Search

Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation is a component of heart failure (HF) management, but its effect on ventricular arrhythmias is not well understood. We analyzed the antiarrhythmic effect of a 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) program and its influence on long-term cardiovascular mortality in HF patients taken from the TELEREHabilitation in Heart Failure Patients (TELEREH-HF) trial.Material and methods: We evaluated the presence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) and frequent premature ventricular complexes ≥ 10 beats/hour (PVCs ≥ 10) in 24-hour ECG monitoring at baseline and after 9-week HCTR or usual care (UC) of 773 HF patients (NYHA I-III, LVEF ≤ 40%). Functional response for HCTR was assessed by changes - delta (Δ) - in peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) as a result of comparing pVO2 from the beginning and the end of the program.Results: Among 143 patients with nsVT, arrhythmia subsided in 30.8% after HCTR. Similarly, among 165 patients randomized to UC who had nsVT 34.5% did not show it after 9 weeks (p = 0.481). There was no significant difference in the decrease in PVC ≥ 10 over 9 weeks between randomization arms (14.9% vs. 17.8%, respectively p = 0.410). Functional response for HCTR in ΔpVO2 > 2.0 ml/kg/min did not affect occurrence of arrhythmias. Multivariable analysis did not identify HCTR as an independent factor determining improvement of nsVT or PVCs ≥ 10. However, only in the HCTR group, the achievement of the antiarrhythmic effect significantly reduced the cardiovascular mortality in 2-year follow-up (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Significant improvement in physical capacity after 9 weeks of HCTR did not correlate with the antiarrhythmic effect in terms of incidence of nsVT or PVCs ≥ 10. An antiarrhythmic effect after the 9-week HCTR affected long-term cardiovascular mortality in HF patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) consisting of telecare (with psychological telesupport), telerehabilitation and remote monitoring of implantable devices might be an innovative option improving heart failure (HF) patients' quality of life (QoL) and emotional health. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of HCTR on various facets of QoL in HF patients in comparison with usual care (UC) alone.Material and Methods: The present analysis formed part of a multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled 850 HF patients (NYHA I-III, LVEF ≤ 40%). Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to HCTR plus UC or UC only. Patients underwent either an HCTR program or UC with observation. The psychological intervention in the HCTR group included supportive psychological counseling via mobile phone. The Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 Questionnaire was used to assess QoL. Measurements were made before and after a 9-week intervention (HCTR group)/observation (UC group).Results: After the intervention, the HCTR group showed significant improvement in overall QoL, physical domain (PD) of QoL, and 4 areas of QoL (physical functioning (PhF), role functioning related to physical state (RF), general health (GH), vitality (VI)). A significant positive change in QoL in the UC group was observed only in VI and social functioning. There were also significant differences in QoL after 9-week intervention/observation between the two groups. The results showed greater improvement in HCTR for overall QoL (p = 0.009), PD of QoL (p = 0.0003) and three specific areas of QoL: PhF (p = 0.001), RF (p = 0.003), bodily pain (BP) (p = 0.015).Conclusions: In comparison to UC, HCTR resulted in improvement in overall QoL, PD of QoL and 3 specific areas of QoL: PhF, RF and BP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]