Search

There is no standardized approach to the treatment of pediatric antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). Because of the rarity of pediatric AAV, randomized trials have not been feasible. The present study of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) was undertaken to establish consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for severe pediatric AAV to enable the future study of comparative effectiveness and safety. A workgroup of CARRA members (rheumatologists and nephrologists) formed the AAV Workgroup. This group performed a literature review on existing evidence‐based treatments and guidelines for the management of AAV. They determined that the target population for CTP development was patients <18 years of age with new‐onset granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis, or renal‐limited AAV (eosinophilic GPA was excluded), with presentation confined to those with severe disease (i.e., organ‐ or life‐threatening). Face‐to‐face consensus conferences employed nominal group techniques to identify treatment strategies for remission induction and remission maintenance, data elements to be systematically collected, and outcomes to be measured over time. The pediatric AAV Workgroup developed 2 CTPs for each of the remission induction and remission maintenance of severe AAV. A glucocorticoid‐weaning regimen for induction and maintenance, a core data set, and outcome measures were also defined. A random sample of CARRA membership voted acceptance of the CTPs for remission induction and remission maintenance, with a 94% (75 of 80) and 98% (78 of 80) approval rate, respectively. Consensus methodology established standardized CTPs for treating severe pediatric AAV. These CTPs were in principle accepted by CARRA‐wide membership for the evaluation of pragmatic comparative effectiveness in a long‐term registry.

Noninvasive estimation of the degree of inflammation seen on kidney biopsy with lupus nephritis (LN) remains difficult. The objective of this study was to develop a Renal Activity Index for Lupus (RAIL) that, based solely on laboratory measures, accurately reflects histologic LN activity. We assayed traditional LN laboratory tests and 16 urine biomarkers (UBMs) in children (n = 47) at the time of kidney biopsy. Histologic LN activity was measured by the National Institutes of Health activity index (NIH‐AI) and the tubulointerstitial activity index (TIAI). High LN‐activity status (versus moderate/low) was defined as NIH‐AI scores >10 (versus ≤10) or TIAI scores >5 (versus ≤5). RAIL algorithms that predicted LN‐activity status for both NIH‐AI and TIAI were derived by stepwise multivariate logistic regression, considering traditional biomarkers and UBMs as candidate components. The accuracy of the RAIL for discriminating by LN‐activity status was determined. The differential excretion of 6 UBMs (neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, ceruloplasmin, adiponectin, hemopexin, and kidney injury molecule 1) standardized by urine creatinine was considered in the RAIL. These UBMs predicted LN‐activity (NIH‐AI) status with >92% accuracy and LN‐activity (TIAI) status with >80% accuracy. RAIL accuracy was minimally influenced by concomitant LN damage. Accuracies between 71% and 85% were achieved without standardization of the UBMs. The strength of these UBMs to reflect LN‐activity status was confirmed by principal component and linear discriminant analyses. The RAIL is a robust and highly accurate noninvasive measure of LN activity. The measurement properties of the RAIL, which reflect the degree of inflammatory changes as seen on kidney biopsy, will require independent validation.