1. The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.
- Author
-
Vanderwee K, Grypdonck MH, De Bacquer D, and Defloor T
- Subjects
- Adult, Clinical Competence standards, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Erythema classification, Erythema etiology, Female, Heel, Hip, Humans, Inservice Training, Male, Mass Screening methods, Mass Screening standards, Middle Aged, Nursing Assessment standards, Nursing Evaluation Research, Nursing Staff, Hospital education, Nursing Staff, Hospital standards, Observation methods, Observer Variation, Palpation instrumentation, Palpation nursing, Palpation standards, Predictive Value of Tests, Pressure Ulcer classification, Pressure Ulcer complications, Risk Assessment, Sacrum, Severity of Illness Index, Erythema diagnosis, Nursing Assessment methods, Palpation methods, Pressure Ulcer diagnosis
- Abstract
Accurate identification of nonblanchable erythema (NBE) is essential in pressure ulcer prevention. This descriptive study assessed interrater reliability between a researcher and trained nurses in observing blanchable erythema and NBE and examined the predictive validity and level of agreement between two observation methods for NBE. Findings suggest that the transparent disk method should be preferred to the finger method. The interrater reliability between the researcher and the nurses was substantial and was higher for the observations at the sacrum than for those at the heels. Educational level and years of nursing experience did not seem to influence interrater reliability.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF