1. Effect of Hematocrit on the CO2 Removal Rate of Artificial Lungs
- Author
-
Katelin S. Omecinski, William J. Federspiel, Brian J. Frankowski, and Alexandra G. May
- Subjects
Extracorporeal Circulation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,ARDS ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Biomedical Engineering ,Biophysics ,Bioengineering ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Hematocrit ,Article ,Artificial lung ,Extracorporeal ,Biomaterials ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Co2 removal ,medicine ,Animals ,Lung ,Saline ,Respiratory Distress Syndrome ,COPD ,Noninvasive Ventilation ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Carbon Dioxide ,medicine.disease ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030228 respiratory system ,Cardiology ,Cattle ,Artificial Organs ,business ,human activities ,circulatory and respiratory physiology - Abstract
Extracorporeal CO(2) removal (ECCO(2)R) can permit lung protective or noninvasive ventilation strategies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). With evidence supporting ECCO(2)R growing, investigating factors which affect CO(2) removal is necessary. Multiple factors are known to affect the CO(2) removal rate (vCO(2)) which can complicate the interpretation of changes in vCO(2); however, the effect of hematocrit on the vCO(2) of artificial lungs has not been investigated. This in vitro study evaluates the relationship between hematocrit level and vCO(2) within an ECCO(2)R device. In vitro gas transfer was measured in bovine blood in accordance with the ISO 7199 standard. Plasma and saline were used to hemodilute the blood to hematocrits between 33% and 8%. The vCO(2) significantly decreased as the blood was hemodiluted with saline and plasma by 42% and 32%, respectively, between a hematocrit of 33% and 8%. The hemodilution method did not significantly affect the vCO(2). In conclusion, the hematocrit level significantly affects vCO(2) and should be taken into account when interpreting changes in the vCO(2) of an ECCO(2)R device.
- Published
- 2020