Search

Renal angiomyolipoma (AML) is the most common benign tumor of the kidney. It consists of blood vessels, smooth muscle and fat components in varying proportions. AML is divided into the sporadic type and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated type. TSC-associated AML develops at a younger age and tends to exhibit a much faster growth rate over time than sporadic AML. AMLs are classified as classic AML, fat-poor AML and epithelioid AML. Epithelioid AML, though rare, shows aggressive behavior leading to distant metastasis and mortality. TSC-associated AML is more likely to have an epithelioid component than sporadic AML. Active surveillance is the suggested management for small AML. Clinical intervention is mainly indicated when there is a substantial risk of rupture. Minimally invasive therapies, including partial nephrectomy, transcatheter arterial embolization, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor treatment are employed for patients who require treatment. An updated algorithm for the management of AML is herein described. According to this algorithm, treatment intervention is recommended for TSC-associated AML >3 cm, even in asymptomatic cases. In cases with asymptomatic sporadic AML >4 cm in size or with an intra-tumoral aneurysm of >5 mm, treatment, including transcatheter arterial embolization or partial nephrectomy, is advised. The major complication of AML is intra-tumoral or retroperitoneal hemorrhage due to rupture that may be serious and life threatening. Thus, correct diagnosis, proper observation, and appropriate treatment are very important in the management of renal AML.

Background/objective: Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in ampullary cancer has never been studied. This study aimed to clarify the feasibility and justification of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in ampullary cancer in terms of surgical risks, and oncologic and survival outcomes. Methods: A propensity score-matching comparison of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy based on seven factors commonly used to predict the survival outcomes in ampullary cancer patients. Results: A total of 147 patients were enrolled, of which 101 and 46 underwent robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomies, respectively. After propensity score-matching with a 2:1 ratio, 88 and 44 patients in the robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy groups were included. The operation time was of no significant difference after matching. The median intraoperative blood loss was much less in those who underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, both before (median, 120 vs. 320 c.c. P

Summary: Background/objective: This study is to assess immunological and graft survival outcomes after pancreas transplant at a single institute in Asia. Methods: Patients undergoing pancreas transplant with enteric drainage were included. Clinical data and outcomes were evaluated and compared between each subgroup. Results: There were 165 cases of pancreas transplant, including 38 (23 %) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK), 24 (15 %) pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 75 (46 %) pancreas transplant alone (PTA), and 28 (17 %) pancreas before kidney transplant (PBK). The overall surgical complication rate was 46.1 %, with highest (62.5 %) in PAK and lowest (32.0 %) in PTA, P = 0.008. The late complications included 32.7 % infection and 3.6 % malignancy. Overall rejection of pancreas graft was 24.8 % including 18.2 % acute and 9.7 % chronic rejection. Rejection was highest in PTA group (36.0 %) and lowest in PBK (3.6 %). There were 56 cases (33.9 %) with graft loss in total, with highest graft loss rate in PTA (38.7 %). The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year pancreas graft survivals for total patients were 98.0 %, 87.7 % and 70.9 % respectively. Conclusions: Enteric drainage in pancreas transplant could be applied safely not only in SPK but also in other subgroups. Enteric drainage itself would not compromise the immunological and graft survival outcomes.

Summary: Background/Objective: There are no reports available on patient satisfaction and quality-of-life after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). This study aimed to evaluate not only surgical outcomes but also patient satisfaction after RPD. Methods: Prospectively collected data for RPD were analyzed for surgical outcomes. Questionnaires were sent to patients to assess patient satisfaction regarding RPD. Results: The study included 105 patients who underwent RPD, with 44 (41.9%) patients presenting with associated surgical complications. There were no significant differences between the without and with complication groups in median console time (390 min. Vs. 373 min.), blood loss (100 mL vs. 100 mL), and harvested lymph node number (14 vs. 15). There was no surgical mortality in this study. Major complications ≥ Clavien–Dindo III occurred in 7.6% of the total 105 RPD patients. The most common complication was chyle leakage (18.1%), followed by postoperative pancreatic fistula (5.7%), intra-abdominal abscess (4.8%), delayed gastric emptying (3.8%), and post pancreatectomy hemorrhage (3.8%). Almost all of the patients responded to this RPD-related survey with “fair” to “excellent” grades for all items, except 1 (