Search

OBJECTIVE Seropositivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)/rheumatoid factor (RF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased overall mortality; however, the association between antibody titers and mortality is not well established. Investigating relationships between antibody titers and mortality may clarify their role in RA pathogenesis. This study was undertaken to evaluate the association of antibody titers with mortality and its modification by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS Eligible patients with established RA were identified through administrative claims data linked to laboratory results (2005-2016). Patients were categorized by positivity status for ACPA, RF, or both. Patients were further divided into groups by autoantibody titers. DMARD-exposed patients were categorized into biologic DMARD (bDMARD) and conventional DMARD (cDMARD) subcohorts. Crude mortality rates/1,000 patient-years and Kaplan-Meier curves were compared between antibody categories. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression and sensitivity (propensity-matched patients) analyses were conducted. RESULTS Overall, 53,849 and 79,926 patients had evaluable ACPA and RF status, respectively. For both autoantibodies, mortality rates were significantly higher in seropositive versus seronegative patients (risk increase of 48.0% and 44.0% in ACPA- and RF-positive patients, respectively; P < 0.001 each). Mortality rates were greatest in patients with higher versus lower autoantibody titers (ACPA hazard ratio [HR] 1.60 [95% confidence interval (95% CI]) 1.45-1.76]; RF HR 1.78 [95% CI 1.66-1.91]). In cDMARD-exposed patients, HRs were higher in seropositive versus seronegative cohorts; in bDMARD-exposed patients, there was no difference in mortality by serostatus. CONCLUSION Elevated ACPA/RF titers were independently associated with increased mortality among patients with RA and persisted in patients treated with cDMARDs but not with bDMARDs.

Objective Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often ask whether specific foods, popularized as inflammatory or antiinflammatory, can improve or worsen their RA. Patients with RA took a survey on diet and RA symptoms, and the survey data were collected and analyzed. Methods A dietary survey was mailed to 300 subjects in a single-center RA registry at a large academic center. Subjects were asked about their consumption of 20 foods and whether these foods make their RA symptoms better, worse, or unchanged. Semiannual registry data include demographics, medications, comorbidities, and disease activity scores. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank sum tests evaluated associations between subject characteristics from the most recent registry assessment and changes in RA symptoms from specific foods. Results Of the 217 subjects (72% response rate), 83% were female; the median RA duration was 17 years (interquartile range 9–27 years), and 58% were taking a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Twenty-four percent of subjects reported that foods affect their RA symptoms, with 15% reporting improvement and 19% reporting worsening. Blueberries and spinach were the foods most often reported to improve RA symptoms, while soda with sugar and desserts were those most often reported to worsen RA symptoms. Younger age and noting that sleep, warm room temperature, and vitamin/mineral supplements improve RA were each associated with reporting that foods affect RA symptoms. Medication use, sex, body mass index, smoking, disease duration, disease activity scores, and self-reported RA flares were not associated with reporting that foods affect RA. Conclusion Nearly one-quarter of RA subjects with longstanding disease reported that diet had an effect on their RA symptoms.

Objective Previous cross-sectional studies have shown that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with fibromyalgia (FM) have higher disease activity, greater medical costs, and worse quality of life compared to RA patients without FM. We determined the impact of FM on 2-year changes in the functional status of RA patients in a prospective study. Methods Subjects included participants in the Brigham Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study who were enrolled in a substudy of the effects of pain in RA. Subjects completed questionnaires, including the Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Polysymptomatic Distress (PSD) scale, semiannually, and underwent physical examination and laboratory tests yearly. Results Of the 156 included RA subjects, 16.7% had FM, while 83.3% did not. In a multivariable linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, race, baseline MDHAQ score, disease duration, rheumatoid factor/cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody seropositivity, disease activity, and psychological distress, RA patients with FM had a 0.14 greater 2-year increase in MDHAQ score than RA patients without FM (P = 0.021). In secondary analyses examining the association between continuous PSD scale score and change in MDHAQ, higher PSD scale scores were significantly associated with greater 2-year increases in MDHAQ score (β coefficient 0.013, P = 0.011). Conclusion Both the presence of FM and increasing number of FM symptoms predicted worsening of functional status among individuals with RA. Among individuals with RA and FM, the magnitude of the difference in changes in MDHAQ was 4- to 7-fold higher than typical changes in MDHAQ score among individuals with established RA.

Objective: To characterize physical activity (PA) participation (meeting ≥150-minutes of moderate intensity or 75-minutes of vigorous (MVPA/week)), examine associations between disease activity and MVPA and identify MVPA correlates in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 3 years. Methods: This study included 573 RA patients (94% Caucasian, 83% female, mean age 61 years, mean RA duration 19.5 years) with ≥1 annual registry visit and who completed the PA questionnaire. Baseline and annual measures included: demographics/medical history, self-efficacy for disease management, quality of life, patient/physician global assessment, physical function, and self-reported PA. A logistic repeated measures model using the Generalized Estimation Equation examined the relationship between disease activity and MVPA. Results: Average disease activity (DAS28-CRP3) was 3.1 (SD, 1.4), 36% were physically inactive and 29% met MVPA recommendations. There was a negative borderline association with disease activity (OR=0.89; 95%CI 0.79–1.00). Correlates of meeting MVPA recommendations, adjusting for disease activity, were being Caucasian (OR=2.95; 95%CI 1.29–6.75), older age (age >69 OR=0.58; 95%CI 0.36–0.92) poor mental health (OR=0.63; 95%CI 0.41–0.95), poor physical function (OR=0.59; 95%CI 0.34–1.01), overweight/obese (body mass index >25–30 OR=0.69; 95%CI 0.50–0.95; >30–39.9 OR=0.60; 95%CI 0.41–0.88; ≤40 OR=0.24; 95%CI 0.08–0.74) and patient global assessment (≥10-20) OR=0.57; 95%CI 0.39–0.83). Conclusions: A small proportion met MVPA recommendations despite well-controlled disease. Disease activity was negatively associated with PA over time. PA correlates were linked to lifestyle, mental health and patient perceptions of disease, suggesting PA interventions that address patient perspectives may facilitate RA management. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Objective To report 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the head-to-head Abatacept versus Adalimumab Comparison in Biologic-Naive RA Subjects with Background Methotrexate (MTX) (AMPLE) trial. Methods AMPLE was a phase IIIb, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Biologic-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to MTX were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (125 mg/week) or adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks) with background MTX. PROs (pain, fatigue, ability to perform work, and ability to perform daily activities) were compared up to year 2 for patients in each treatment group, as well as those who achieved low disease activity at both years 1 and 2 (responders) and those who did not (nonresponders). Results A total of 646 patients were randomized and treated with SC abatacept (n = 318) or adalimumab (n = 328). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 treatment arms. Comparable improvements in PROs were observed in the abatacept and adalimumab groups over 2 years, with both groups achieving clinically meaningful improvements in PROs from baseline. At year 2, fatigue improved by 23.4 mm and 21.5 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale with abatacept and adalimumab, respectively. Clinical responders achieved greater improvements in PROs than nonresponders. Conclusion In biologic-naive patients with active RA, despite prior MTX, treatment with SC abatacept or adalimumab with background MTX resulted in comparable improvements in PROs, which were highly correlated with physician-reported clinical response end points.

Objective To evaluate associations between achieving guideline‐recommended targets of disease activity, defined by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C‐reactive protein level (DAS28‐CRP)

Objective Loss of participants in longitudinal data collection can affect the validity of outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) registries. Prior research indicates that demographics and socioeconomic and psychosocial factors contribute to attrition. This study analyzed the characteristics of an RA registry that may contribute to attrition in a hospital-based population. Methods Subjects consisted of RA patients enrolled in the Brigham and Women's Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study. Demographics and clinical and psychological factors were evaluated in univariate analyses to determine differences between participants who dropped out and those who completed 5 years of followup. Univariate factors with a P value

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that can cause severe joint damage and disability. During the last decades, the number of therapeutic agents and the knowledge about treatment strategies for RA have increased substantially (1). This has left clinicians with more treatment choices, but also in need of tools to identify the right patients to treat aggressively with more effective, but expensive medication with potentially serious adverse events. Risk model matrices have been proposed as clinical tools to identify RA patients at high risk of rapid radiographic progression (RRP) (2–5) or with probable response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment (6). In addition, models to predict response to anti-TNF therapy in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have been published recently (7), highlighting the interest in risk models within rheumatology. Clinicians might apply current risk models in their daily practice, but we have limited knowledge about whether the use of the models should be restricted to patient populations similar to the study populations used for the model development. Risk models are common in cardiology, with the Framingham Risk Scores (8) and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) (9) as examples of risk models for cardiovascular disease. Several publications have discussed the validation and development of such models, focusing on statistical methods to assess model fit and compare the classification abilities of different models(10–14). Statistics have been developed to measure the degree of correct reclassification by a new model compared to a previous model, such as reclassification calibration statistics, net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement (Table 1). These methods add information to traditional discriminatory abilities, for example the c-statistics. Table 1 An overview of statistical methods to assess risk models (12;14) Risk models developed in clinical trials may not be directly applicable to daily clinical settings, as selected patient groups are included in trials, often with aggressive disease of short duration. In this paper, we assess the performance of three models for prediction of RRP in RA in an observational cohort representing a broad RA population. All three models were developed in clinical trials populations. We apply statistical methods previously used to assess risk models in other specialties.

Objective To assess the safety and tolerability of tocilizumab (TCZ) as monotherapy or in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response at study entry to their current treatment with biologic agents or DMARDs. Methods This 24-week, multicenter, open-label, phase IIIb study conducted in the US enrolled 886 patients. Treatments were allocated to patients based on their current therapy at study entry. Patients receiving monotherapy with biologic agents were assigned to TCZ 8 mg/kg monotherapy. All other patients were randomized to either TCZ 4 mg/kg + DMARDs or TCZ 8 mg/kg + DMARDs. The primary end point was the number and percentage of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) during 24 weeks of TCZ treatment. Efficacy assessments were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results Overall, 69 patients (7.8%) reported ≥1 SAEs. The rate of SAEs per 100 person-years was 28.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 23.1–34.4) overall and was similar across treatment groups: 29.1 (95% CI 21.0–39.2), 30.3 (95% CI 22.2–40.2), and 20.6 (95% CI 10.3–36.9) in the TCZ 4/8 mg/kg + DMARDs, TCZ 8 mg/kg + DMARDs, and TCZ 8 mg/kg monotherapy groups, respectively. The most common SAEs were infections (i.e., pneumonia [1.0%] and cellulitis [0.9%]). In addition, American College of Rheumatology response rates and reductions in mean Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count were generally similar among treatment groups. Conclusion The safety findings in this study were consistent with the previously identified safety profile of TCZ. TCZ had an AE profile consistent with prior randomized blinded studies and was effective when administered as either monotherapy or in combination with DMARDs for the treatment of RA.

Objective The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) hybrid (a modified mean percent response to treatment) was officially recommended by the ACR as a revision to 20%, 50%, and 70% response criteria (ACR20/50/70) scores, but has not been tested in clinical trials. We performed a post hoc analysis of a phase III study of certolizumab pegol (Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage 1 [RAPID 1]) using the ACR hybrid. Methods Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomized to certolizumab pegol (200 mg or 400 mg every other week) plus methotrexate or placebo plus methotrexate. ACR hybrid scores were compared with ACR20/50/70 outcomes. Results Differences between active treatment and placebo were significant throughout the study using the ACR20 and ACR hybrid outcomes. In the certolizumab pegol 200 mg group, the median ACR hybrid score at week 52 (last observation carried forward) was 49.99. A total of 258 (65.8%) of 392 and 172 (43.9%) of 392 patients had ACR20 and ACR50 responses, respectively. An additional 55 patients (14.0%) and 59 patients (15.1%) had mean improvements in ACR core measures of ≥20% and ≥50%, respectively, and therefore had positive ACR hybrid scores, despite lacking ACR20 and ACR50 responses, respectively. In the placebo group, median ACR hybrid scores were

Objective To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods Adult patients with early RA or longstanding RA received etanercept in open-label extension studies following initial double-blind trials of etanercept. Results Of 558 early RA patients and 714 longstanding RA patients who received at least 1 dose of etanercept, a total of 194 early RA patients and 217 longstanding RA patients were treated with 25 mg of etanercept twice weekly through 10 years. Five opportunistic infections were reported: in early RA, 1 Candida septicemia; in longstanding RA, 1 herpes zoster, 1 atypical mycobacterium infection, 1 meningoencephalitis (unspecified), and 1 fungal sepsis (unspecified). Twenty-nine cases of sepsis occurred (10 early RA, 19 longstanding RA). Occurrence of all malignancies was similar to that expected in the general population, but the occurrence of lymphomas was higher than expected in the general population. Fourteen lymphomas (7 early RA, 7 longstanding RA) and 2 cases of demyelinating disease (1 early RA, 1 longstanding RA) were reported. Deaths occurred in 18 early RA patients and 43 longstanding RA patients. Both patient groups showed sustained improvement in American College of Rheumatology responses, swollen joint counts, Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index scores, and C-reactive protein levels. Conclusion Etanercept maintained therapeutic benefits beyond 10 years of therapy in both early RA and longstanding RA patients, suggesting that etanercept is well tolerated and effective as a long-term, continuous therapy for the treatment of RA, with a favorable risk/benefit ratio.

The management of the rheumatoid patient involves the considered use of pharmacologic agents as therapies to induce symptomatic relief and to reduce disease activity. Aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are used initially to lessen the degree of pain and swelling associated with the inflammatory disease process. The aggressive institution of second-line therapy, previously known as disease-modifying antiinflammatory rheumatic drugs, is advocated to modify the disease course itself. These second-line treatments include antimalarials, gold salts, methotrexate, d-penicillamine, and azathioprine. Randomized placebo controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these compounds in this illness. Improvement in standard parameters of disease activity (number of painful and swollen joints, duration of morning stiffness, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) can be related to the therapeutic value of second-line agents. Whether they modify radiographic progression is under rigorous study. Newer therapies under research investigation include sulfasalazine, cyclosporin A, and combination therapy.