1. Can the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised Be Used in Patients With a Tracheostomy?
- Author
-
Nicolas Lejeune, Aurore Thibaut, Charlotte Martial, Géraldine Martens, Camille Chatelle, Steven Laureys, Sarah Wannez, UCL - SSS/IONS/COSY - Systems & cognitive Neuroscience, UCL - (SLuc) Service de neurologie, UCL - (SLuc) Centre neurologique William Lennox, and ULiège - GIGA-Consciousness
- Subjects
Male ,Nociception ,030506 rehabilitation ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Pain ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Brain injuries ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Nociceptive Pain ,Diagnosis, Differential ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Tracheostomy ,Medicine ,Humans ,Minimally conscious state ,Persistent vegetative state ,Pain Measurement ,Coma ,Rehabilitation ,business.industry ,Glasgow Coma Scale ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Anesthesia ,Mann–Whitney U test ,Consciousness Disorders ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,0305 other medical science ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Cohort study - Abstract
Objective To investigate the influence of the presence of a tracheostomy tube to assess pain with the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). Design A cohort study in which patients were evaluated at a single time point. Setting Patients were evaluated in a tertiary care hospital. Participants Patients (N=125) (unresponsive wakefulness syndrome [UWS]: 46 patients, minimally conscious state [MCS]: 74 patients, emerging from MCS [eMCS]: 5 patients, mean age: 46±16y, time since injury: 817±1280d) in a convenience sample were evaluated with the NCS-R after noxious stimulation. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures We compared the NCS-R scores of patients with and without tracheostomy with a Mann-Whitney U test. A secondary outcome was to evaluate the influence of the presence of a tracheostomy on the previously described cutoff score of 2. Results The presence of a tracheostomy was associated with lower verbal subscores (P=.002) as well as total scores (P=.039). The cutoff score of 2 remained valid for the group of patients with tracheostomy with a high sensitivity (71.43%) and specificity (89.29%), as well as when we excluded the verbal subscore of the NCS-R (sensitivity=83.2% and specificity=92.4%). Conclusion Our study confirms the validity of the NCS-R in DOC patients with a tracheostomy. However, the presence of a nonspeaking tracheostomy should be clearly mentioned when applying the NCS-R, because it significantly lowers the verbal subscore.
- Published
- 2019