Search

Background: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify potentially modifiable risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative colonization or infection in critically ill burn patients., Methods: A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Central (Cochrane). Risk factors including antibiotic use and hospital interventions were summarized in a random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of publication bias was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method and funnel plots., Results: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. We identified several potentially modifiable risk factors and were able to grade their importance based on effect size. Related to prior antibiotic exposure, extended-spectrum cephalosporins (pooled odds ratio (OR) 7.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.77-17.67), carbapenems (pooled OR 6.65, 95% CI 3.49-12.69), anti-pseudomonal penicillins (pooled OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.23-14.61) and aminoglycosides (pooled OR 4.20, 95% CI 2.10-8.39) were most significant. Related to hospital intervention, urinary catheters (pooled OR 11.76, 95% CI 5.03-27.51), arterial catheters (pooled OR 8.99, 95% CI 3.84-21.04), mechanical ventilation (pooled OR 5.49, 95% CI 2.59-11.63), central venous catheters (pooled OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.03-17.59), transfusion or blood product administration (pooled OR 4.19, 95% CI 1.48-11.89) and hydrotherapy (pooled OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.64-6.63) were most significant., Conclusion: Prior exposure to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems, as well as the use of urinary catheters and arterial catheters pose the greatest threat for infection or colonization with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms in the critically ill burn patient population., (© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Background: Infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative organisms leads to poorer outcomes in the critically ill burn patient. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for MDR Gram-negative pathogen infection in critically ill burn patients admitted to a major tertiary referral intensive care unit (ICU) in Australia., Methods: A retrospective case-control study of all adult burn patients admitted over a 7-year period was conducted. Twenty-one cases that cultured an MDR Gram-negative organism were matched with 21 controls of similar age, gender, burn size and ICU stay. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to individually assess risk factors after adjusting for Acute Burn Severity Index. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were reported. P-values < 0.25 were considered as potentially important risk factors., Results: Factors increasing the risk of MDR Gram-negative infection included superficial partial thickness burn size (OR: 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.16; P-value: 0.034), prior meropenem exposure (OR: 10.39; 95% CI: 0.96-112.00; P-value: 0.054), Gram-negative colonization on admission (OR: 9.23; 95% CI: 0.65-130.15; P-value: 0.10) and escharotomy (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 0.52-13.65; P-value: 0.24). For cases, mean age was 41 (SD: 13) years, mean total body surface area burned was 47% (SD: 18) and mean days in ICU until MDR specimen collection was 17 (SD: 10) days., Conclusion: Prior meropenem exposure, Gram-negative colonization on admission, escharotomy and superficial partial thickness burn size may be potentially important factors for increasing the risk of MDR Gram-negative infection in the critically ill burn patient., (© 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)