Search

We report here a 20-year old woman who referred to our clinic for identify the responsible antigen of anaphylaxis. Five days before the reaction, she had a cold and had taken a gel capsule cold medicine, Stona IB Gel®. On the day of the reaction, she took a dose of Stona IB Gel® after eating yogurt. Five minutes after oral administration, she developed a heat sensation and pruritus on her neck, with flushing, abdominal pains, breathing difficulties, and syncope. The specific IgE antibodies measured by ImmunoCAP® were all negative except for gelatin. Prick-prick skin testing revealed positive responses to Stona IB Gel®, gelatin KS and gelatin RP600, of which the latter two were included in the Stona IB Gel® capsule. From these test results, she was diagnosed with anaphylaxis due to gelatin, and to date she has had no further allergic symptoms since avoiding foods containing gelatin. In infancy she had received four vaccinations against diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus, which contained gelatin as a stabilizer. However, she had not developed allergic symptoms until this time. We hypothesize that she might be sensitized to gelatin by taking Stona IB Gel® during the preceding 4 days. This is the first case of anaphylaxis from the ingestion of an oral medication containing gelatin in Japan. Allergic reactions to gelatin are comparatively rare, but according to the past reports, the reactions were severe. Since many kinds of foods, cosmetics, pharmaceutical products, and medication contain gelatin, it is important to be aware of gelatin allergy.

A 29-year-old woman had an episode of urticaria at the age of 17 while exercising after eating fried cuttlefish. For years thereafter, she experienced several episodes of urticaria after eating seafood. At the age of 29, she ate grilled seafood, including cuttlefish for supper after taking loxoprofen for lumbago. One hour later, she developed generalized urticaria accompanied by nausea, abdominal pain, swelling of the lips, and dyspnea while walking; she was taken to a hospital. She was then referred to us for further examination of the etiology of her anaphylactic reactions. The level of specific IgE measured using Immuno CAP was negative for all kinds of foods, including cuttlefish. However, a skin prick test was positive for raw and cooked cuttlefish. Provocation tests were performed on admission by combining the intake of cuttlefish and aspirin under the suspicion of cuttlefish allergy enhanced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and exercise. As a result, she developed no symptoms except for slight itching of the oral mucosa after eating 20 g or 100 g of cuttlefish with or without concomitant administration of 0.5 g of aspirin. Finally, generalized urticaria appeared after challenge with cuttlefish and 1.5 g of aspirin. She was diagnosed with food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) caused by cuttlefish. She has not developed urticaria since she started to avoid eating cuttlefish. Our results indicated that in provocation tests for the diagnosis of FDEIA, allergic reactions could not only be induced by food intake but could also be enhanced by aspirin in a dose-dependent manner.

A 75-year-old man ingested salted fish guts made of Sagittated calamari which he caught in the daytime, with alcohol and then dozed. Five hours later, he woke up due to itching over his entire body and noticed generalized urticaria and a swollen tongue, which was too large for him to close his mouth. Serum total IgE was 456 IU/ml and ImmunoCAP was positive for anisakis, but negative for squid, shrimp, and ascaris. A skin prick test (SPT) was positive for anisakis extract (10 mg/ml) and house dust mites, but negative for squid and shrimp. He was diagnosed with IgE-mediated allergy due to Anisakis simplex after the ingestion of salted fish guts made of Sagittated calamari, which had been parasitized by Anisakis simplex. Furthermore, we performed SPT with six extracts of purified or recombinant allergens (Ani s 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8) to identify the causative allergens in this case. Only Ani s 3 (tropomyosin) was positive, indicating that Ani s 3 was the causative allergen in this case. Third stage larvae of the nematode Anisakis simplex often parasitize not only marine fish but also invertebrates, including squid. It is necessary to consider Anisakis simplex allergy for urticarial reactions that develop after the ingestion of squid.

We report two cases of anaphylactic reactions to peach with negative result of ImmunoCAP to peach. Case 1 is a 35-year-old man, who felt an itch in his oral cavity immediately after ingesting a whole fresh peach. He rapidly developed generalized urticaria, dyspnea, vomiting, and loss of consciousness. He recovered after treatment at a local hospital, thereafter he was referred to our hospital because ImmunoCAP conducted for screening allergens revealed a negative test result to peach and the cause of anaphylaxis remained unclear. He had a history of pollinosis. He reported that he previously felt an itch on his oral cavity after ingesting melon, watermelon, apple, and strawberry. Serum total IgE was 436 IU/ml. CAP-RAST revealed negative results to peach, strawberry and kiwi. Skin prick tests (SPTs) with raw peach pulp, canned peach pulp, strawberry and kiwi were positive. Case 2 is a 30-year-old woman who felt an itch on her oral cavity accompanied by blepharedema, rhinorrhea, generalized urticaria, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea after eating peach. She had a history of pollinosis. She reported that she previously developed urticaria after ingesting an apple. Serum total IgE was 85 IU/ml. ImmunoCAP revealed negative results to peach and apple. SPTs with canned yellow peach, strawberry and apple were positive. Consequently, the two patients were diagnosed with anaphylaxis due to peach, and allergic symptoms have never recurred since they avoided ingesting peach. Furthermore, in two patients ImmunoCAP to rPru p 1, rPru p 3, and rPru p 4 were negative. However, in IgE-immunoblotting of peach, serum IgE antibodies of two patients were bound to approximately 10 kDa proteins. Meanwhile, the cross-reactivity between Rosaceae fruits, such as peach, apple, apricot, and plum, has been reported. These results suggest that in patients, who are suspected of having peach anaphylaxis and show a negative ImmunoCAP result to peach, the additional testing, such as SPT with peach, should be performed for diagnosis.

Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) to plant foods is often caused by cross-reactivity to pollen. We investigated whether there was any significant correlation between sensitization to the pollen of alder and Japanese cedar flying off in spring and prevalence of OAS in Yokohama region.We measured specific IgE antibodies (CAP-FEIA: CAP) against alder and Japanese cedar in 337 outpatients with skin allergy in 2005 (M:F=167:170, 33.4 years of age, on the average). In the patients who showed positive response to CAP against alder and Japanese cedar, we also tested response to CAP against rBet v 1 and rBet v 2. In addition, we statistically analyzed whether there was any correlation between prevalence of OAS and sensitization to the pollen.Ratio of positive response to CAP against alder was 23.4% (79 cases) while that to CAP against Japanese cedar was 73.7% (244 cases). Response to CAP against rBet v 1 and rBet v 2 was tested in 55 cases, and the ratio of positive response to CAP against rBet v 1 was 43.6% (24 cases) while that to CAP against rBet v 2 was 27.3% (15 cases). Prevalence of OAS showed a significant positive correlation (p0.001) with sensitization to alder, but no correlation with sensitization to Japanese cedar.It was suggested that sensitization to alder pollen would be involved in prevalence of OAS in Yokohama region.

The clinical features of many patients with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) due to plant-derived foods have rarely been reported in Japan.We aimed to determine the causative foods of OAS due to plant-derived foods based on clinical features and skin prick tests (SPTs). Furthermore, we aimed to elucidate the association between causative foods and sensitized pollens in patients with OAS due to plant-derived foods.SPTs and specific IgE measurements (CAP-FEIA: CAP) were performed in relation to foods and pollens in 118 patients with positive histories of OAS due to plant-derived foods. Patients with positive histories and with positive skin test responses were identified as having type I allergy to the causative foods.The mean age of 63 patients with positive histories and positive skin test responses was 29.2 years (range, 2-61 years), and there were twice as many females as male. The most frequent causative foods were found to be apple, peach, kiwi, and melon in 13, 12, 12, and 11 patients, respectively. CAP frequency was shown to be similar to that of SPT regarding apple, whereas it was less than that of SPT regarding melon, peach, and kiwi. A significant correlation between the frequencies of SPT and CAP was found regarding apple (r=0.39, p0.05) but not peach, kiwi, and melon. Forty-one of 63 patients with OAS (66.1%) had pollinosis and/or allergic rhinitis. In patients with OAS due to apple, the positive ratio of CAP response against alder pollen was higher than that in patients with OAS due to melon. In patients with OAS due to melon, the positive ratio of CAP responses against ragweed pollen, grass pollen, and mugwort pollen was higher than that in patients with OAS due to apple.In this study, positive ratios of SPT and CAP tended to differ according to the causative food, showing a smaller potential for reaction than might be suggested by patient history. Therefore, for the time being it would be more accurate to use a skin test for the diagnosis of OAS due to plant-derived foods.

A 20-year-old woman was referred for evaluation after about 2 years of recurrent episodes of localized urticaria during handling of several kinds of raw fish in a sushi shop, where she had worked part-time for 2 years. She had also experienced allergic symptoms such as itching and swelling of her lips, generalized urticaria, laryngeal tightness, stridor and dyspnea immediately after ingestion of raw and cooked seafood, including sole, horse mackerel, sea eel and shellfish, over the previous 1 year before referral. Skin prick tests and blood test for specific IgE antibodies were positive for many kinds of seafood, including sole, horse mackerel, sea eel, eel, crab, and abalone, which belonged to different taxonomic phyla, including Chordata, Arthropoda, and Mollusca. A challenge with a piece of broiled sole induced swelling of the lips, obstruction of the larynx, difficulty with deglutition, and abdominal pain. In addition, serum-specific IgE antibodies to two major fish allergens, parvalbumin and collagen, were detected by ELISA, suggesting that allergic symptoms could be induced by many kinds of seafood in the present patient. She was therefore diagnosed with occupational contact urticaria and oral allergy syndrome due to seafood. At the time of this report, the present patient had been followed for one year and no reactions have occurred since she started to avoid the causative types of seafood.

Aspirin has been known to be an enhancer to wheat allergy, including wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis.To investigate whether nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin would enhance allergic reactions after wheat ingestion and whether antihistamines and disodium cromoglycate would prevent these reactions.Seven cases, whose reactions after wheat ingestion were enhanced by aspirin on challenge tests, were enrolled. Skin prick tests (SPT) and CAP-RAST were undergone for wheat and gluten. We used challenge tests of wheat after pretreatment of NSAIDs and preventive drugs.Four cases were diagnosed with wheat allergy, 3 cases had wheat-dependent, salicylic acid-induced anaphylaxis. SPT and CAP-RAST were positive for wheat and gluten in 5 of 7 cases and 4 of 7 cases, respectively. Dicrofenac enhanced the allergic reactions after wheat ingestion in 1 of 2 cases, whereas etodolac failed to enhance the symptoms in all 5 cases performed. Furthermore, disodium cromoglycate could not completely prevent the allergic reaction in all 4 cases and even enhanced the reaction in 1 case of them. To see an inhibitory effect of antihistamines on the symptoms, fexofenadine (in 2, 1 and 1 case, respectively), olopatadine, and chlorpheniramine were administrated before the challenge test, and as a result these drugs were found to have inhibitory effects on the allergic reaction.In this study, it was suggested that etodolac might be a relatively safe anti-inflammatory drug on wheat allergy and antihistamines could prevent allergic reactions more than DSCG in patients with wheat allergy.

A 23-year-old woman experienced generalized urticaria and loss of consciousness during walking after ingestion of wheat. Skin prick test and CAP-RAST were positive for gluten. An oral challenge test using 100g wheat was positive without exercise. The patient was given diagnosis of wheat allergy. In addition, not only exercise but also administration of 500mg aspirin were found to exacerbate her symptoms after the ingestion of wheat, suggesting that acetylsalicylic acid could be an augmentation factor in wheat allergy. Etodorac failed to enhance the symptoms. Further, oral administration of Fexofenadine could prevent allergic reactions induced by ingestion of 100g wheat, but sodium cromoglycate partially reduced the reactions.