Search

Introduction: The standard surgical procedure for unstable ankle fractures is fixation of the lateral malleolus with a plate and screws. This method has a high risk of complications, especially among patients with fragile skin conditions. The aim of this study was to estimate the re-operation rates and identify complications in patients with an unstable ankle fracture, surgically treated with an intramedullary screw or rush pin. Materials and methods: We identified all patients who were surgically treated with either a 3.5-mm screw or rush pin at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, from 2012 to 2018. Major complications were re-operations within three months. We included 80 patients, of which 55 (69%) were treated with a 3.5-mm intramedullary screw and 25 (31%) with a rush pin. The majority of the study population was female (59) and the mean age was 75 (range 24 to 100) years. Of the 80 patients included, 41 patients had more than 2 comorbidities. Results: Three patients underwent re-operation within three months due to either fracture displacement or hardware cutout. Radiographs obtained after six weeks showed that nine patients had loss of reduction. Additionally, four patients had superficial wound infections and six patients had delayed wound healing. Conclusions: Intramedullary fixation of distal fibula fractures with either a screw or rush pin has low re-operation rates. However, the high proportion of patients with radiological loss of reduction is concerning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Evidence of whether to use hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is still widely debated, especially when taking ambulatory status, age, and patient cognitive status into account. The current study aims to report the rates of dislocations, revisions and other complications for primary cemented HA in patients with displaced FNF. Materials and methods: Single-center retrospective follow-up study of an unselected historic cohort. 743 consecutive hips (551 W and 192 M) at mean (SD) age of 83.6 (8.4) years received primary cemented HA for displaced FNF by posterolateral surgical approach between January 2012 and December 2019. Patient files and radiographs were evaluated for dislocations, revisions, and other complications until death or end of the follow-up period, and the educational level of the surgeon was noted. Results: During a mean (SD) follow-up period of 2.7 (2.2) years, there were 6.1% (n = 45) dislocations, in which 82% (first dislocation) appeared within the first 30 postoperative days, and 51% (n = 23) of the dislocations requiring subsequent surgery. At the time of the last available follow-up, 57% (n = 421) of the patients were dead. A non-dislocation related revision was needed in 3.4% (n = 25) of the patients [in which infection accounted for 40% (n = 10) and traumatic periprosthetic fracture for 32% (n = 8)]. Thirty-day mortality was 9.2% and 1-year mortality 25.8%. There were no differences in patient's age, gender, or educational level of the surgeon between the dislocation and the no dislocation groups. Patients aged < 70 years presented with a higher dislocation rate (p < 0.001) than the patients aged > 70 years. Conclusion: Primary HA presents a safe and robust approach with acceptable complication rates in a genuine unselected cohort of displaced FNF, particularly for patients aged > 70. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]