Search

Aim : To assess the diagnostic performance of a simplified lung point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to confirm the correct positioning of an endotracheal tube (ETT) in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) used to chest radiography (CXR), and to compare the time to obtain the ETT position between POCUS and CXR. Methods : We conducted a single-center prospective study in critically ill children requiring urgent endotracheal intubation. Esophageal tube malposition was first avoided using auscultation and end-tidal CO2. The ETT position was assessed with CXR and lung POCUS using the lung sliding sign on a pleural window. All of the investigators had to read guidelines and received 1-h training on the technical aspects of lung sliding. The primary objective was the accuracy of POCUS in confirming correct nonselective endotracheal intubation as compared with CXR. Results : A total of 71 patients were included from December 2016 to November 2018. CXR identified proper nonselective ETT placement in 43 of 71 (61%) patients, while the rate for selective intubation was 39%. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS as compared with CXR were 77% and 68%, respectively. Median time to POCUS was significantly shorter than CXR (2 min to perform POCUS, 10 min to obtain radiographs, p Conclusion : Pleural ultrasound, although faster than CXR, appears to be inadequate for identifying selective ETT after urgent intubation in a PICU less accustomed to this kind of ultrasound. In this heterogeneous and fragile population, timely POCUS may remain useful at the bedside as compared with auscultation, aiming at guiding optimal ETT placement and reducing respiratory complications, provided by trained physicians.