Search

Purpose: Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients' motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications., Methods: This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians., Results: A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (from 75.3% to 39.2%, P < 0.0001), and satisfaction with doctor-patient communications increased (from 61.9 to 91.8%, P = 0.0002). There were various reasons for requesting a second opinion, e.g., the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis, hope for change in the treatment recommendation or dissatisfaction with the initial physicians., Conclusions: Second opinions can lead to significantly greater patient satisfaction, meeting the need for information and leading to better management of patients in the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis. Doctor-patient communications play a key role.

Purpose: To evaluate complication rates associated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using the Hohl instrument in women with benign indications for hysterectomy, a prospective cohort study was conducted in a university teaching hospital., Methods: A total of 567 women with benign indications for hysterectomy underwent the TLH procedure using the Hohl instrument between January 2005 and July 2009. The laparoscopic approach was used when the patient had undergone more than one previous pelvic abdominal operation, when an adnexal finding was present, and/or if the patient had reduced vaginal capacity., Results: One ureteral injury (0.18%), four bladder injuries (0.71%), one small-bowel injury (0.18%), one vaginal injury (0.18%), and one conversion to abdominal hysterectomy (0.18%) occurred. The general complication rate during surgery was 1.42%, whereas in the postoperative period was 3.19%. The mean loss of hemoglobin was 1.47 g/dL (SD 1.06), the mean operating time was 103.87 min (SD 43.89), and the mean uterus weight was 241.41 g (SD 196.73)., Conclusions: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using the Hohl instrument simplifies the surgical procedure. The technique reported here is safe and effective in preventing ureteral complications during TLH, even in a university training program.