Search

The importance of highly monitored and analyzed processes, linked by information systems such as knowledge graphs, is growing. In addition, the integration of operators has become urgent due to their high costs and from a social point of view. An appropriate framework for implementing the Industry 5.0 approach requires effective data exchange in a highly complex manufacturing network to utilize resources and information. Furthermore, the continuous development of collaboration between human and machine actors is fundamental for industrial cyber-physical systems, as the workforce is one of the most agile and flexible manufacturing resources. This paper introduces the human-centric knowledge graph framework by adapting ontologies and standards to model the operator-related factors such as monitoring movements, working conditions, or collaborating with robots. It also presents graph-based data querying, visualization, and analysis through an industrial case study. The main contribution of this work is a knowledge graph-based framework that focuses on the work performed by the operator, including the evaluation of movements, collaboration with machines, ergonomics, and other conditions. In addition, the use of the framework is demonstrated in a complex use case based on an assembly line, with examples of resource allocation and comprehensive support in terms of the collaboration aspect between shop-floor workers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following the spread of the Industry 4.0 paradigm, the role of digital technologies in manufacturing, especially in production and industrial logistics processes, has become increasingly pivotal. Although the push towards digitalization and processes interconnection can bring substantial benefits, it may also increase the complexity of processes in terms of integration and management. To fully exploit the potential of technology, companies are required to develop an in-depth knowledge of each operational activity and related human aspects in the contexts where technology solutions can be implemented. Indeed, analyzing the impacts of technology on human work is key to promoting human-centred smart manufacturing and logistics processes. Therefore, this paper aims at increasing and systematizing knowledge about technologies supporting internal logistics working activities The main contribution of this paper is a taxonomy of the technologies that may be implemented in the different internal logistics areas to support a Logistics 4.0 model. Such a contribution is elaborated in accordance with a deductive approach (i.e., reasoning from the particular to the general), and backed up by an analysis of the literature. The taxonomy represents a useful framework to understand the current and possible technological implementations to drive logistics processes towards Logistics 4.0, with specific attention to the relation between human operators and technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Factory shop floor workers are exposed to threats and accidents due to their encounters with tools, equipment, and toxic materials. There are cases of occupational accidents resulting in injuries to workers and precipitating lawsuits, which on the other hand affect company's operational cost. To ensure the safety of workers within the shop floor, there is a need for proactive activity monitoring. Such activities include detection of falling objects, abnormal vibration, and movement of humans within an acceptable area of the factory floor. Breathing sensor-based monitoring of workers in the smart factory shop floor can also be implemented. This is for the detection of human activity, especially in cases where workers are in isolation with no available emergency assistance. Internet of Things (IoT), Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and machine learning (ML) have enabled so many possibilities in this area. In this study, we present a simple test-bed, which is made up of a vibration sensor, a breathing and movement sensor, and a Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensor. These sensors were used to gather normal and abnormal data of human activities at the factory. We developed a dataset based on possible real-life situations and it is made up of about 10,000 data points. The data was split with a ratio of 75:25 for training and testing the model. We investigated the performance of different ML algorithms, including support vector machine (SVM), linear regression, naive Bayes (NB), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and convolutional neural network (CNN). From our experiments, the CNN model outperformed other algorithms with an accuracy of 99.45%, 99.78%,100%, and 100%, respectively, for vibration, movement, breathing, and distance. We have also successfully developed a dataset to assist the research community in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a demand context of mass customization, shifting towards the mass personalization of products, assembly operations face the trade-off between highly productive automated systems and flexible manual operators. Novel digital technologies—conceptualized as Industry 4.0—suggest the possibility of simultaneously achieving superior productivity and flexibility. This article aims to address how Industry 4.0 technologies could improve the productivity, flexibility and quality of assembly operations. A systematic literature review was carried out, including 234 peer-reviewed articles from 2010–2020. As a result, the analysis was structured addressing four sets of research questions regarding (1) assembly for mass customization; (2) Industry 4.0 and performance evaluation; (3) Lean production as a starting point for smart factories, and (4) the implications of Industry 4.0 for people in assembly operations. It was found that mass customization brings great complexity that needs to be addressed at different levels from a holistic point of view; that Industry 4.0 offers powerful tools to achieve superior productivity and flexibility in assembly; that Lean is a great starting point for implementing such changes; and that people need to be considered central to Assembly 4.0. Developing methodologies for implementing Industry 4.0 to achieve specific business goals remains an open research topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]