Search

Liquid Desiccant Air Conditioning and Dehumidification (LDAC) has been emerging in the past 10 to 15 years as an energy-saving alternative design for applications that require high moisture removal and a Cleantech solution that has the potential to provide significant energy savings when applied to more broad markets. Buildings are the primary users of electricity in the U.S., consuming about 75% of the total electricity produced and about 40% of all U.S. primary energy use and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A substantial portion of that energy is used for air conditioning and dehumidification. Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reports that U.S. buildings account for 35% of the U.S. carbon dioxide emissions that drive the climate crisis. One specific application that requires significant moisture removal is the indoor cultivation of legal cannabis. It is estimated by the DOE that by the end of this decade, electrical energy usage by indoor cannabis operations will be on par with the electrical energy consumed by either data centers or for the recharging of electrical vehicles. More recent projections indicate cannabis sales are expected to double from 2021 to 2030. As such, more efficient and economical methods of climate control are necessary for more widespread application in cannabis operations to reduce the energy requirements. The added emphasis should be on methods to first reduce the energy required before building the electrical generating infrastructure to support such growing industries. Climate control of indoor cannabis cultivation is one such aspect where energy-efficient air conditioning and dehumidification can contribute to reducing the projected energy usage by end of this decade. This paper gives an overview of a standalone LDAC system and a hybrid LDAC combined with an air handling unit. This paper will present indoor grow room case studies from a side-by-side installation of a hybrid LDAC unit and Desiccant Wheel (DW) air handling system in two identical cannabis grow rooms. Integration with a Combined Heat and Power (CHP or cogeneration) plant onsite supplying energy for both the technologies will be examined. Further, comparative energy analyses of LDAC, DW technology, and other widely used technologies in the HVAC indoor growing environment will be discussed. This will be the first comprehensive, side-by-side performance and energy analysis of competing desiccant (LDAC and DW) technologies in a controlled, indoor agriculture environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aligning with the global movements towards mitigating CO2 emissions and regulations to phase-down HFC refrigerants, many low-Global Warming Potential (GWP) refrigerants are being tested and proposed as fourth-generation refrigerants. R1234yf (HFO-1234yf) is a refrigerant with GWP <1 (0.31) and has replaced R134a (HFC-134a), which has GWP 1300, in automobile air conditioning systems and has a high potential to replace it in domestic refrigerators. In this paper, an energy performance evaluation and a life cycle climate performance assessment for R1234yf were conducted and compared to R134a. The study involved two identical domestic refrigerators with the same refrigerant charge that is recommended by the manufacturer. R1234yf showed resulted in similar cabinets air and refrigerant temperatures. However, the discharge temperature for the R1234yf refrigerator was relatively higher temperature than that for R134a. Also, R1234yf demonstrated higher daily energy consumption and more extended compressor run-time than of R134a. On the other hand, R1234yf proved significantly lower direct emissions and higher indirect emissions than those caused by R134a. Overall, R1234yf resulted in 3% reduction in the Lifecycle Climate Performance (LCCP) CO2 emissions compared to R134a. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]