1. Delphi Study to Determine Rehabilitation Research Priorities for Older Adults With Cancer.
- Author
-
Lyons KD, Radomski MV, Alfano CM, Finkelstein M, Sleight AG, Marshall TF, McKenna R, and Fu JB
- Subjects
- Accidental Falls prevention & control, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Geriatric Assessment methods, Humans, Public Health Surveillance methods, Quality of Health Care standards, Social Participation, Delphi Technique, Neoplasms rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Research organization & administration
- Abstract
Objective: To solicit expert opinions and develop consensus around the research that is needed to improve cancer rehabilitation for older adults., Design: Delphi methods provided a structured process to elicit and prioritize research questions from national experts., Setting: National, Web-based survey., Participants: Members (N=32) of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine completed at least 1 of 3 investigator-developed surveys., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: In the first survey, participants identified up to 5 research questions that needed to be answered to improve cancer rehabilitation for older adults. In 2 subsequent surveys, participants viewed the compilation of questions, rated the importance of each question, and identified the 5 most important questions. This generated priority scores for each question. Consensus scores were created to describe the degree of agreement around the priority of each question., Results: Highest priority research concerns the epidemiology and measurement of function and disability in older adult cancer survivors; the effects of cancer rehabilitation interventions on falls, disability, participation, survival, costs, quality of care, and health care utilization; and testing models of care that facilitate referrals from oncology to rehabilitation providers as part of coordinated, multicomponent care., Conclusions: A multipronged approach is needed to fill these gaps, including targeted funding opportunities developed with an advisory panel of cancer rehabilitation experts, development of a research network to facilitate novel collaborations and grant proposals, and coordinated efforts of clinical groups to advocate for funding, practice change, and policy change., (Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF