Search

Dispersing small amounts of solid nano particles into base-fluid has a significant impact on the thermo-physical properties of the base-fluid. These properties are utilized for effective capture and transportation of solar energy. This paper attempts key idea for harvesting solar energy by using alumina nanofluid in concentrating parabolic trough collectors. An experimental study is carried out to investigate the performance of a parabolic trough collector using Al2O3-H2O based nanofluid. Results clearly indicate that at same ambient, inlet temperatures, flow rate, concentration ratio etc. hike in thermal efficiency is around 5-10 % compared to the conventional Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC). Further, the effect of various parameters such as concentration ratio, receiver length, fluid velocity, volume fraction of nano particles has been studied. The different flow rates employed in the experiment are 2 ml/s, 4 ml/s and 6 ml/s. Volumetric concentration of 0.02%, 0.04% and 0.06% has been studied in the experiment. Surfactants are not introduced to avoid bubble formation. Tracking mode of parabolic trough collector is manual. Results also reveal that Al2O3-H2O based nanofluid has higher efficiency at higher flow rates.

The purpose of thermal energy storage systems (TES) is to store the heat energy supplied to it for a considerable time period and give the energy back when ever need arise. On many of occasions, part of the heat energy of various systems is unutilized. If this excess heat energy be stored in such systems as TESS, utilization of energy improves. If the use of such systems is widespread, fuel is conserved and national economy is saved.Different materials can be used in TESS to store heat energy and in the present work two such materials, which are popular phase change materials (PCM) namely (a) Paraffin (b) Stearic acid are used and subsequently the performance of the TESS is studied. The PCMs are used in the form of spherical capsules made up of high density poly ethylene (HDPE) of diameter 58 mm. Charging time and amount of heat energy recovered are studied for the two PCMs mentioned above and compared. Though paraffin as PCM gives little better heat energy recovery, performance of both the materials are almost the same. Hence as the cost of stearic acid is less when compared to paraffin on economical grounds and on ease of availability basis stearic acid has advantages over paraffin.