Search

Abstract: Background: Acral melanoma (AM) and mucosal melanoma (MM) make up more than half of melanomas in Asia but comprise only 5% of cases in Caucasians, where cutaneous melanoma (CM) predominates. AM and MM are thought to be genetically and biologically distinct from CM. We report the characteristics and outcomes of melanoma patients from the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Methods: Case records of 210 patients treated between 2002 and 2014 were reviewed. Results: Median follow‐up was 2.5 years. CM, AM and MM made up of 37.6%, 33.8% and 16.2% of cases, respectively, with 6.2% each having ocular melanoma and unknown primary. Caucasians made up 16.2% of patients, accounting for 36.7% of CM but only 2.8 of AM and 2.9% of MM. Patients with MM (2.9% stage I, 14.7% stage IV) presented with higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage than those with AM (16.9% stage I, 5.6% stage IV) or CM (24.1% stage I, 8.9% stage IV) (P = 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.7 years for all patients, and 1.0 year for metastatic disease. Considering stage I–III disease, multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated age ≥60 years and higher stage to be independent adverse prognostic factors for RFS and OS. Sentinel lymph node biopsy, undertaken for 56 stage I–III patients (25 AM, 31 CM) did not influence outcome. Conclusion: Our study reinforces the known unique clinicopathologic features of melanomas in Asians where AM and MM predominate. Age and stage remain the most critical prognostic factors across all subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim A nomogram for prediction of 12-year sarcoma-specific survival has been developed based on patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated in Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC). We aim to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the MSKCC sarcoma nomogram in a cohort of patients treated at an Asian institution. This has not been validated in an Asian population and thus its universal applicability remains unproven. Materials and methods Between 1990 and 2013, 840 adult patients underwent treatment for primary soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Patients who presented with locally recurrent or metastatic disease were excluded from the analysis. The variables included in the MSKCC nomogram included age at diagnosis, tumor size, histologic grade, histologic subtype, depth and site. A total of 399 patients were left for analysis. The nomogram was validated by assessing its extent of discrimination and level of calibration. Results All patients had deep tumors. Disease occurred most commonly in the lower extremity ( n = 149 [37.3%]), the most common histologic subtype was 'Others' (angiosarcoma, ewing's sarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, sarcoma NOS [not otherwise specified] and rhabdomyosarcoma). Sixty-four percent of all patients had high-grade tumors while 36% had low-grade tumors. The median patient age at diagnosis was 54 years (range: 17-88 years). The median follow up time for all patients and surviving patients were 29 (range: 1-174) and 33 (range: 1-157) months, respectively. The observed 5- and 10-year sarcoma-specific survival were 55% and 33%, respectively. The concordance index was 0.71. For level of calibration, the observed correspondence between predicted and actual outcomes suggest that the MSKCC nomogram generally predicts well for patients with higher survival probability, but consistently overpredicts survival for the other groups, in our cohort of patients. Conclusion The MSKCC sarcoma nomogram was found to be accurate in terms of extent of discrimination. In terms of level of calibration, it generally predicts well for patients with higher survival probability, but consistently overpredicts survival for the other groups in our population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim To review our experience in the management of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) in a single institution, with a predominantly Asian population, and identify associated prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence. Materials and methods All RPSs diagnosed and managed at our center between January 2000 and March 2014 were included. Exclusion criteria included patients whose medical records were untraceable and patients who underwent biopsy but did not undergo resection. The variables studied were age, gender, histological subtype, tumor size, tumor grade, surgical margins, type of presentation of tumor (primary or recurrent) and presence of contiguous organ resection. The primary outcome measured was OS. Results Eighty-five patients underwent resection of RPS with curative intent. Eight patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and 15 patients underwent radiotherapy. The median DFS was 21 months (range: 0-146) and median OS was 45 months (range: 1-233). On univariate analysis, resection margin ( P = 0.04), tumor grade ( P = 0.011) and type of presentation of tumor ( P = 0.007) were found to significantly affect OS. Patients with tumor adherent to contiguous organs had a greater OS as compared to patients with tumor invasive into the contiguous organs ( P = 0.02). Conclusion An aggressive surgical approach in primary and recurrent RPS is associated with good OS. Complete resection, with contiguous organ resection if necessary should be performed to achieve microscopically negative surgical margins to allow for long-term survival. However, tumor biology remains the main determinant for OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Benefit of adjuvant imatinib therapy following curative resection in patients with intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is unclear. GIST-specific exon mutations, in particular exon 11 deletions, have been shown to be prognostic. We hypothesize that specific KIT mutations may improve risk stratification in patients with intermediate-risk GIST, identifying a subgroup of patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Methods In total, 142 GIST patients with complete clinicopathologic and mutational data from two sites were included. Risk classification was based on the modified National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria. Results In this cohort, 74% ( n = 105) of patients harbored a KIT mutation; 61% ( n = 86) were found in exon 11 of which nearly 70% were KIT exon 11 deletions ( n = 60). A total of 18% ( n = 25) of cases were classified as having intermediate-risk disease. Univariate analysis confirmed tumor size, mitotic index, nongastric origin, presence of tumor rupture and modified NIH criteria were adversely prognostic for relapse-free survival (RFS). Among KIT/PDGFRA mutants, KIT exon 11 deletions had a significantly worse prognosis (hazard ratio 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-4.10; P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed KIT exon 11 deletion ( P = 0.003) and clinical risk classification ( P < 0.001) as independent adverse prognostic factors for RFS. Intermediate-risk patients harboring KIT exon 11 deletions had RFS outcomes similar to high-risk patients. Conclusion The presence of KIT exon 11 deletion mutation in patients with intermediate-risk GIST is associated with an inferior clinical outcome with RFS similar to high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Brain metastasis is rare in sarcoma. Prognostic factors, optimal management strategies and therapeutic outcomes of such patients are not well studied. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of parenchymal brain metastasis in sarcoma patients. Methods: This is a single center retrospective analysis. Overall survival ( OS) was calculated from the time of diagnosis of brain metastasis to time of death. Results: Sixteen patients (2.1%) with complete electronic medical records treated at our institution from 2002 to 2010 were identified. Median age was 52 years; 88% had additional sites of metastases. Eight different subtypes of soft tissue and bone sarcoma were identified. Eighty-one percent of the patients developed metachronous brain metastasis at a median of 14 months after initial sarcoma diagnosis. Thirty-eight percent of patients had solitary brain metastasis and 44% underwent aggressive therapy for brain metastasis, defined as either surgical resection or multimodality treatment. The remaining 56% received conservative treatment (either whole brain radiation alone, chemotherapy alone or best supportive care). Median OS for the entire cohort was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.1-6.3 months). A trend toward improved OS was observed with an aggressive treatment approach, 3.7 months versus 1.2 months ( P = 0.077) and the usage of chemotherapy ( P = 0.071). Conclusion: Brain metastasis in sarcoma is rare, usually coexists with significant systemic disease and is associated with a grave prognosis. Use of chemotherapy and an aggressive treatment approach in well-selected patients may be associated with improved survival. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]