI) at baseline and 48 weeks. Changes were evaluated within and between treatment groups by Wilcoxon signed rank and rank sum tests, respectively. Spearman correlations estimated relationships between cellular phenotypes and bone mineral density (BMD).Results Of 165 participants enrolled, 138 had samples for cellular phenotypes (64 VitD/Ca, 74 placebo). Markers of CD4, CD8 activation (CD38+HLA-DR+) declined (all P<0.001), but did not differ between arms. There was no decline in either %T-cells (CD4 and CD8) expressing RANKL or expression of RANKL by MFI. CD4 and CD8 activation markers were not correlated with BMD at baseline (r<0.15 and P>0.09 for all), but greater declines in CD4 activation correlated with greater declines in hip and spine BMD in both arms (0.25 =r =0.37, all P<0.05). A greater decline in CD8 activation was correlated with greater declines in both hip and spine BMD in the placebo arm only (hip r=0.31, P=0.009; spine r=0.25, P=0.035).Conclusions Reductions in T-cell activation are characteristic of ART initiation, but only correlated modestly with bone loss. VitD/Ca supplementation does not appear to mitigate bone loss through modulation of immune activation or expression of RANKL. Trial registration number: NCT01403051.

Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an emerging concern for HIV-infected patients. Hyperlipidaemia is a risk factor for CVD and a complication of protease-inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy, but little is known about its incidence and risk factors in treated patients in resource-limited settings (RLS).Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of ACTG A5230 trial in which HIV-infected adults from India, Malawi, Tanzania, Thailand and South Africa, with virological relapse on first-line therapy were initiated on lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy. Hyperlipidaemia was a grade 2+ elevated fasting total cholesterol (FTC=240 mg/dl) or fasting triglycerides (FTG=500 mg/dl) or calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL=160 mg/dl) based on measurements at weeks 12, 24, 48, 68 and 104. We evaluated factors potentially associated with quantitative lipid changes from baseline to week 12. These were age, sex, race, site and baseline body mass index, CD4+T-cell count, HIV-1 RNA level and lipids.Results 106 participants without hyperlipidaemia at baseline started LPV/r; median age 39 years, 68% Black African, 55% female. The cumulative incidence of hyperlipidaemia at week 104 was 48% (95% CI 36, 58%). At week 12, there were significant mean increases from baseline in FTC (17 mg/dl, P<0.001) and FTG (104 mg/dl, P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, higher baseline FTC (P=0.044), FTG (P=0.025), Thai (P<0.001) or Indian sites (P=0.020) versus African sites were associated with increased risk of hyperlipidaemia.Conclusions In HIV-infected adults in RLS initiating LPV/r, hyperlipidaemia was common. Baseline lipid measurements and routine monitoring should be recommended in individuals starting LPV/r-based treatments with borderline high lipids.

Background Homozygosity for UGT1A1*28/*28has been reported to be associated with atazanavir-associated hyperbilirubinaemia and premature atazanavir discontinuation. We assessed the potential cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1testing to inform the choice of an initial protease-inhibitor-containing regimen in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive individuals.Methods We used the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications computer simulation model to project quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs (2009 USD) for atazanavir-based ART with or without UGT1A1testing, using darunavir rather than atazanavir when indicated. We assumed the UGT1A1-associated atazanavir discontinuation rate reported in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (a *28/*28frequency of 14.9%), equal efficacy and cost of atazanavir and darunavir and a genetic assay cost of $107. These parameters, as well as the effect of hyperbilirubinaemia on quality of life and loss to follow up, were varied in sensitivity analyses. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually.Results Initiating atazanavir-based ART at CD4+T-cell counts <500 cells/µl without UGT1A1testing had an average discounted life expectancy of 16.02 QALYs and $475,800 discounted lifetime cost. Testing for UGT1A1increased QALYs by 0.49 per 10,000 patients tested and was not cost-effective (>$100,000/QALY). Testing for UGT1A1was cost-effective (<$100,000/QALY) if assay cost decreased to $10, or if avoiding hyperbilirubinaemia by UGT1A1testing reduced loss to follow-up by 5%. If atazanavir and darunavir differed in cost or efficacy, testing for UGT1A1was not cost-effective under any scenario.Conclusions Testing for UGT1A1may be cost-effective if assay cost is low and if testing improves retention in care, but only if the comparator ART regimens have the same drug cost and efficacy.

ACTG (AIDS Clinical Trials Group) A5095 was a double-blinded Phase III clinical trial designed to compare three simple strategies for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) combined with two nucleosides, a triple-nucleoside regimen, and an NNRTI combined with three nucleosides. The study was designed to provide a rigorous evaluation of the relative effectiveness of the three different treatment strategies in achieving and maintaining durable HIV-1 RNA suppression using both superiority and non-inferiority designs. At the same time, we sought to provide study participants with flexible treatment management options that closely reflected clinical care approaches available outside the setting of a clinical trial in this rapidly changing field of medicine. Fulfilling both of these goals required making decisions about the primary endpoint definition, blinding, treatment changes, and stopping guidelines for the primary efficacy hypotheses. In this paper we describe the study design decisions that were made, in the context of randomized HIV treatment trials in general. We hope that the discussion will inform the design of treatment strategy trials, both for HIV and for other diseases where clinical standards change rapidly. We also hope to inform the field regarding issues in choosing composite versus virological endpoints as well as other key considerations in trial design and monitoring.