Search

Background Despite relatively few COVID‐19 cases within New South Wales, the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic has prevented a return to business as usual for the delivery of surgical services. This study aims to describe the evolving impact of COVID‐19 on surgical activity and patient outcomes at a major public tertiary referral hospital. Methods A retrospective cohort study involving adult surgical patients treated at a large public tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Surgical activity, surgical outcomes and patient demographics were compared across two time periods, including the ‘first wave’ (February–May 2020 vs. February–May 2019) and the ‘perseverance phase’ (June–September 2020 vs. June–September 2019). Variables across both groups were compared using an independent t test or chi‐squared test. Results A −32% reduction in surgical separations was observed in the ‘first wave’, including −20% emergency and −37% elective. In the ‘perseverance phase’, there was a −19% reduction in surgical activity, including 0% emergency and −27% elective. The average length of stay, intensive care admissions, postoperative complications and in‐hospital costs significantly increased in the ‘first wave’. The proportion of public patients increased marginally (3%) in the ‘first wave’. Conclusion The impact of COVID‐19 was most severely experienced in the initial months of the pandemic and observed in the number of patients treated. Although there was an initial effect on surgical outcomes, overall, the standard of care remained safe. The delivery of elective surgery remains a challenge and reflects the ongoing system‐wide changes that are required to manage the COVID‐19 pandemic., The ongoing uncertainty surrounding the COVID‐19 pandemic has prevented a return to business as usual for the delivery of surgical services. The impact of COVID‐19 was most severely experienced in the initial ‘first wave’ of the pandemic (February to May 2020) and observed in the number of surgical patients treated. There was an initial effect on patient outcomes, however, overall the standard of care remained comparable and safe. The delivery of elective surgery remains a challenge and reflects the ongoing system‐wide changes that are required to manage the COVID‐19 pandemic.

The evolving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic represents an unprecedented and largely unanticipated challenge to the delivery of surgical care in Australia and New Zealand. The first confirmed COVID‐19 case in Australia occurred on 25 January 2020. Since then, 2675 patients have been diagnosed nationally, resulting in 12 deaths (at the time of writing). New South Wales has been the most affected state based on case volume, with 1219 documented cases. During the initial response in New South Wales, all patients with confirmed COVID‐19 requiring hospitalization were managed at a nominated COVID‐19 centre (Westmead Hospital). As the pandemic evolved and the confirmed cases increased, a second COVID‐19 centre was established at Royal Prince Alfred (RPA) Hospital on 4 March 2020. RPA is a 900‐bed teaching hospital located in metropolitan Sydney, which provides surgical care for the local community but also serves as a quaternary referral centre for complex surgical services including advanced gastrointestinal malignancy, complex cardiovascular and neurosurgery, and renal and liver transplantation. As the third week of the response period at RPA comes to an end, this article aims to share our initial experience as a dedicated COVID‐19 centre by describing the issues faced in providing acute and elective surgical care, the broad impacts on staff and the early strategies adopted to address these challenges.

Background People with comorbid mental illness have poorer health status and disparate access to healthcare. Several studies internationally have reported mixed findings regarding the association between mental illness and surgical patient outcomes. This study examines the surgical outcomes in people with decompensated serious mental illness (SMI) within the setting of the Australian universal healthcare system. Methods Retrospective cohort study involving elective overnight surgical patients aged 18 years and above who attended a large public tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia, between 2010 and 2014. Patients were identified using ICD-10-AM diagnosis codes. Outcomes measure including in-hospital mortality, post-operative complications, morbidity, admission and time in intensive care, length and cost of hospitalization, discharge destination and 28-day re-admission rates were examined. Results Of 23 343 surgical patient admissions, 451 (2%) patients had decompensated comorbid SMI with a subset of 47 (0.2%) having a specific psychotic illness. Patients with SMI comorbidity had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (2% versus 0%), post-operative complications (22% versus 8%), total comorbidity (7.6 versus 3.4 secondary codes), admissions (29% versus 9%) and time in intensive care (34.6 h versus 5.0 h), stay in hospital (12.2 days versus 4.6 days), admission costs ($24 162 versus $12 336), re-admission within 28 days (14% versus 10%) and discharges to another facility (11% versus 3%). Conclusion Patients with comorbid SMI had significantly worse surgical outcomes and incur much higher costs compared with the general surgical population. These results strongly highlight that specific perioperative interventions are needed to proactively improve the identification, management and outcomes for these disadvantaged patients.

Distributive justice refers to the fair and appropriate distribution of benefits, risks and costs within a society. In a medical context, this requires patients with similar cases to be treated in a similar manner, and for there to be overarching equality of access to finite health resources. Distributive justice is a derivative of the broader principle of justice, which is one of the four biomedical ethics pillars described by Beauchamp and Childress as underpinning modern medical practice, along with beneficence, non‐maleficence and autonomy.1 The concept of distributive justice as it relates to the delivery of surgical care requires attention in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Significant measures have been taken by our governments, health ministries and public and private hospitals in an effort to prepare the Australian healthcare system for high volumes of patients with COVID‐19. In the Australian context where a relatively low societal burden of disease has emerged, a question arises about the opportunity cost of these unprecedented interventions and restrictions, which have resulted in significant disruptions to the delivery of emergency and elective medical treatment – are we upholding the principle of distributive justice during the present pandemic?

BACKGROUND To undertake a comprehensive needs assessment to determine the baseline of surgical research activity at a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. METHOD The comprehensive needs assessment comprised three components: a retrospective audit of the hospital ethics committee records to identify surgical research activity; a survey of all 17 surgical departments about the availability of 10 potential research resources and a survey of surgical staff to ascertain perceptions of research culture at the organizational, team and individual levels. RESULTS Of all research studies submitted to the hospital ethics committee in a 2-year period, only 9% were identified as surgical studies. Among the 17 surgical departments, there was wide variation in activity with only four defined as being 'research active'. On average, 52% of potential resources for surgical research were found to be in place within surgical departments. Only five departments were considered to be adequately research resourced (≥75% potential resources in place). Surgical research culture was rated 'moderate' at the organizational and team level, and 'low' at the individual level. Medical staff rated research capacity significantly higher at the team and individual levels compared to nursing staff. CONCLUSION Collectively, the baseline results indicate there is considerable opportunity to enhance surgical research at the hospital level and to use this information to guide new and innovative approaches in the future.

People with comorbid mental illness have poorer health status and disparate access to healthcare. Several studies internationally have reported mixed findings regarding the association between mental illness and surgical patient outcomes. This study examines the surgical outcomes in people with decompensated serious mental illness (SMI) within the setting of the Australian universal healthcare system.Retrospective cohort study involving elective overnight surgical patients aged 18 years and above who attended a large public tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia, between 2010 and 2014. Patients were identified using ICD-10-AM diagnosis codes. Outcomes measure including in-hospital mortality, post-operative complications, morbidity, admission and time in intensive care, length and cost of hospitalization, discharge destination and 28-day re-admission rates were examined.Of 23 343 surgical patient admissions, 451 (2%) patients had decompensated comorbid SMI with a subset of 47 (0.2%) having a specific psychotic illness. Patients with SMI comorbidity had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (2% versus 0%), post-operative complications (22% versus 8%), total comorbidity (7.6 versus 3.4 secondary codes), admissions (29% versus 9%) and time in intensive care (34.6 h versus 5.0 h), stay in hospital (12.2 days versus 4.6 days), admission costs ($24 162 versus $12 336), re-admission within 28 days (14% versus 10%) and discharges to another facility (11% versus 3%).Patients with comorbid SMI had significantly worse surgical outcomes and incur much higher costs compared with the general surgical population. These results strongly highlight that specific perioperative interventions are needed to proactively improve the identification, management and outcomes for these disadvantaged patients.

To undertake a comprehensive needs assessment to determine the baseline of surgical research activity at a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia.The comprehensive needs assessment comprised three components: a retrospective audit of the hospital ethics committee records to identify surgical research activity; a survey of all 17 surgical departments about the availability of 10 potential research resources and a survey of surgical staff to ascertain perceptions of research culture at the organizational, team and individual levels.Of all research studies submitted to the hospital ethics committee in a 2-year period, only 9% were identified as surgical studies. Among the 17 surgical departments, there was wide variation in activity with only four defined as being 'research active'. On average, 52% of potential resources for surgical research were found to be in place within surgical departments. Only five departments were considered to be adequately research resourced (≥75% potential resources in place). Surgical research culture was rated 'moderate' at the organizational and team level, and 'low' at the individual level. Medical staff rated research capacity significantly higher at the team and individual levels compared to nursing staff.Collectively, the baseline results indicate there is considerable opportunity to enhance surgical research at the hospital level and to use this information to guide new and innovative approaches in the future.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the relative effect of elderly patients and increasing injury severity on acute hospital costs and inpatient length of stay. METHODS: A prospective study of all trauma team activations at a single inner city trauma centre was conducted over a 1-year period. Costs were imputed using Australian Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups. Costs and inpatient length of stays were compared between elderly (age ≥65 years) and non-elderly patients. Relative effects of increasing injury severity score (ISS) and age categories were modelled using generalized linear regression. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1096 consecutive patients were studied. Falls were the most common mechanism and contributed the highest proportion of aggregate costs. There was a moderately high correlation between cost and ISS (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.65, P Language: en