Search

Purpose: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare heritable heterogenous disorder characterized by bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures with a wide spectrum of clinical expression due to defects in collagen type I biosynthesis. The purpose of the review is to highlight the practical norms in pregnancies with osteogenesis imperfecta., Methods: We carried out a literature review in MEDLINE on OI during pregnancy, focusing on diagnosis, therapy and delivery. We reviewed 28 articles (case reports, original articles and reviews)., Results: Pregnant women affected by type I OI should be closely monitored to assess fetal well-being and detect pregnancy-related complications associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis, restrictive pulmonary disease, cephalopelvic disproportion and other problems related to connective tissue disorders. Mode of delivery remains controversial and should be determined on an individual basis., Conclusion: In conclusion, women affected by type I OI represent a subset of patients whose pregnancies should be considered high risk and warrant a multidisciplinary approach in a referral center.

Purpose: Restoring the anatomical relationship and preserving the function of pelvic organs represent the ideal outcome of surgical intervention in patients suffering from endometriosis-related infertility. The aim of the study was to compare two large cohorts (Group A and Group B) of infertile patients in terms of postsurgical spontaneous/assisted fertility and perioperative surgical outcomes. The surgical treatment was performed by a skilled surgeon (Group A) and a surgeon dedicated to endometriosis-related infertility (Group B)., Methods: An observational cohort study on women affected by pelvic endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic treatment (to restore/improve their fertility) was conducted. A comparison, between Group A and Group B, in terms of perioperative surgical outcomes, clinical/ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates, spontaneous pregnancy rate and obstetrical outcome was performed., Results: A significantly higher spontaneous fertility rate (particularly in the first year after surgery) and lower ectopic pregnancy rate were found in Group B. ART success rates were not affected by different surgical approaches. Perioperative and obstetrical outcomes were similar in both groups., Conclusion: In patients affected by endometriosis, the choice between expectant management versus intervention should be personalized: when the estimated probability of natural conception is low, surgery may be considered as a second-line treatment. Conversely, in all other cases surgery should be offered early (as a first-line approach) as it improves the chance of spontaneous conception. The laparoscopic treatment of infertility due to endometriosis must be performed by a skilled specialized surgeon to ensure a complete "pelvic cleanout" while respecting the anatomical structures and reducing the risk of fertility impairment due to surgical procedures.

Purpose: Hysterectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in gynecology and, in over 95% of the cases, does not necessarily require the removal of the uterine cervix to be completed successfully. In clinical practice, however, less than 20% of gynecologists offer patients the possibility to express a personal preference concerning the choice between total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH). The aim of this study is to compare patients who have undergone TLH versus LSH for benign uterine diseases in terms of intra-operative/peri-operative surgical outcomes and short-term recovery of sexual function., Methods: We performed an observational, retrospective study on 478 women who underwent hysterectomy for benign uterine disease at Gyn/Ob Clinic, Department of Women's and Children's Health of Padua University between January 2003 and December 2012. Surgical data were recorded. We investigated and compared outcomes between the two groups of patients (TLH vs LSH) in terms of the following: surgical complications rate, post-operative therapy, women satisfaction and sexual activity recovery., Results: We found that operating time and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in patients who underwent LSH. A higher rate of post-operative fever was reported in the TLH treatment group although antibiotic prophylaxis was implemented in a similar fashion for both groups. At 60-70 days following surgery, women of LSH group reported a greater ease in recovery of sexual function as opposed to those who underwent TLH., Conclusions: The advantages and potential drawbacks of both procedures need to be discussed with women presenting with benign disease. LSH is a reasonable option for women, representing both an excellent minimally invasive approach in a proper clinical setting and an appropriate procedure for those women who prefer conservative surgery.