1. Supergiant fast X-ray transients versus classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries: Does the difference lie in the companion wind?
- Author
-
Enrico Bozzo, Biswajit Paul, and Pragati Pradhan
- Subjects
Physics ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Accretion (meteorology) ,X-ray ,Astronomy and Astrophysics ,Astrophysics ,Photoionization ,01 natural sciences ,Luminosity ,Space and Planetary Science ,0103 physical sciences ,High mass ,Supergiant ,010303 astronomy & astrophysics ,Equivalent width ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Line (formation) - Abstract
We present a comparative study of stellar winds in classical supergiant high mass X-ray binaries (SgXBs) and supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXTs) based on the analysis of publicly available out-of-eclipse observations performed with Suzaku and XMM-Newton. Our data set includes 55 observations of classical SgXBs and 21 observations of SFXTs. We found that classical SgXBs are characterized by a systematically higher absorption and luminosity compared to the SFXTs, confirming the results of previous works in the literature. Additionally, we show that the equivalent width of the fluorescence Kα iron line in the classical SgXBs is significantly larger than that of the SFXTs (outside X-ray eclipses). Based on our current understanding of the physics of accretion in these systems, we conclude that the most likely explanation of these differences is ascribed to the presence of mechanisms inhibiting accretion most of the time in SFXTs, thereby leading to a much less efficient photoionization of the stellar wind compared to classical SgXBs. We do not find evidence for the previously reported anticorrelation between the equivalent width of the fluorescence iron line and the luminosity of SgXBs.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF